ABOS Part I & AAOS OITE Orthopedic Surgery Review: Knee ACL, Meniscus, & Hand Flexor Tendon Repair | Part 22221

ABOS Part I Comprehensive Review - Batch 79

This module contains 22 advanced orthopedic multiple-choice questions developed to mirror the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part I and AAOS OITE examinations. Questions are derived directly from high-yield clinical teaching cases.

Generated MCQ Transcript

Question 1: A 22-year-old collegiate soccer player presents with acute right knee pain and instability after a non-contact pivoting injury. Clinical examination reveals a Grade III Lachman test, a high-grade pivot shift, and mild gapping with valgus stress at 30 degrees of flexion. Plain radiographs show a subtle avulsion fracture from the lateral aspect of the proximal tibia. Which of the following statements best describes the significance of the radiographic finding and its associated injury?

• A: It is a Segond fracture, pathognomonic for a PCL rupture and indicating posterolateral corner instability.
• B: It is a Segond fracture, pathognomonic for an ACL rupture and indicating anterolateral capsular injury.
• C: It is an arcuate fracture, indicating avulsion of the popliteus tendon and posterolateral corner instability.
• D: It is a tibial spine avulsion fracture, indicating a high-energy ACL rupture with bony involvement.
• E: It is a lateral tibial plateau fracture, suggesting a direct impact injury rather than a rotational mechanism.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case explicitly states that a subtle, small elliptic avulsion fracture arising from the lateral aspect of the proximal tibia, just distal to the articular surface, was identified on plain radiographs. This finding is known as a Segond fracture. It represents an avulsion of the anterolateral capsule and anterolateral ligament (ALL) and is considered pathognomonic for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. Its presence indicates a higher degree of anterolateral rotatory instability, which aligns with the clinical finding of a high-grade pivot shift.Option A is incorrect because a Segond fracture is pathognomonic for an ACL rupture, not a PCL rupture, and indicates anterolateral, not posterolateral, instability.Option C is incorrect because an arcuate fracture involves the fibular head and is associated with avulsion of the fibular collateral ligament or popliteus tendon, indicating posterolateral corner injury, which is distinct from the described lateral tibial plateau avulsion.Option D is incorrect because a tibial spine avulsion fracture involves the intercondylar eminence of the tibia and is a different type of bony ACL injury, not the lateral tibial plateau avulsion described.Option E is incorrect because while it is a fracture of the lateral tibial plateau region, its specific morphology (avulsion) and location are characteristic of a Segond fracture, which is strongly associated with rotational and valgus mechanisms leading to ACL injury, rather than a direct impact.

Question 2: Following the initial clinical assessment, an MRI of the right knee was obtained. Review the provided sagittal T2-weighted image. Which of the following findings is most accurately depicted in this image and is consistent with the patient's presentation?

• A: Complete rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament with posterior tibial sag.
• B: A bucket-handle tear of the lateral meniscus with displacement into the intercondylar notch.
• C: A complete mid-substance rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament with associated bone bruising.
• D: A Grade III sprain of the medial collateral ligament with significant gapping.
• E: An osteochondral fracture of the patella with a large hemarthrosis.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CThe provided sagittal T2-weighted MRI image, combined with the case description, clearly demonstrates a complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The ligament fibers are discontinuous, edematous, and appear amorphous, consistent with the 'empty notch sign' mentioned in the text. Furthermore, the image shows areas of hyperintensity (bone bruising) in the middle portion of the lateral femoral condyle and the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau, which are characteristic osteochondral impaction injuries resulting from the pivot-shift mechanism. This aligns perfectly with the patient's mechanism of injury and clinical findings.Option A is incorrect because the case explicitly states that the posterior drawer test and posterior sag sign were negative, confirming an intact posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). The image does not show PCL rupture.Option B is incorrect because the case states the lateral meniscus appeared intact, and the medial meniscus had a longitudinal vertical tear in the posterior horn, not a bucket-handle tear of the lateral meniscus.Option D is incorrect because the case describes a Grade I to II sprain of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL), not a Grade III sprain with significant gapping. While MCL injury is present, this option overstates its severity and is not the primary finding highlighted by the image in the context of the ACL rupture.Option E is incorrect because the case states no gross fractures of the patella were identified on X-rays, and the MRI primarily shows ACL rupture and bone bruising, not a patellar osteochondral fracture.

Question 3: Given the patient's age, activity level, and the presence of a high-grade pivot shift with a Segond fracture, the surgical team decided to augment the intra-articular ACL reconstruction with a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET). Which of the following best describes the technique for the modified Lemaire LET performed in this case?

