Foot And Ankle Self Assessme Review | Dr Hutaif Foot & - ...

Comprehensive Introduction and Patho-Epidemiology

The tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint complex, eponymously named after the Napoleonic-era surgeon Jacques Lisfranc de St. Martin, represents the critical biomechanical transition point between the midfoot and the forefoot. Injuries to this complex encompass a broad spectrum of pathology, ranging from subtle, purely ligamentous sprains to devastating, high-energy crush injuries with frank fracture-dislocations. Despite advancements in modern orthopedic imaging, Lisfranc injuries remain notoriously underdiagnosed in the acute setting, with historical literature suggesting that up to twenty percent of these injuries are missed at initial presentation. This diagnostic failure frequently results in a predictable and debilitating cascade of chronic midfoot instability, progressive arch collapse, and advanced post-traumatic osteoarthritis. The classic delayed presentation is perfectly encapsulated by a middle-aged patient—such as the 45-year-old male referenced in self-assessment literature—who presents months or years after a seemingly innocuous sprain with persistent midfoot pain, subtle forefoot abduction, and compensatory hindfoot pronation.

The pathophysiology of chronic Lisfranc instability is rooted in the disruption of the delicate equilibrium that maintains the longitudinal and transverse arches of the foot. In the acute phase, high-energy axial loading on a plantarflexed foot, or low-energy twisting mechanisms, can rupture the primary stabilizing ligaments. When these injuries are treated non-operatively—either due to a missed diagnosis or an underestimation of the inherent instability—the normal load-bearing capacity of the medial column is compromised. Over time, the repetitive physiological loads of normal ambulation exceed the capacity of the attenuated secondary stabilizers. This leads to a progressive dorsal and lateral subluxation of the lesser metatarsals, effectively uncoupling the structural integrity of the midfoot.

Epidemiologically, these injuries exhibit a bimodal distribution. High-energy trauma, such as motor vehicle collisions and industrial crush injuries, typically affects younger patients and presents with obvious, severe soft tissue compromise and gross radiographic deformity. Conversely, low-energy athletic injuries, frequently seen in football, rugby, and equestrian sports, often result in subtle, purely ligamentous disruptions. It is this latter cohort that most frequently progresses to chronic instability. The resultant altered kinematics cause abnormal shear forces across the articular cartilage of the TMT joints. Cartilage degradation accelerates, leading to subchondral sclerosis, osteophyte formation, and the clinical manifestation of a rigid, painful, and deformed midfoot that is highly recalcitrant to conservative management.

Once the cascade of post-traumatic osteoarthritis is initiated, non-operative modalities—such as custom orthotics with rigid arch supports, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and activity modification—rarely provide durable relief. The structural collapse of the medial and middle columns alters the entire gait cycle, diminishing the propulsive power of the toe-off phase and causing proximal kinetic chain symptoms in the knee, hip, and lumbar spine. At this chronic juncture, the surgical algorithm shifts definitively away from anatomic reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) toward primary TMT arthrodesis, which serves to eliminate the painful, arthritic articulations while restoring the anatomic alignment of the foot.

Detailed Surgical Anatomy and Biomechanics

The osseous architecture of the Lisfranc complex is inherently stable, relying on a sophisticated "Roman arch" configuration. The transverse arch of the midfoot is formed by the wedge-shaped cuneiforms and the bases of the metatarsals, with the dorsal aspects being wider than the plantar aspects. The cornerstone of this structural stability is the base of the second metatarsal, which is recessed proximally into a mortise formed by the medial, intermediate, and lateral cuneiforms. This "keystone" configuration effectively locks the midfoot, preventing medial-lateral translation and providing immense resistance to dorsal subluxation during axial loading. The first, second, and third TMT joints form the rigid medial and middle columns of the foot, while the fourth and fifth TMT joints form the highly mobile lateral column, which is essential for accommodating uneven terrain.

