Introduction and Epidemiology
The shoulder girdle represents a highly complex and mechanically sophisticated structural unit that serves as the primary mechanical linkage between the appendicular upper extremity and the axial skeleton. It is fundamentally composed of four osseous structures—the sternum, clavicle, scapula, and proximal humerus—which function in concert to position the arm in space. This dynamic positioning system is essential for allowing complex human interaction with the environment, facilitating a massive range of motion necessary for activities encompassing reaching, lifting, and overhead throwing.

From an epidemiological standpoint, injuries to the shoulder girdle are exceedingly common in both high-energy trauma and low-energy osteoporotic falls. Clavicle fractures account for approximately 2.6% to 4% of all adult fractures and up to 44% of all shoulder girdle injuries. Acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations represent nearly 9% of shoulder girdle injuries, predominantly affecting young, active males participating in contact sports. Scapula fractures are relatively rare, comprising only 1% of all fractures and 3% to 5% of shoulder girdle injuries, typically resulting from high-energy blunt force trauma such as motor vehicle collisions. Sternoclavicular (SC) joint dislocations are the least common, representing less than 3% of shoulder girdle injuries, but carry significant morbidity and potential mortality when displaced posteriorly due to the proximity of the mediastinal great vessels.

Understanding the intricate interplay between the osseous anatomy, capsuloligamentous restraints, and dynamic muscular stabilizers is paramount for the orthopedic surgeon. Mastery of this anatomy dictates the success of both non-operative management strategies and complex surgical reconstructions.
Surgical Anatomy and Biomechanics
The functional integrity of the shoulder girdle relies on three major true articulations—the sternoclavicular (SC) joint, the acromioclavicular (AC) joint, and the glenohumeral (GH) joint—alongside two vital physiologic spaces: the subacromial space and the scapulothoracic articulation.

Osteology of the Sternum
The sternum serves as the singular osseous connection point of the appendicular skeleton to the axial skeleton via the SC joint. The bone is composed of three distinct anatomical parts: the manubrium, the body, and the xiphoid process. The sternal notch (jugular notch) is a palpable depression situated centrally between the two SC joints. The SC joints themselves are located at the superolateral corners of the manubrium, presenting as relatively shallow notches that provide minimal inherent osseous stability.

The body and manubrium serve as critical insertion points for the costal cartilages of ribs one through seven. The manubriosternal junction, or Angle of Louis, is an important topographic landmark corresponding to the level of the second costal cartilage. Understanding the role of the SC articulation is vital in shoulder biomechanics, as virtually all scapulothoracic motion requires synchronous rotation, elevation, and retraction at the SC joint.
Osteology of the Clavicle
The clavicle is an S-shaped tubular bone that spans from the sternum to the acromion, acting as a crucial biomechanical strut to support the arm for activities performed away from the body. Morphologically, it is flat near the lateral third but becomes increasingly convex and tubular medially.

Developmentally, the clavicle is unique. It is the first bone to begin ossifying (intramembranous ossification) at approximately 5 weeks in utero. Conversely, the medial epiphysis of the clavicle is the last ossification center in the body to fuse, typically occurring between 23 and 25 years of life. This developmental timeline is clinically significant, as presumed SC joint dislocations in young adults are frequently physeal fractures of the medial clavicle.
The cross-sectional anatomy of the clavicle varies significantly along its length, which has profound implications for intramedullary fixation and plate contouring. At the sternal end, the dimensions are approximately 23 mm by 22 mm. In the diaphysis, it narrows to a dense cortical tube measuring roughly 12 mm by 12 mm. At the lateral end, it widens and flattens to 21 mm by 11 mm. Furthermore, the clavicle serves as an osseous shield, providing protection for the underlying neurovascular structures (the brachial plexus and subclavian vessels) and providing a mechanical advantage for the myofascial sleeve surrounding it.

Osteology of the Scapula
The scapula is a highly complex, triangular flat bone featuring multiple prominences that serve as points of fixation for seventeen different upper extremity and axial muscles. It possesses a curved anterior contour (the subscapular fossa) designed to articulate smoothly with the convex posterior rib cage.
The posterior surface is divided by the prominent spine of the scapula into the supraspinatus and infraspinatus fossae. The spine continues laterally to form the acromion, which articulates with the distal clavicle. Anteriorly, the coracoid process projects anteriorly and laterally. The coracoid is a critical surgical landmark, often referred to as the "lighthouse of the shoulder," guiding the surgeon away from the perilous neurovascular structures located medially. It serves as the origin for the short head of the biceps and coracobrachialis, and the insertion for the pectoralis minor, as well as the attachment site for the coracoclavicular and coracoacromial ligaments.