• A: A strip of the semitendinosus tendon is harvested, passed deep to the LCL, and fixed to the lateral femoral epicondyle and Gerdy's tubercle.
• B: A 1-cm wide strip of the posterior third of the iliotibial band is harvested, leaving its distal attachment at Gerdy's tubercle intact, passed deep to the fibular collateral ligament, and secured into a femoral socket proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle.
• C: The entire iliotibial band is detached proximally and distally, rerouted, and reattached to the lateral femoral condyle and fibular head.
• D: A synthetic graft is used to reconstruct the anterolateral ligament, fixed to the lateral femoral epicondyle and the anterolateral tibia.
• E: A portion of the biceps femoris tendon is harvested, passed superficial to the LCL, and fixed to the lateral femoral epicondyle.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case explicitly details the technique for the modified Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis: 'A 1-centimeter wide by 8-centimeter long strip of the posterior third of the iliotibial band was harvested, leaving its distal attachment at Gerdy's tubercle intact. The proximal end was whipstitched. The femoral attachment site was identified slightly proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle. A guide pin was placed, and a small socket was drilled. The iliotibial band strip was passed deep to the fibular collateral ligament. With the knee held in 30 degrees of flexion and neutral rotation, the graft was tensioned and secured into the femoral socket using a 6-millimeter bioabsorbable interference screw.'Option A is incorrect as it describes using the semitendinosus and an incorrect fixation pattern for a Lemaire.Option C is incorrect as it describes a more extensive and less common ITB tenodesis, not the modified Lemaire.Option D is incorrect as it describes an ALL reconstruction using a synthetic graft, which is not what was performed in this case.Option E is incorrect as it describes using the biceps femoris tendon and an incorrect passage relative to the LCL.

Question 4: The patient's postoperative rehabilitation protocol includes specific restrictions due to the combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal repair. In Phase I (Weeks 0 to 4), what is the most critical initial weight-bearing and range of motion restriction, and what is its primary rationale?

• A: Full weight-bearing as tolerated with the brace locked in extension to promote quadriceps activation.
• B: Non-weight-bearing with crutches and unrestricted range of motion to prevent arthrofibrosis.
• C: Touch-down weight-bearing with crutches, brace locked in full extension, and range of motion restricted to 0-90 degrees to protect the healing meniscal repair.
• D: Partial weight-bearing with crutches, brace unlocked for ambulation, and full range of motion to restore gait mechanics.
• E: Non-weight-bearing with crutches, brace locked at 30 degrees of flexion, and range of motion restricted to 30-90 degrees to protect the ACL graft.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CThe case explicitly states the Phase I rehabilitation goals: 'The primary goals in the immediate postoperative phase are to control inflammation, protect the graft and meniscal repair, and restore terminal extension.' It further specifies: 'Due to the all-inside repair of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, weight-bearing was restricted. The patient was allowed touch-down weight-bearing with crutches with the brace locked in full extension. Passive and active-assisted range of motion was initiated early but restricted to 0 to 90 degrees for the first four weeks to prevent excessive shear stress on the healing meniscus.' The primary rationale for these restrictions is to protect the delicate meniscal repair during its initial healing phase, as excessive load or motion can disrupt the repair.Option A is incorrect because full weight-bearing is contraindicated with a meniscal repair in the early phase.Option B is incorrect because unrestricted range of motion would jeopardize the meniscal repair.Option D is incorrect because full weight-bearing and an unlocked brace are too aggressive for the initial phase of a meniscal repair.Option E is incorrect because locking the brace at 30 degrees of flexion would promote a flexion contracture and is not standard for ACL/meniscal repair. The ROM restriction is also not optimal.

Question 5: The patient's primary goal is to return to elite-level competitive soccer. Considering his age, activity level, and the presence of a repairable medial meniscal tear, what was the most appropriate graft choice for his ACL reconstruction, and what is its key advantage in this scenario?

• A: Hamstring autograft, due to less anterior knee pain and faster return to sport.
• B: Allograft, due to reduced surgical morbidity and quicker recovery time.
• C: Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BTB) autograft, due to rigid bone-to-bone healing and faster graft incorporation.
• D: Quadriceps tendon autograft, due to its large diameter and low donor site morbidity.
• E: Synthetic graft, due to immediate strength and elimination of donor site issues.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CThe case clearly states: 'The decision was made to proceed with a Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BTB) autograft. The BTB autograft is often considered the gold standard for high-demand cutting athletes. Its primary biomechanical advantage lies in the rigid bone-to-bone healing within the femoral and tibial tunnels, which allows for faster incorporation (typically 6 to 8 weeks) compared to soft tissue healing (10 to 12 weeks). Furthermore, the structural properties of the central third of the patellar tendon closely match those of the native anterior cruciate ligament.'Option A is incorrect because while hamstring autografts have less anterior knee pain, the case notes they 'have been associated with a slightly higher rate of graft elongation and residual laxity in elite athletes,' making BTB preferred for this high-demand patient.Option B is incorrect because the case explicitly states: 'For a young, elite collegiate soccer player, allograft tissue is generally contraindicated due to significantly higher failure rates (up to three to four times higher) compared to autografts in the under-25 demographic.'Option D is incorrect because while quadriceps tendon is a good alternative, BTB was specifically chosen in this case due to the surgeon's experience and robust outcomes in elite soccer players.Option E is incorrect because synthetic grafts are generally not recommended for primary ACL reconstruction due to high failure rates and concerns about synovitis and long-term outcomes.

Question 6: During the arthroscopic portion of the surgery, the medial meniscus was addressed. Review the provided arthroscopic image. Based on the image and the case description, what type of meniscal tear was identified, and what repair technique was utilized?

