General Orthopedics 2026 Practice Questions: Set 7 (Solved)
27 Apr 2026
131 min read
99 Views

Key Takeaway
Discover the latest medical recommendations for General Orthopedics 2026 Practice Questions: Set 7 (Solved). Access high-yield General Orthopedics questions for the 2026 board exam. This module (Set 7) covers critical topics including surgical techniques, pathology, and treatment protocols with verified answers.
HY 2026
00:00
Start Quiz
Question 601 High Yield
When evaluating a patient with hallux rigidus, what is the most important clinical factor indicating the need for an arthrodesis as opposed to a cheilectomy?

Detailed Explanation
Cheilectomy has been shown to provide satisfactory pain relief and improved function in long-term studies. It is important to select patients appropriately when choosing a cheilectomy versus an arthrodesis. Pain at the midrange of motion and loss of more than 50% of the metatarsal head cartilage are predictors of a poor outcome following cheilectomy, and these patients should receive an arthrodesis. Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS: Hallux rigidus: Grading and long-term results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2072-2088.
References:
- Easley ME, Davis WH, Anderson RB: Intermediate to long-term follow-up of medial-approach dorsal cheilectomy for hallux rigidus. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:147-152.
<span>Question 602</span> <span>High Yield</span>
A 55-year-old man underwent cementless total hip arthroplasty for advanced painful osteoarthritis of the hip 2 years ago. The follow-up radiograph shown in Figure 30 shows
<img alt="General Orthopedics 2026 Practice Questions: Set 7 (Solved) - Figure 1" class="q-img mcq-img" height="393" loading="lazy" onclick="window.open(this.src)" src="/media/mcq-images/25/general-orthopedics-2026-set-7-mcqs-4062-fig-1.webp" title="Click to enlarge" width="275"/>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="602" onclick="handleSelect(this, '602', 0)">
<span class="opt-char">A</span>
<span>spot welds and calcar atrophy.</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="602" onclick="handleSelect(this, '602', 1)">
<span class="opt-char">B</span>
<span>subsidence.</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="602" onclick="handleSelect(this, '602', 2)">
<span class="opt-char">C</span>
<span>distal cortical hypertrophy.</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="602" onclick="handleSelect(this, '602', 3)">
<span class="opt-char">D</span>
<span>distal pedestal formation.</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="602" onclick="handleSelect(this, '602', 4)">
<span class="opt-char">E</span>
<span>complete lucent line around the stem.</span>
</button>
<button onclick="toggleExp('602')" style="background:none; border:none; color:#7f8c8d; text-decoration:underline; cursor:pointer;">Show Explanation</button>
<span class="exp-title">Detailed Explanation</span><div markdown="1">The radiograph shows a well-osseointegrated tapered stem with a metaphyseal porous coating, spot welds in the porous region, and calcar rounding. Trochanteric stress shielding and distal cortical hypertrophy are also signs of ingrown stems but are seen more frequently in association with extensively porous-coated stems exhibiting diaphyseal ingrowth. There is no evidence of lucent lines or a pedestal, signs that suggest instability. Femoral stem subsidence can be determined only by a review of sequential radiographs. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE: Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop 1990;257:107-128.
<strong>References:</strong><ul><li>Vresilovic E, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH: Radiographic assessment of cementless femoral components: Correlation with intraoperative mechanical stability. J Arthroplasty 1994;9:137-141.</li></ul>
<span>Question 603</span> <span>High Yield</span>
A previously asymptomatic 40-year-old man injures his shoulder in a fall. Examination shows that he is unable to lift the hand away from his back while maximally internally rotated. An axial MRI scan of the shoulder is shown in Figure 14. What is the most likely diagnosis?
<img alt="General Orthopedics 2026 Practice Questions: Set 7 (Solved) - Figure 2" class="q-img mcq-img" height="393" loading="lazy" onclick="window.open(this.src)" src="/media/mcq-images/25/general-orthopedics-2026-set-7-mcqs-4062-fig-2.webp" title="Click to enlarge" width="393"/>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="603" onclick="handleSelect(this, '603', 0)">
<span class="opt-char">A</span>
<span>Pectoralis major tendon rupture</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="603" onclick="handleSelect(this, '603', 1)">
<span class="opt-char">B</span>
<span>Supraspinatus rupture</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="603" onclick="handleSelect(this, '603', 2)">
<span class="opt-char">C</span>
<span>Subscapularis rupture</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="603" onclick="handleSelect(this, '603', 3)">
<span class="opt-char">D</span>
<span>Bankart tear</span>
</button>
<button class="opt-btn" data-qid="603" onclick="handleSelect(this, '603', 4)">
<span class="opt-char">E</span>
<span>Humeral avulsion of the inferior glenohumeral ligament</span>
</button>
<button onclick="toggleExp('603')" style="background:none; border:none; color:#7f8c8d; text-decoration:underline; cursor:pointer;">Show Explanation</button>
<span class="exp-title">Detailed Explanation</span><div markdown="1">The MRI scan shows detachment of the subscapularis from its insertion on the lesser tuberosity. The examination finding is consistent with a positive lift-off test, also indicating a tear of the subscapularis. Lyons RP, Green A: Subscapularis tendon tears. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:353-363.
<strong>References:</strong><ul><li>Warner JJ, Higgins L, Parsons IM, et al: Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:37-46.</li></ul>