Ligamentous support of the TMT joints is robust, divided into dorsal, interosseous, and plantar groups. The dorsal ligaments are relatively thin and weak, making dorsal dislocation the most common vector of failure when the foot is subjected to extreme plantarflexion. The plantar ligaments are significantly thicker and stronger, serving as the primary tension band of the longitudinal arch. However, the most critical stabilizing structure is the Lisfranc ligament proper. This stout interosseous ligament originates from the lateral aspect of the medial cuneiform and inserts obliquely onto the medial base of the second metatarsal. Crucially, there is no direct ligamentous connection between the bases of the first and second metatarsals. Therefore, the Lisfranc ligament is the sole structural tether preventing lateral displacement of the lesser metatarsals relative to the medial column.

The neurovascular anatomy surrounding the Lisfranc complex is of paramount importance during surgical approaches. The dorsalis pedis artery, a continuation of the anterior tibial artery, courses distally over the dorsum of the midfoot. At the proximal aspect of the first intermetatarsal space, it gives off the arcuate artery and then dives deeply between the bases of the first and second metatarsals to join the deep plantar arch. The deep peroneal nerve accompanies the dorsalis pedis artery and provides sensation to the first dorsal web space. Surgical dissection in this interval must be meticulous to avoid catastrophic vascular injury or the formation of painful neuromas. Additionally, the superficial peroneal nerve branches must be identified and protected during dorsal skin incisions.

Biomechanically, the Lisfranc complex is integral to the load-transfer mechanism of the foot during the stance phase of gait. As the body's center of mass moves forward, the heel rises, and the metatarsophalangeal joints dorsiflex, engaging the plantar fascia via the windlass mechanism. This action supinates the hindfoot and rigidly locks the midfoot, transforming the foot from a flexible shock absorber into a rigid lever arm for propulsion. Disruption of the Lisfranc ligament uncouples this mechanism. The medial column loses its structural rigidity, the arch collapses, and the propulsive force is dissipated. In chronic cases, this biomechanical failure manifests as the classic forefoot abduction and hindfoot pronation, leading to a severe loss of functional capacity and progressive joint destruction.

Exhaustive Indications and Contraindications

The paradigm for managing Lisfranc injuries has evolved significantly over the past two decades, particularly regarding the indications for primary arthrodesis versus open reduction and internal fixation. Historically, ORIF was the gold standard for all acute injuries. However, contemporary orthopedic consensus, heavily influenced by landmark prospective trials, now strongly advocates for primary TMT arthrodesis in specific clinical scenarios. The foremost indication for primary arthrodesis is chronic, symptomatic Lisfranc instability with established post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Patients presenting months or years post-injury with midfoot pain, loss of arch height, and radiographic evidence of joint space narrowing are not candidates for joint-preserving procedures. The cartilage degradation is irreversible, and attempting ORIF in this setting will inevitably fail, necessitating a secondary fusion.

In the acute setting, primary arthrodesis is definitively indicated for purely ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. Ligamentous healing in the midfoot is notoriously unpredictable, and the functional demands placed on the TMT joints frequently lead to late collapse if ORIF is utilized. Primary fusion of the first, second, and third TMT joints provides a rigid, durable medial column, significantly reducing the reoperation rate compared to hardware removal and subsequent salvage fusions required after failed ORIF. Additionally, severe comminution of the articular surfaces—often seen in high-energy crush injuries—where anatomic restoration of the cartilage is impossible, serves as a strong indication for primary arthrodesis.

Contraindications to TMT arthrodesis must be carefully evaluated to prevent catastrophic surgical failures. Absolute contraindications include active local or systemic infection, severe peripheral arterial disease precluding wound healing, and profound medical comorbidities that make the patient an unacceptable anesthetic risk. The presence of an active Charcot arthropathy in the acute, fragmented phase (Eichenholtz Stage I) is generally considered a contraindication to traditional arthrodesis due to the unacceptably high risk of hardware failure and nonunion. In such diabetic neuropathic patients, prolonged immobilization until the coalescent phase is reached is mandatory before considering reconstructive fusion.