• A: A radial tear of the lateral meniscus, treated with partial meniscectomy.
• B: A horizontal cleavage tear of the medial meniscus, treated with an outside-in repair.
• C: A complex tear of the medial meniscus, treated with a meniscal root repair.
• D: A longitudinal vertical tear in the posterior horn of the medial meniscus, treated with an all-inside repair.
• E: A bucket-handle tear of the medial meniscus, treated with an inside-out repair.

Explanation: Correct Answer: DThe case description states: 'Attention was turned to the medial meniscus. Probing confirmed a 1.5-centimeter longitudinal vertical tear in the posterior horn, situated in the vascularized red-white zone. The tear was unstable, easily displacing anteriorly into the joint space. An all-inside meniscal repair technique was selected. The meniscal edges and the adjacent synovium were aggressively rasped using an arthroscopic rasp and shaver to stimulate a bleeding bed and promote a healing response. Two all-inside meniscal repair devices (suture anchors) were deployed sequentially, capturing the superior and inferior leaflets of the meniscus and reducing the tear anatomically.'Option A is incorrect because the tear was in the medial meniscus, not lateral, and was repaired, not partially meniscectomized.Option B is incorrect because it was a longitudinal vertical tear, not a horizontal cleavage tear, and an all-inside technique was used.Option C is incorrect because it was a longitudinal vertical tear, not described as complex, and not a root tear.Option E is incorrect because it was a longitudinal vertical tear, not a bucket-handle tear, and an all-inside technique was used.

Question 7: The timing of ACL reconstruction is crucial to optimize outcomes and minimize complications. In this case, surgery was scheduled for four weeks post-injury. What was the primary rationale for delaying the surgical intervention, and how was the concomitant Grade II MCL sprain managed during this period?

• A: To allow for spontaneous healing of the ACL and MCL, potentially avoiding surgery.
• B: To reduce the risk of postoperative arthrofibrosis by allowing resolution of acute inflammation and restoration of knee range of motion, while managing the MCL non-operatively with bracing.
• C: To perform a staged repair of the MCL first, followed by ACL reconstruction.
• D: To allow for complete resolution of the hemarthrosis and initiation of full weight-bearing before surgery.
• E: To obtain additional imaging studies to rule out other injuries, while the MCL was surgically repaired.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case explicitly addresses the timing of surgery: 'Historically, acute reconstruction within the first few days of injury was associated with a high incidence of postoperative joint stiffness. Current evidence-based protocols advocate for a period of "pre-habilitation." The patient was placed in a hinged knee brace and initiated on a strict physical therapy regimen aimed at resolving the acute effusion, restoring normal gait mechanics, and achieving full, symmetric range of motion, particularly terminal extension. Surgery was scheduled for four weeks post-injury, at which point his knee was quiet, the effusion had resolved, and he had regained full extension and 125 degrees of flexion. The concomitant Grade II medial collateral ligament sprain was managed non-operatively during this waiting period. Grade I and II medial collateral ligament injuries have excellent healing potential with bracing and rarely require surgical intervention, even in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.'Option A is incorrect because spontaneous healing of a complete ACL rupture is rare, and the goal was pre-habilitation, not avoiding surgery.Option C is incorrect because Grade I/II MCL sprains are typically managed non-operatively, not with staged surgical repair.Option D is incorrect because while effusion resolution is a goal, full weight-bearing is not necessarily achieved or required before surgery, especially with a meniscal tear.Option E is incorrect because additional imaging was not the primary reason for delay, and the MCL was managed non-operatively.

Question 8: During the surgical procedure, anatomic femoral tunnel placement is critical for successful ACL reconstruction. Which of the following describes the approach and key anatomical landmark used for femoral tunnel creation in this case?

• A: Transtibial drilling, aiming for the anterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle.
• B: Accessory anteromedial portal, with the knee in hyperflexion, targeting the lateral bifurcate ridge and lateral intercondylar ridge on the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle.
• C: Outside-in drilling, targeting the posterior aspect of the medial femoral condyle.
• D: Anterolateral portal, with the knee in full extension, aiming for the anterior aspect of the intercondylar notch.
• E: Posteromedial portal, targeting the PCL footprint on the medial femoral condyle.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case details the femoral tunnel preparation: 'To achieve independent and anatomic femoral tunnel placement, an accessory anteromedial portal was utilized. The knee was hyperflexed to 120 degrees. A guide pin was placed in the center of the native footprint on the medial wall of the lateral femoral condyle, specifically mentioning the lateral bifurcate ridge and the lateral intercondylar ridge (resident's ridge) as landmarks. A 10-millimeter reamer was used to drill the femoral socket to a depth of 25 millimeters.'Option A is incorrect because transtibial drilling often leads to a more vertical femoral tunnel, which is non-anatomic and can compromise rotational stability. The case specifies an accessory anteromedial portal.Option C is incorrect because the femoral tunnel is placed on the lateral femoral condyle for ACL reconstruction, not the medial.Option D is incorrect because the anterolateral portal is typically used for visualization, and the knee is hyperflexed for anatomic femoral tunnel drilling, not full extension.Option E is incorrect because the posteromedial portal is used for posterior compartment pathology or PCL reconstruction, not ACL femoral tunnel placement.