Articulations and Ligamentous Constraints
The Sternoclavicular (SC) joint is a diarthrodial saddle joint. Due to the incongruity between the large medial clavicle and the shallow sternal notch, stability is almost entirely dependent on ligamentous structures. The joint contains a robust intra-articular fibrocartilaginous disc that resists medial displacement of the clavicle. The primary restraints include the anterior and posterior SC ligaments (with the posterior being significantly stronger, resisting posterior translation) and the extra-articular costoclavicular (rhomboid) ligament, which anchors the medial clavicle to the first rib.

The Acromioclavicular (AC) joint is a diarthrodial joint stabilized by static and dynamic restraints. The static restraints are divided into the AC ligaments and the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments. The AC ligaments (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior) provide primary restraint in the anteroposterior direction, with the superior AC ligament being the most robust. The CC ligaments consist of the conoid and trapezoid ligaments. The conoid is medial and posterior, shaped like an inverted cone, and is the primary restraint to anterior and superior loading. The trapezoid is lateral and anterior, providing primary restraint against axial compression. Together, the CC ligaments provide the primary restraint in the craniocaudal direction.

The Glenohumeral (GH) joint is a multiaxial ball-and-socket joint characterized by a profound mismatch between the large humeral head and the shallow glenoid fossa, prioritizing mobility over inherent osseous stability. Stability is conferred dynamically by the rotator cuff musculature and statically by the glenoid labrum and the capsuloligamentous complex, including the superior, middle, and inferior glenohumeral ligaments.

Indications and Contraindications
Surgical decision-making for shoulder girdle pathology requires a careful assessment of fracture morphology, displacement, patient physiological age, and functional demands. The concept of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex (SSSC), described by Goss, is critical here. The SSSC is a bone-and-soft-tissue ring composed of the glenoid, coracoid process, CC ligaments, distal clavicle, AC joint, and acromial process. Double disruptions of this ring (e.g., a displaced distal clavicle fracture combined with a coracoid fracture) render the construct highly unstable and typically mandate surgical fixation.

Operative vs Non Operative Management
| Pathology | Non-Operative Indications | Operative Indications |
|---|---|---|
| Midshaft Clavicle Fracture | Non-displaced or minimally displaced (< 100% translation); shortening < 1.5 cm. | Open fractures; skin tenting/impending necrosis; neurovascular compromise; shortening > 2 cm; > 100% displacement; floating shoulder. |
| Distal Clavicle Fracture | Neer Type I, III, IV (pediatric). | Neer Type IIA, IIB, V (involving CC ligament disruption or significant displacement). |
| AC Joint Separation | Rockwood Types I, II, and most Type III (especially in non-laborers). | Rockwood Types IV, V, VI; Type III in elite overhead athletes or heavy laborers (controversial). |
| Scapula Body/Neck Fracture | Minimal displacement; medial/lateral translation < 20 mm; angular deformity < 40 degrees. | Medial/lateral translation > 20 mm; angular deformity > 40 degrees; intra-articular glenoid step-off > 4 mm; double disruption of SSSC. |
| SC Joint Dislocation | Anterior dislocations (often left unreduced if asymptomatic); sprains. | Posterior dislocations causing mediastinal compression (dysphagia, dyspnea, venous congestion); failure of closed reduction in posterior dislocations. |

Contraindications to surgical intervention include active surgical site infection, severe medical comorbidities precluding anesthesia, and non-ambulatory patients with minimal functional demands. Relative contraindications include severe osteopenia where hardware purchase is questionable, though modern locked plating techniques have expanded operative indications in this demographic.
Pre Operative Planning and Patient Positioning
Thorough preoperative planning is predicated on obtaining high-quality orthogonal imaging. Standard trauma series for the shoulder girdle include a true anteroposterior (Grashey) view, a scapular Y view, and an axillary lateral view.
For clavicle fractures, a standard AP and a 20-degree cephalad tilt view are required to accurately assess superior/inferior displacement. For AC joint injuries, a Zanca view (AP with 10-15 degrees cephalad tilt using 50% standard penetration) is optimal for visualizing the joint without superimposition of the scapular spine. Bilateral weighted views for AC separations are largely historical and rarely alter surgical decision-making.

When evaluating complex scapula fractures or intra-articular glenoid fractures, a fine-cut Computed Tomography (CT) scan with 3-dimensional surface-rendered reconstructions is mandatory. This allows for precise mapping of fracture lines, assessment of glenoid articular step-off, and templating of internal fixation.
Patient Positioning Considerations
Positioning for shoulder girdle surgery generally falls into two categories: the beach chair (semi-fowler) position and the lateral decubitus position.
The Beach Chair Position is favored for clavicle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), AC joint reconstructions, and anterior approaches to the glenohumeral joint (deltopectoral approach). The patient is positioned with the torso elevated 30 to 45 degrees. A bump is placed under the medial border of the scapula to protract the shoulder girdle. The head must be meticulously secured in a neutral position to avoid cervical spine hyperextension or lateral flexion, which can cause brachial plexus traction neurapraxia. A critical anesthetic consideration in the beach chair position is the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion; blood pressure must be carefully monitored, ideally with an arterial line zeroed at the level of the external auditory meatus.