Relative contraindications include severe osteoporosis, which compromises hardware purchase, and active tobacco use. Smoking profoundly impairs osteogenesis and microvascular perfusion, dramatically increasing the risk of nonunion and wound dehiscence. Many orthopedic surgeons require a minimum of four to six weeks of documented smoking cessation, often verified by serum cotinine levels, prior to undertaking elective midfoot arthrodesis. Patient non-compliance is another critical relative contraindication; the success of a TMT arthrodesis relies heavily on strict adherence to a prolonged non-weight-bearing postoperative protocol.

Pre-Operative Planning, Templating, and Patient Positioning

Thorough preoperative planning is the cornerstone of a successful midfoot arthrodesis. The diagnostic workup must begin with high-quality, weight-bearing radiographs of the foot, including anteroposterior, lateral, and 30-degree internal oblique views. Weight-bearing is essential, as non-weight-bearing films frequently mask subtle instability. The surgeon must meticulously evaluate the alignment of the medial border of the second metatarsal with the medial border of the intermediate cuneiform on the AP view, and the medial border of the fourth metatarsal with the medial border of the cuboid on the oblique view. The lateral view is scrutinized for loss of the longitudinal arch, dorsal displacement of the metatarsal bases, and the presence of a "step-off" at the TMT junction.

Advanced cross-sectional imaging is virtually mandatory in the preoperative planning phase for chronic injuries. A fine-cut computed tomography (CT) scan provides invaluable three-dimensional information regarding the extent of osteoarthritic changes, the presence of subchondral cysts, and the degree of bone stock available for hardware purchase. CT imaging frequently reveals degenerative changes in adjacent joints, such as the naviculocuneiform or intercuneiform joints, which may necessitate extending the fusion mass to achieve comprehensive pain relief. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive for detecting acute ligamentous edema, its utility in the chronic, arthritic setting is limited compared to the structural detail provided by a CT scan.

Templating involves selecting the appropriate fixation construct based on the patient's anatomy and the specific joints to be fused. The surgeon must decide between transarticular solid or cannulated screws, dorsal spanning plates, or a hybrid construct. Dorsal bridge plating has gained significant popularity as it preserves the plantar tension band and avoids violating the articular surfaces with large-diameter screws, which can act as stress risers. The surgeon must also plan for bone grafting. In cases of chronic collapse, structural bone graft (autograft from the iliac crest or proximal tibia, or robust allograft) is often required to restore the length of the medial column and correct the forefoot abduction deformity.

Patient positioning is critical for optimal surgical access and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The patient is placed in the supine position on a radiolucent operating table. A bump is placed under the ipsilateral hip to internally rotate the leg, bringing the foot into a neutral, upward-facing position, as the lower extremity naturally rests in external rotation. A thigh tourniquet is applied to provide a bloodless surgical field, though it should be used judiciously to minimize ischemic time. The fluoroscopy unit (C-arm) is positioned on the contralateral side of the table, allowing for unobstructed AP, lateral, and oblique views throughout the procedure. The entire lower extremity is prepped and draped to allow for assessment of overall limb alignment during the deformity correction.

Step-by-Step Surgical Approach and Fixation Technique

The surgical approach to the Lisfranc complex typically utilizes two longitudinal dorsal incisions, which provide comprehensive access to the medial and middle columns while preserving a wide skin bridge to prevent soft tissue necrosis. The first incision is centered over the first intermetatarsal space, extending from the naviculocuneiform joint distally to the mid-shaft of the first and second metatarsals. Dissection is carried down through the subcutaneous tissue, meticulously identifying and retracting the branches of the superficial peroneal nerve. The extensor hallucis longus (EHL) tendon is retracted medially, and the extensor digitorum brevis is retracted laterally. The critical deep neurovascular bundle—the dorsalis pedis artery and deep peroneal nerve—is identified and protected, usually by retracting it laterally.

The second incision is placed over the third and fourth TMT joints, lateral to the extensor digitorum longus tendons. This dual-incision technique allows direct visualization of the first through fourth TMT joints. Once the joints are exposed, the most critical phase of the arthrodesis begins: joint preparation. A combination of osteotomes, curettes, and high-speed burrs is used to completely denude the articular cartilage from the opposing surfaces of the cuneiforms and metatarsal bases. It is imperative to remove all cartilage down to bleeding subchondral bone. To stimulate osteogenesis, the subchondral bone is frequently fenestrated or "fish-scaled" using a small drill bit or osteotome, ensuring a robust vascular bed for the fusion mass.