Question 9: A 22-year-old collegiate soccer player presents with acute right knee pain, swelling, and instability following a non-contact pivoting injury. Clinical examination reveals a Grade III Lachman test, a high-grade pivot shift, and mild gapping with valgus stress at 30 degrees of flexion. MRI confirms a complete ACL rupture, a Grade II MCL sprain, and a repairable medial meniscal tear. Which of the following statements regarding the management of the concomitant Grade II MCL sprain is most accurate in this clinical scenario?

• A: It requires immediate surgical repair prior to ACL reconstruction to prevent chronic instability.
• B: It is typically managed non-operatively with bracing and physical therapy, even in the setting of ACL reconstruction, due to its excellent healing potential.
• C: It necessitates a separate surgical procedure for reconstruction using an allograft due to the high demands of the patient's sport.
• D: It is a contraindication to early ACL reconstruction and requires a prolonged period of non-weight-bearing.
• E: It indicates a need for a hinged knee brace locked in 30 degrees of flexion for 6 weeks to promote healing.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case explicitly states: 'The concomitant Grade II medial collateral ligament sprain was managed non-operatively during this waiting period. Grade I and II medial collateral ligament injuries have excellent healing potential with bracing and rarely require surgical intervention, even in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.' This is a well-established principle in orthopedic sports medicine.Option A is incorrect because Grade I and II MCL sprains rarely require surgical repair.Option C is incorrect because surgical reconstruction with allograft is not indicated for a Grade II MCL sprain.Option D is incorrect because a Grade II MCL sprain is not a contraindication to ACL reconstruction, though timing may be influenced by associated injuries. The patient was allowed touch-down weight-bearing, not prolonged non-weight-bearing.Option E is incorrect because while a hinged brace is used, locking it at 30 degrees of flexion is not standard for MCL healing and would promote a flexion contracture. The brace was locked in full extension for ambulation in this case.

Question 10: The patient's clinical presentation, including a high-grade pivot shift and a Segond fracture, strongly suggested profound anterolateral rotatory instability. This finding significantly influenced the surgical decision-making process. What is the primary rationale for adding a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) to the primary ACL reconstruction in this specific patient?

• A: To provide additional static stability against posterior tibial translation.
• B: To prevent recurrent patellar dislocation in a high-risk athlete.
• C: To significantly reduce the risk of graft rupture and persistent rotatory laxity in young, high-risk patients.
• D: To augment the healing of the medial collateral ligament and prevent valgus instability.
• E: To address a concomitant lateral meniscal tear and improve meniscal healing.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CThe case clearly states the rationale for adding a LET: 'Given the presence of a high-grade pivot shift and a radiographic Segond fracture indicating anterolateral complex injury, the addition of a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LET) or Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) reconstruction was strongly considered. Recent biomechanical and clinical outcome studies, including the STABILITY trial, have demonstrated that adding a LET to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young, high-risk patients significantly reduces the risk of graft rupture and persistent rotatory laxity.'Option A is incorrect because LET primarily addresses anterolateral rotatory instability, not posterior tibial translation (which is related to PCL function).Option B is incorrect because LET is for rotatory knee instability, not patellar instability. The case also states no evidence of patellar apprehension or instability.Option D is incorrect because LET addresses lateral-sided rotatory instability, not medial collateral ligament healing or valgus instability.Option E is incorrect because LET is a ligamentous procedure, not directly for meniscal tears. The lateral meniscus was intact in this patient.

Question 11: The patient's history includes a sudden deceleration with a pivoting motion on a planted foot, followed by a valgus collapse of the knee, and he reported hearing a distinct 'pop.' This mechanism is highly characteristic of an ACL rupture. Which of the following statements accurately describes the biomechanical cascade leading to this injury?

• A: The foot becomes fixed, and the femur externally rotates over a fixed, internally rotated tibia, applying a varus moment.
• B: The foot becomes fixed, and the femur internally rotates over a fixed, externally rotated tibia, applying a valgus moment.
• C: A direct blow to the anterior tibia causes hyperextension and rupture of the ACL.
• D: A fall onto a flexed knee with the foot plantarflexed causes posterior displacement of the tibia.
• E: Repetitive microtrauma from chronic overuse leads to gradual degeneration and eventual rupture of the ACL.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BThe case provides a detailed description of the biomechanical cascade: 'The biomechanical cascade typically involves the athlete attempting to change direction rapidly. The foot becomes fixed to the playing surface... As the athlete decelerates and internally rotates the femur over a fixed, externally rotated tibia, a significant valgus moment is applied to the knee joint. This complex loading pattern overwhelms the tensile capacity of the anterior cruciate ligament, often resulting in mid-substance rupture...'Option A is incorrect because it describes external rotation of the femur over an internally rotated tibia and a varus moment, which is not the classic ACL mechanism described.Option C is incorrect because a direct blow causing hyperextension is a different mechanism, often associated with PCL or multiligamentous injuries, but not the primary non-contact pivoting mechanism.Option D is incorrect because a fall onto a flexed knee with the foot plantarflexed is the classic mechanism for a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury.Option E is incorrect because this describes a degenerative process, whereas the patient experienced an acute, traumatic injury.

Question 12: A 28-year-old right-hand dominant carpenter sustains a laceration to his left ring finger while using a power saw. On examination, he is unable to actively flex his DIP joint, and his PIP joint flexion is significantly weakened compared to his uninjured digits. Sensation is intact. Radiographs show no bony injury. He is scheduled for surgical repair within 24 hours. Based on the provided case information, which of the following statements regarding his injury and initial management is MOST accurate?