The Lateral Decubitus Position is frequently utilized for posterior approaches to the scapula (Judet approach) and occasionally for arthroscopic procedures. The patient is placed on a beanbag with all bony prominences padded. An axillary roll is placed just caudal to the dependent axilla to prevent compression of the dependent brachial plexus. The operative arm is placed in a sterile traction sleeve. This position provides excellent access to the posterior scapula and allows for longitudinal and lateral traction to distract the glenohumeral joint.
Detailed Surgical Approach and Technique
Surgical approaches to the shoulder girdle must respect the complex internervous planes and the proximity of major neurovascular structures.

The Deltopectoral Approach
The deltopectoral approach is the workhorse extensile exposure for proximal humerus fractures, anterior glenohumeral instability, and shoulder arthroplasty. It utilizes a true internervous plane between the deltoid (innervated by the axillary nerve) and the pectoralis major (innervated by the medial and lateral pectoral nerves).
- Incision: A linear incision is made starting from the tip of the coracoid process, extending distally and laterally toward the deltoid tuberosity, following the line of the deltopectoral groove.
- Superficial Dissection: The subcutaneous tissue is divided to expose the cephalic vein, which serves as the landmark for the deltopectoral interval. The vein is typically retracted laterally with the deltoid to preserve its major venous tributaries, though medial retraction is acceptable if lateral tributaries are sparse.
- Deep Dissection: The clavipectoral fascia is incised lateral to the conjoint tendon (short head of biceps and coracobrachialis). The conjoint tendon is retracted medially. The surgeon visualizes the subscapularis tendon and the anterior humeral circumflex vessels (the "three sisters") at the inferior border of the subscapularis.
- Joint Access: Depending on the pathology, the subscapularis can be tenotomized, peeled off the lesser tuberosity (lesser tuberosity osteotomy), or split longitudinally to access the glenohumeral joint.

Superior Approach to the Clavicle
This approach is utilized for ORIF of midshaft and distal clavicle fractures.
- Incision: An incision is made centered over the fracture site. Historically, incisions were placed directly over the superior border of the clavicle; however, an infraclavicular incision (placed slightly anteroinferiorly) is now preferred to prevent the surgical scar from resting directly over the prominent hardware, reducing postoperative irritation.
- Superficial Dissection: The platysma is incised in line with the skin incision. Meticulous care must be taken to identify and preserve the supraclavicular nerves (branches of the cervical plexus, C3-C4), which cross the clavicle from superior to inferior. Sacrifice of these nerves leads to a predictable area of numbness over the anterior chest wall.
- Deep Dissection: The clavipectoral fascia is incised. The fracture site is exposed by elevating the periosteum minimally to preserve the fracture hematoma and blood supply. The subclavius muscle acts as a protective buffer between the clavicle and the underlying subclavian vessels and brachial plexus; dissection inferior to the subclavius must be strictly avoided.
- Fixation: The fracture is reduced using reduction forceps. Fixation is typically achieved with a pre-contoured superior or anteroinferior locking compression plate. At least three bicortical screws (six cortices) are required on each side of the fracture.

Posterior Approach to the Scapula
The classic Judet approach or its modern modifications (extensile posterior approach) are utilized for intra-articular glenoid fractures and complex scapular body fractures.
- Incision: A boomerang-shaped incision is made along the spine of the scapula and extending distally along the medial border of the scapula.
- Superficial Dissection: The deltoid origin is detached from the scapular spine and retracted laterally. The trapezius insertion may need to be partially elevated.
- Deep Dissection: The interval between the infraspinatus (suprascapular nerve) and teres minor (axillary nerve) is an internervous plane that can be utilized for limited access. For broader access, the infraspinatus can be elevated from medial to lateral off the scapular body, taking care to protect the suprascapular nerve and vessels as they pass through the spinoglenoid notch.
- Fixation: Reduction of the glenoid articular surface is prioritized. Fixation is achieved with small fragment plates placed along the strong osseous pillars of the scapula—the lateral border and the scapular spine.