Deformity correction must precede definitive fixation. In chronic cases, the forefoot is typically abducted and dorsiflexed. The surgeon must restore the anatomic plantarflexion of the first ray and adduct the forefoot to recreate the longitudinal and transverse arches. This is often achieved using a pin distractor placed between the medial cuneiform and the first metatarsal, or by utilizing a Weber clamp to compress the second metatarsal base back into the cuneiform mortise. Provisional fixation is achieved with multiple smooth Kirschner wires (K-wires). Intraoperative fluoroscopy is utilized extensively at this stage to confirm absolute anatomic alignment in all three planes before proceeding to permanent hardware placement.

Definitive fixation requires rigid compression across the prepared joint surfaces. A classic technique involves placing a "home run" screw—a 3.5mm or 4.0mm solid or cannulated screw—directed from the medial aspect of the medial cuneiform into the base of the second metatarsal, effectively recreating the vector of the native Lisfranc ligament. The first, second, and third TMT joints are then individually compressed using transarticular lag screws or stabilized with dorsal, low-profile locking plates. If structural bone graft was required to restore medial column length, dorsal plating is highly advantageous to span the graft and provide a tension band effect. The fourth and fifth TMT joints are mobile and essential for gait accommodation; therefore, they are rarely fused. If they are highly unstable, they may be temporarily pinned with K-wires, which are removed at six weeks postoperatively.

Complications, Incidence Rates, and Salvage Management

Despite meticulous surgical technique, midfoot arthrodesis carries a distinct profile of postoperative complications. The most formidable of these is nonunion, which occurs in approximately 5% to 10% of cases. Nonunion is significantly higher in patients with compromised microvascular perfusion, particularly active smokers and poorly controlled diabetics. Clinically, nonunion presents as persistent midfoot pain, swelling, and a failure of radiographic consolidation by six months postoperatively. Salvage management for a symptomatic nonunion requires a revision arthrodesis. This involves complete removal of the existing hardware, aggressive debridement of the fibrous nonunion site, rigid internal fixation with larger diameter screws or heavier plates, and the mandatory use of autologous bone graft or orthobiologics (such as bone morphogenetic protein, BMP) to stimulate osteogenesis.

Hardware prominence and subsequent soft tissue irritation are exceedingly common, given the paucity of subcutaneous fat over the dorsum of the foot. Dorsal plates and screw heads frequently cause painful bursitis or tendon tendinosis (particularly of the EHL or tibialis anterior). Literature suggests that symptomatic hardware requiring surgical removal occurs in up to 20% to 30% of patients following TMT arthrodesis. Hardware removal is generally delayed until at least nine to twelve months postoperatively to ensure robust osseous consolidation of the fusion mass. Surgeons must counsel patients preoperatively that a secondary, albeit minor, procedure for hardware extraction is a distinct possibility.

Adjacent segment disease is a long-term biomechanical consequence of midfoot fusion. By eliminating the motion at the TMT joints, increased stress is transferred proximally to the naviculocuneiform and intercuneiform joints, and distally to the metatarsophalangeal joints. Over a period of years to decades, this altered load distribution can lead to degenerative arthritis in these adjacent articulations. If conservative management (orthotics, injections) fails, salvage may require extending the fusion mass proximally. Furthermore, iatrogenic flatfoot can occur if the medial column is fused in an insufficiently plantarflexed position, leading to chronic midfoot pain and altered gait kinematics.

Phased Post-Operative Rehabilitation Protocols

The postoperative rehabilitation following a primary TMT arthrodesis is protracted and demands strict patient compliance to ensure successful osseous union. The protocol is generally divided into three distinct phases. Phase I (0 to 6 weeks) is characterized by absolute non-weight-bearing. Immediately following surgery, the foot is placed in a bulky, well-padded posterior splint to accommodate postoperative edema. The patient is instructed to maintain strict elevation of the extremity above the level of the heart to mitigate swelling and reduce the risk of wound dehiscence. At the two-week postoperative visit, the splint and sutures are removed. If the incisions are fully healed, the patient is transitioned into a rigid, short-leg fiberglass cast or a locked controlled ankle motion (CAM) boot, but strict non-weight-bearing status is maintained for a total of six weeks.