• A: The injury is most likely located in Verdan's Zone I, involving only the FDP tendon.
• B: The primary goal of rehabilitation will be to prevent rerupture by maintaining strict immobilization for 6 weeks.
• C: The A2 and A4 pulleys are the most critical to preserve, and repair of both FDS and FDP is generally recommended in this zone if technically feasible.
• D: The typical critical threshold for a secure repair allowing early active mobilization is less than 20 Newtons of tensile strength.
• E: A Brunner zig-zag incision is contraindicated in this area due to the risk of neurovascular injury.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The patient's inability to actively flex the DIP joint indicates a laceration of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus (FDP) tendon, as the FDP is solely responsible for DIP flexion. Weakened PIP joint flexion, despite some residual motion, suggests involvement of the Flexor Digitorum Superficialis (FDS) tendon, which is the primary flexor of the PIP joint. The ring finger is a common site for flexor tendon injuries. Given both FDP and FDS involvement, the injury is most likely in Zone II (from the A1 pulley to the FDS insertion), also known as "No Man's Land."Option C is correct: The case explicitly states that the A2 and A4 pulleys are considered biomechanically most critical for maintaining function, and their disruption can lead to significant bowstringing. It also notes that in Zone II, if both FDS and FDP are lacerated, repair of both tendons is generally recommended, especially if more than 50% of the FDS slips are involved, provided it does not add significant bulk.Option A is incorrect: Zone I involves only the FDP, distal to the FDS insertion. Since both FDS and FDP appear to be involved (DIP and PIP flexion deficits), the injury is more consistent with Zone II.Option B is incorrect: While preventing rerupture is a goal, the case emphasizes that post-operative rehabilitation involves controlled motion protocols (e.g., Duran, Kleinert, or Early Active Motion) to minimize adhesion formation, not strict immobilization for 6 weeks, which would lead to severe stiffness.Option D is incorrect: The case states that the typical critical threshold for a secure repair, allowing early active mobilization protocols, is considered to be greater than 45-50 Newtons (N) of tensile strength. 20 N is insufficient for early active motion.Option E is incorrect: The Brunner zig-zag incision is described as the most common and preferred approach for flexor tendon repairs in the digits because it crosses flexion creases obliquely, preventing scar contracture, and allows adequate exposure while protecting neurovascular structures with careful dissection. It is not contraindicated.

Question 13: A 35-year-old construction worker presents to the emergency department 4 weeks after sustaining a deep laceration to his dominant index finger. He initially delayed seeking medical attention due to personal reasons. On examination, he has a complete loss of active flexion at both the PIP and DIP joints of the index finger. The wound is clean and well-healed. Passive range of motion is significantly limited due to stiffness. Based on the case, what is the MOST appropriate management strategy for this patient?

• A: Immediate primary repair of the flexor tendons using a 6-strand core suture technique.
• B: Delayed primary repair within the next week, followed by an early active motion protocol.
• C: A staged flexor tendon reconstruction using a Hunter rod (silastic implant).
• D: Aggressive hand therapy with passive range of motion exercises to restore flexibility before considering surgery.
• E: Excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys to facilitate tendon retrieval and repair.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The patient presents 4 weeks post-injury with complete loss of active flexion and significant passive stiffness. The case states that "Prolonged Delay: Beyond 3-4 weeks, significant tendon retraction, muscle contracture, and fibrosis can make primary repair impossible without excessive tension. Tendon grafting or two-stage reconstruction using a Hunter rod (silastic implant) may be necessary."Option C is correct: Given the 4-week delay and likely significant tendon retraction and fibrosis, a primary repair is unlikely to be feasible without excessive tension, which would lead to repair failure. A staged flexor tendon reconstruction using a Hunter rod (silastic implant) is the most appropriate approach for chronic tears with significant retraction and fibrosis, as outlined in the Indications & Contraindications table.Option A is incorrect: Immediate primary repair is indicated for acute lacerations (within 7-10 days, or up to 3 weeks for delayed primary repair). At 4 weeks, the conditions for primary repair are typically no longer met.Option B is incorrect: Delayed primary repair is generally feasible up to 3 weeks. Beyond this, the challenges of retraction and fibrosis make it less viable.Option D is incorrect: While hand therapy is crucial post-operatively, it cannot restore tendon continuity. Attempting aggressive passive range of motion without addressing the tendon laceration would be ineffective and potentially harmful.Option E is incorrect: Excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys is generally avoided as they are critical for preventing bowstringing. While some pulley incision may be necessary for access during acute repair, complete excision is not a standard approach, especially not to facilitate a repair that is already likely contraindicated due to delay.

Question 14: A 50-year-old patient undergoes flexor tendon repair in Zone II of the middle finger. Intraoperatively, the surgeon notes that both the FDS and FDP tendons are completely lacerated. After meticulous repair of both tendons, the surgeon is concerned about potential bulk at the repair site compromising gliding. According to the case, which of the following is a valid consideration in this specific scenario?