Complications and Management
Surgical interventions around the shoulder girdle carry specific risks due to the proximity of critical neurovascular structures and the unique biomechanical forces exerted on the implants.
Common Complications and Salvage Strategies
| Complication | Incidence | Etiology / Risk Factors | Management / Salvage Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Symptomatic Hardware | 15% - 30% (Clavicle ORIF) | Subcutaneous nature of the superior clavicle; prominent screw heads. | Hardware removal after radiographic confirmation of solid union (typically > 12-18 months post-op). |
| Nonunion | 1% - 5% (Operative Clavicle) | Inadequate fixation rigidity; extensive periosteal stripping; smoking; infection. | Revision ORIF with autologous iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG); optimization of host biology (smoking cessation). |
| Supraclavicular Nerve Neuroma | 5% - 10% | Iatrogenic transection or entrapment in scar tissue during clavicle approaches. | Often self-limiting or managed with gabapentinoids. Refractory cases may require surgical excision and burying the nerve stump into muscle. |
| Adhesive Capsulitis | 5% - 15% | Prolonged postoperative immobilization; failure to initiate early passive range of motion. | Aggressive physical therapy; intra-articular corticosteroid injections; arthroscopic capsular release for refractory cases. |
| Hardware Failure / Loss of Reduction | 2% - 5% | Premature weight-bearing; unrecognized SSSC double disruptions; osteoporotic bone. | Revision internal fixation, often utilizing longer plates, dual plating techniques, or augmentation with coracoclavicular fixation (e.g., suture buttons). |
| Neurovascular Injury | < 1% | Plunging drills/screws inferior to the clavicle; aggressive retraction near the brachial plexus. | Immediate vascular surgery consultation for expanding hematoma/ischemia. Neurologic injuries are typically neurapraxias managed with observation and EMG at 6 weeks. |

Post Operative Rehabilitation Protocols
Rehabilitation following shoulder girdle surgery must balance the protection of the surgical repair with the prevention of glenohumeral and scapulothoracic stiffness. A phased approach is universally adopted, though specific timelines vary based on fracture morphology and fixation rigidity.
Phase I: Protection and Tissue Healing (Weeks 0-4)
The primary goal is to protect the osseous fixation and soft tissue repair while minimizing pain and inflammation. The upper extremity is typically immobilized in a sling. Active range of motion (AROM) of the elbow, wrist, and hand is initiated immediately to prevent distal stiffness and encourage venous return. Pendulum exercises are often permitted for glenohumeral mobility. Passive range of motion (PROM) is instituted within safe zones (e.g., forward elevation limited to 90 degrees, external rotation limited to 30 degrees) to prevent adhesive capsulitis, particularly after proximal humerus or glenoid fixation.
Phase II: Early Active Motion (Weeks 4-8)
Once radiographic evidence of early callus formation is observed, the sling is discontinued. Active-assisted range of motion (AAROM) transitions to full AROM. Scapular mobilization is critical during this phase. Scapular dyskinesis—alteration in the normal static or dynamic position of the scapula—is a common sequela of shoulder girdle trauma. Rehabilitation focuses on re-establishing the normal force couples of the scapula, specifically strengthening the serratus anterior and lower trapezius while stretching the pectoralis minor.
Phase III: Strengthening and Return to Function (Weeks 8-12+)
Upon confirmation of clinical and radiographic union, progressive resistance exercises are initiated. Strengthening focuses on the rotator cuff and periscapular stabilizers. Return to heavy labor or contact sports is generally delayed until 4 to 6 months postoperatively, contingent upon the recovery of near-normal strength (typically > 85% of the contralateral limb) and full functional range of motion.

Summary of Key Literature and Guidelines
The evolution of shoulder girdle trauma management has been heavily influenced by several landmark studies and consensus guidelines.
Regarding clavicle fractures, the Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society (COTS) published a landmark multicenter randomized controlled trial in 2007 comparing non-operative management versus plate fixation for completely displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The study demonstrated that operative fixation resulted in improved functional outcomes, higher rates of union, and lower rates of symptomatic malunion compared to sling immobilization. This shifted the paradigm toward operative intervention for displaced fractures, though recent literature suggests a more nuanced approach, balancing the risks of surgery (hardware removal, infection) against the benefits.
For AC joint injuries, the Rockwood classification remains the standard for guiding treatment. While Types I and II are universally managed non-operatively, and Types IV, V, and VI require surgical reconstruction (often utilizing coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques with allograft or cortical button devices), the management of Type III injuries remains controversial. Current guidelines generally recommend an initial trial of non-operative management for Type III injuries, with delayed reconstruction reserved for patients who develop chronic pain or unacceptable scapular dyskinesis.
The concept of the Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex (SSSC), introduced by Goss in 1993, remains a foundational biomechanical model for evaluating complex shoulder girdle trauma. Guidelines dictate that single disruptions of the ring are typically stable and can be managed non-operatively, whereas double disruptions compromise the suspensory function of the shoulder girdle, leading to inferior translation of the glenohumeral joint and necessitating surgical stabilization of at least one, and sometimes both, of the disrupted elements to restore anatomical alignment and biomechanical integrity.
Clinical & Radiographic Imaging




















Detailed Chapters & Topics
Dive deeper into specialized chapters regarding the-shoulder-girdle-anatomy-and-function