Phase II (6 to 10 weeks) marks the transition to progressive weight-bearing, contingent upon clinical and radiographic evidence of early bone healing. At the six-week mark, new weight-bearing radiographs are obtained. If the hardware is intact and there are no signs of displacement or lucency at the fusion sites, the patient may begin protected, partial weight-bearing in a CAM boot. Weight-bearing is typically advanced by 25% of body weight per week, utilizing crutches or a walker for support. During this phase, physical therapy is initiated, focusing on active and passive range of motion of the ankle and metatarsophalangeal joints to prevent disabling stiffness. Edema control remains a priority, often utilizing compression stockings.

Phase III (10 to 16 weeks and beyond) focuses on weaning the patient from the CAM boot and restoring normal gait kinematics. Once full weight-bearing in the boot is tolerated without pain, the patient is transitioned into a stiff-soled, supportive athletic shoe. A custom-molded orthotic or a carbon-fiber rigid insert is frequently prescribed to support the fused medial column and reduce bending moments across the midfoot. Physical therapy intensifies, emphasizing intrinsic foot musculature strengthening, proprioceptive retraining, and aggressive gait mechanics correction.

Return to high-impact activities, such as running or heavy manual labor, is a gradual process that typically requires six to twelve months. Patients must be extensively counseled that the biomechanics of their foot have been permanently altered. While the arthrodesis provides excellent pain relief and stability, the loss of midfoot mobility means that the foot will never function exactly as it did prior to the injury. Expectations regarding a return to elite athletic performance must be carefully managed, as the rigid lever arm created by the fusion alters the explosive capability of the foot.

Summary of Landmark Literature and Clinical Guidelines

The surgical management of Lisfranc injuries has been profoundly shaped by several landmark studies over the past two decades. The most pivotal of these is the prospective, randomized clinical trial conducted by Ly and Coetzee, published in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery in 2006. This study compared open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) against primary TMT arthrodesis for purely ligamentous acute Lisfranc injuries. The authors demonstrated that the primary arthrodesis cohort had significantly better functional outcomes, higher AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) scores, and a drastically lower rate of secondary surgeries compared to the ORIF group, which frequently required hardware removal and subsequent salvage fusions due to late collapse.

Following this, Henning et al. (2009) published a prospective study that further validated the use of primary arthrodesis, noting that while ORIF may be suitable for strictly bony fracture-dislocations where anatomic articular reduction is possible, any significant ligamentous component or articular comminution is better served by immediate fusion. This literature firmly established the modern treatment algorithm: bony injuries may undergo ORIF, but ligamentous and highly comminuted injuries require primary arthrodesis to prevent the inevitable onset of post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

More recently, biomechanical and clinical literature has focused on the optimal fixation constructs for TMT arthrodesis. Meta-analyses by Qiao et al. have compared transarticular screws with dorsal bridge plating. The literature suggests that dorsal plating provides superior biomechanical stability by acting as a tension band against plantar gapping, while simultaneously avoiding the iatrogenic cartilage and subchondral bone damage caused by large-diameter transarticular screws. Consequently, many academic foot and ankle surgeons now favor dorsal plating, particularly for the first and second TMT joints.

Current consensus guidelines from the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) reflect this robust body of evidence. For the chronic presentation—such as the 45-year-old male presenting 18 months post-injury with midfoot collapse and arthritis—the guidelines are unequivocal. Non-operative management is recognized as having a high failure rate in the presence of structural deformity. Primary TMT arthrodesis is universally recommended as the definitive gold standard procedure. It reliably eliminates the source of arthritic pain, restores the anatomic architecture of the medial and middle columns, and provides a durable, functional limb capable of sustaining the demands of daily living and moderate physical activity.