• A: Excise the FDP tendon entirely to prioritize FDS gliding and reduce bulk.
• B: Repair only one slip of the FDS tendon and excise the other to reduce bulk.
• C: Perform a tenodesis of the FDS to the FDP to ensure synchronized motion.
• D: Leave both tendons unrepaired and proceed directly to a staged reconstruction.
• E: Perform a complete excision of the A2 and A4 pulleys to accommodate the bulk.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BExplanation:The case discusses specific considerations for Zone II injuries, particularly regarding FDS repair when both tendons are lacerated. It states: "If both FDS and FDP are lacerated, repair of both tendons is generally recommended, especially if more than 50% of the FDS slips are involved. However, if the FDS repair adds significant bulk or impedes FDP gliding, one slip of the FDS can be excised to reduce bulk, or in some cases, the FDS may be excised entirely if the FDP is fully functional and its gliding needs to be prioritized. Current evidence often favors repair of both if technically feasible without excessive bulk."Option B is correct: This option directly aligns with the case's guidance for managing bulk in Zone II when both FDS and FDP are lacerated. Excising one slip of the FDS can reduce bulk while still providing some FDS function.Option A is incorrect: Excising the FDP entirely would result in a complete loss of DIP flexion, which is a critical function. The case suggests FDS excision if FDP gliding needs to be prioritized, not FDP excision.Option C is incorrect: Tenodesis of FDS to FDP is not a standard primary repair technique described in the case for acute lacerations.Option D is incorrect: Leaving both tendons unrepaired is not an appropriate primary management strategy for acute lacerations. A staged reconstruction is reserved for chronic cases or failed primary repairs.Option E is incorrect: The case strongly emphasizes the preservation of A2 and A4 pulleys due to their biomechanical importance. Complete excision would lead to significant bowstringing and loss of mechanical advantage, which is a major complication.

Question 15: A 42-year-old chef undergoes repair of a complete flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) laceration in Zone I of his small finger. Post-operatively, he is placed in a dorsal blocking splint and begins a controlled passive motion (Duran) protocol. Which of the following statements accurately describes a key principle or characteristic of the Duran protocol as outlined in the case?

• A: It involves active extension of the digits against dynamic rubber band traction.
• B: It relies on the patient actively contracting the repaired tendon to achieve flexion.
• C: It requires the patient to passively flex and extend the DIP and PIP joints using the uninjured hand.
• D: It is associated with a higher risk of rerupture compared to early active motion protocols.
• E: It typically allows for full active range of motion of the repaired digit within the first week.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The case provides a clear description of the Duran protocol under the "Post-Operative Rehabilitation Protocols" section.Option C is correct: The case states: "Duran Protocol (Controlled Passive Motion): Description: Passive flexion and extension of the DIP and PIP joints within the limits of the dorsal blocking splint, typically 10 repetitions, 4-5 times per day. The patient uses the uninjured hand to passively flex and extend the injured digit's IP joints. No active muscle contraction of the repaired tendon."Option A is incorrect: This describes a key feature of the Kleinert protocol, not Duran.Option B is incorrect: The Duran protocol is a controlled passive motion protocol, meaning there is "No active muscle contraction of the repaired tendon." Active contraction is characteristic of Early Active Motion protocols.Option D is incorrect: The case notes that Early Active Motion (EAM) protocols historically had slightly higher rerupture rates, but modern EAM protocols, when applied to adequately strong repairs, show comparable rerupture rates to passive protocols. Duran, being a passive protocol, is generally considered to have a lower immediate rerupture risk compared to early active protocols, though it carries a higher risk of stiffness if not performed diligently.Option E is incorrect: The protective phase, which includes the Duran protocol, aims to protect the repair and minimize adhesions. Full active range of motion is a gradual process achieved over weeks to months, not within the first week.

Question 16: A 22-year-old college athlete sustains a complete laceration of the FDP tendon in Zone I of his long finger. During surgical repair, the surgeon plans to use a multi-strand core suture technique to maximize tensile strength and allow for early active mobilization. Which of the following core suture techniques, as described in the case, is known for providing high tensile strength and resistance to gapping, often favored for early active motion protocols?

• A: Modified Kessler (2-strand)
• B: Pennington (2-strand)
• C: Doble-Modified Kessler (4-strand)
• D: Simple running epitendinous suture only
• E: Single horizontal mattress suture

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The question asks about core suture techniques known for high tensile strength, suitable for early active motion. The provided image also depicts a multi-strand core suture repair.Option C is correct: The case explicitly states under "Core Suture Techniques" that "Doble-Modified Kessler (4-strand): Two modified Kessler sutures placed 90 degrees apart. This significantly increases strength." It also mentions that modern techniques typically involve 4- to 6-strand repairs, and that a 4- to 6-strand core suture combined with an epitendinous repair is a prerequisite for successful early active motion protocols, achieving strengths of 45-70 N.Option A is incorrect: The Modified Kessler (2-strand) is described as "Historically popular, but often insufficient for early active motion without significant gapping."Option B is incorrect: The Pennington (2-strand) is also described as a 2-strand technique with "similar limitations" to the modified Kessler.Option D is incorrect: An epitendinous suture is applied after the core suture and primarily smooths the repair site and adds 10-50% to tensile strength, but it is not the primary core suture responsible for the majority of tensile strength.Option E is incorrect: A single horizontal mattress suture is a basic suture pattern and would not provide the multi-strand strength required for early active motion protocols.

Question 17: A 60-year-old diabetic patient undergoes flexor tendon repair of the ring finger. Three weeks post-operatively, he presents with increasing pain, swelling, redness, and purulent discharge from the surgical site. He also has limited active and passive range of motion. Based on the case, what is the MOST appropriate initial management for this complication?

• A: Initiate aggressive hand therapy with active range of motion exercises to prevent stiffness.
• B: Administer oral antibiotics and monitor for improvement over the next week.
• C: Surgical debridement, IV antibiotics, wound culture, and possible tendon debridement.
• D: Immediate re-exploration and re-repair of the tendon due to suspected rerupture.
• E: Application of a dynamic traction splint to improve tendon gliding.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The patient's symptoms (increasing pain, swelling, redness, purulent discharge) are classic signs of a deep surgical site infection. The case addresses "Infection" as a complication.Option C is correct: The case states under "Complications & Management" for deep/purulent infection: "Surgical debridement, IV antibiotics, wound culture, possible tendon debridement/excision (leading to reconstruction)." This aggressive approach is necessary to control the infection and prevent further damage to the tendon and surrounding tissues.Option A is incorrect: Aggressive hand therapy would be contraindicated in the presence of an active infection, as it could worsen inflammation, spread the infection, and potentially lead to rerupture due to compromised tissue strength.Option B is incorrect: While antibiotics are necessary, oral antibiotics alone are often insufficient for deep or purulent infections following tendon repair. Surgical debridement is crucial to remove infected tissue and foreign material (suture).Option D is incorrect: While rerupture is a possible complication, the primary signs here point to infection. Re-repairing an infected tendon is highly likely to fail and worsen the infection. The infection must be controlled first.Option E is incorrect: A dynamic traction splint is part of rehabilitation for tendon gliding, but it is not appropriate in the setting of an acute infection.

Question 18: A 25-year-old factory worker sustains a complete laceration of the FDP tendon in Zone I of his index finger. During the surgical repair, after placing a 4-strand core suture, the surgeon proceeds to apply an epitendinous suture. According to the case, what is the primary purpose of this epitendinous suture?

• A: To provide the majority of the repair's tensile strength and resistance to gapping.
• B: To prevent muscle contracture in the forearm.
• C: To smooth the repair site, reduce friction, and add 10-50% to the tensile strength.
• D: To re-establish the fibro-osseous pulley system.
• E: To facilitate early active extension against dynamic traction.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The case clearly outlines the purpose of the epitendinous suture under "Tendon Repair Principles."Option C is correct: The case states: "Epitendinous Suture: Purpose: Smoothes the repair site, reducing friction and adhesion formation. Adds 10-50% to the tensile strength of the repair, depending on the technique. Closes the tendon sheath, preventing the core suture from catching on surrounding tissues."Option A is incorrect: The core suture is responsible for the majority of the repair's tensile strength and resistance to gapping, not the epitendinous suture.Option B is incorrect: The epitendinous suture is applied at the repair site in the digit, not to prevent muscle contracture in the forearm.Option D is incorrect: The fibro-osseous pulley system is a separate anatomical structure. While pulleys may be incised for access and sometimes repaired, the epitendinous suture's role is not to re-establish the pulley system itself.Option E is incorrect: This describes a function related to dynamic traction protocols (like Kleinert) and is not the primary purpose of the epitendinous suture.

Question 19: A 30-year-old patient undergoes flexor tendon repair of the middle finger in Zone II. Post-operatively, the hand therapist initiates an Early Active Motion (EAM) protocol. Which of the following is a key characteristic or advantage of EAM protocols, as highlighted in the case, compared to controlled passive motion protocols?

• A: They are typically associated with a significantly higher rate of tendon rerupture, even with modern repairs.
• B: They require strict continuous immobilization of the repaired digit for the first 4-6 weeks.
• C: They involve controlled, gentle active muscle contraction, leading to greater tendon excursion and theoretically reduced adhesions.
• D: They are primarily used for patients with very weak repairs (less than 20 N tensile strength).
• E: They rely solely on external forces to move the injured digit, with no active muscle contraction.

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The case discusses the advantages and characteristics of Early Active Motion (EAM) protocols in the "Post-Operative Rehabilitation Protocols" section.Option C is correct: The case states: "Early Active Motion (EAM) Protocols... Rationale: Active muscle contraction leads to greater tendon excursion, theoretically reducing adhesions more effectively and leading to faster return of active range of motion." It also mentions that EAM protocols generally demonstrate superior outcomes in terms of active ROM and quicker return to function compared to CPM.Option A is incorrect: The case notes: "While some early EAM protocols had slightly higher rerupture rates historically, modern EAM protocols, when applied to adequately strong repairs, show comparable rerupture rates to passive protocols." So, a significantly higher rate is not accurate for modern EAM.Option B is incorrect: EAM protocols involve controlled motion, not strict continuous immobilization. Immobilization is characteristic of older, less effective protocols or for very tenuous repairs.Option D is incorrect: EAM protocols require a strong repair (e.g., 4-6 strand core suture with epitendinous repair) with tensile strength typically greater than 45-50 N, not weak repairs.Option E is incorrect: This describes controlled passive motion (CPM) protocols like Duran, not EAM. EAM involves controlled active muscle contraction.

Question 20: A 48-year-old patient presents with a "jersey finger" injury, where he forcibly hyperextended his ring finger while grabbing an opponent's jersey, resulting in an avulsion of the FDP tendon from its insertion. This injury is classified as a Zone I flexor tendon injury. According to the case, what is a common method for repairing this specific type of injury?

• A: Primary repair of the FDP to the FDS tendon.
• B: Reattaching the FDP to the distal phalanx using techniques like a pull-out suture or suture anchors.
• C: Excision of the avulsed FDP tendon and observation.
• D: A two-stage reconstruction using a Hunter rod.
• E: Repair of the FDP to the A2 pulley.

Explanation: Correct Answer: BExplanation:The case specifically addresses Zone I injuries, including FDP avulsions (jersey finger), under "Specific Considerations by Zone."Option B is correct: The case states: "Zone I (FDP Avulsions): Often involve a bony fragment (e.g., 'jersey finger'). Repair involves reattaching the FDP to the distal phalanx (e.g., using a pull-out suture technique through the nail plate, suture anchors, or direct repair if a large bony fragment is present)."Option A is incorrect: Primary repair of FDP to FDS is not the standard for a Zone I FDP avulsion. The FDS inserts more proximally on the middle phalanx.Option C is incorrect: Excision of the FDP would result in permanent loss of DIP flexion, which is not the goal of treatment.Option D is incorrect: A two-stage reconstruction using a Hunter rod is typically reserved for chronic, irreparable tears or failed primary repairs, not acute avulsions.Option E is incorrect: The A2 pulley is located on the proximal phalanx, and repairing the FDP to it would not restore DIP joint function.

Question 21: A 33-year-old patient undergoes flexor tendon repair of the small finger. Post-operatively, the surgeon and hand therapist decide to implement a Kleinert protocol. Which of the following is a characteristic feature of the Kleinert protocol, as described in the case?

• A: It involves active wrist extension to facilitate passive finger flexion (tenodesis effect).
• B: It utilizes a dynamic traction system to passively flex the digits, with active extension against resistance.
• C: It requires the patient to actively hold a passively placed flexion position for several seconds.
• D: It is a strict immobilization protocol with no active or passive motion for the first 3 weeks.
• E: It is primarily used for repairs with very low tensile strength (e.g., <10 N).

Explanation: Correct Answer: BExplanation:The case provides a clear description of the Kleinert protocol under the "Post-Operative Rehabilitation Protocols" section.Option B is correct: The case states: "Kleinart Protocol (Controlled Passive Motion with Dynamic Traction): Description: Utilizes a dynamic traction system (rubber band attached to the fingernail and a wrist strap) to passively flex the digits into the palm. The patient actively extends the digits against the resistance of the rubber band to the limits of the dorsal blocking splint."Option A is incorrect: This describes a synergistic wrist motion exercise, which is part of some Early Active Motion (EAM) protocols, not Kleinert.Option C is incorrect: This describes a "place and hold" exercise, which is also part of some EAM protocols, not Kleinert.Option D is incorrect: The Kleinert protocol is a controlled motion protocol, not strict immobilization.Option E is incorrect: While Kleinert is a passive motion protocol, it still requires a reasonably strong repair. The case does not specify a very low tensile strength requirement for Kleinert; rather, it emphasizes that EAM protocols require strong repairs (45-50 N).

Question 22: A 29-year-old patient presents with a complete flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) laceration in Zone II of the ring finger. During pre-operative planning, the surgeon emphasizes the importance of a bloodless field and precise visualization. Which of the following equipment is highlighted in the case as critical for precise tendon identification, suture placement, and neurovascular repair?

• A: Large bone-holding clamps
• B: Standard operating room headlights without magnification
• C: Loupe magnification (2.5x to 4.5x)
• D: A pneumatic lower extremity tourniquet
• E: Absorbable sutures for core repair

Explanation: Correct Answer: CExplanation:The case details the necessary equipment for flexor tendon repair under "Pre-Operative Planning & Patient Positioning."Option C is correct: The case states: "Equipment: Loupe magnification (2.5x to 4.5x) is critical for precise tendon identification, suture placement, and neurovascular repair."Option A is incorrect: Large bone-holding clamps are typically used in fracture fixation, not for delicate flexor tendon repair.Option B is incorrect: While headlights provide light, the case specifically emphasizes the critical need for magnification for precision, implying standard headlights alone are insufficient.Option D is incorrect: A pneumatic tourniquet is used, but it is applied to the upper arm for a bloodless field in hand surgery, not the lower extremity.Option E is incorrect: The case specifies: "Non-absorbable monofilament sutures (e.g., 3-0, 4-0, 5-0 Prolene or Ethibond) for core repair," not absorbable sutures.

✖

⚠️ Unanswered Questions

You have unanswered questions in this module. Are you sure you want to submit?

Return Submit Exam

ABOS

ABOS Part I Comprehensive Review - Batch 79

Item 0 of 22

Study Mode Exam Mode

Score: 0%

Complete Module & Score

Module Results

0%

Overall Score

0

Correct

0

Incorrect

Review Incorrect Retake Module