العربية
Part of the Master Guide

Distal Radius Fractures: Epidemiology, Surgical Anatomy, Biomechanics, & Complication Management

Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion

30 مارس 2026 22 min read 92 Views
Illustration of distal radius malunion - Dr. Mohammed Hutaif

Key Takeaway

Your ultimate guide to Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion starts here. Distal radius malunion is defined as malalignment of a healed distal radius fracture, accompanied by dysfunction. This dysfunction may include loss of motion, strength, or pain. While not all malalignment causes symptoms, significant deformity can lead to issues such as carpal malalignment, ulnocarpal impaction, or problems with the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ).

DEFINITION

Distal radius malunion is best defined as malalignment associated with dysfunction. Malalignment does not always result in dysfunction. In particular, the vast majority of older, low-demand patients function very well with deformity. Dysfunction can include loss of motion, loss of strength, or pain. 1, 2, 5 Pain can be the most difficult to associate with deformity. Osteotomy for pain—as with any surgery for pain —is relatively unpredictable and should be undertaken with caution. Carpal malalignment, ulnocarpal impaction, and distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) malalignment are all potentially painful and can be variably addressed. The relationship between distal radius malunion and carpal tunnel syndrome is debated. Some surgeons claim a direct causal relationship as well as the ability to improve carpal tunnel syndrome with osteotomy alone. ## ANATOMY Loss of alignment can be measured on radiographs. Angulation of the articular surface on the lateral view is measured as the angle between a line connecting the dorsal and palmar lips of the distal radius articular surface on the lateral view and a line perpendicular to the radius shaft. Ulnarward inclination (often called radial inclination , a misnomer because the articular surface tilts toward the ulna) is measured as the angle between a line connecting the ulnar limit and the radial limit of the distal radius articular surface on the posteroanterior (PA) view and a line perpendicular to the radial shaft. Ulnar variance is a better measure of shortening of the radius than radial length. It is measured as the distance between two lines drawn perpendicular to the radial shaft on the PA view, one at the level of the most ulnar corner of the lunate facet and the other at the distal limit of the ulnar head. Positive ulnar variance means that the ulna is longer than the radius. Negative means the ulna is shorter. Loss of articular surface alignment can be measured on radiographs as gap, step, or subluxation. This is most accurately measured using computed tomography (CT) images ( FIG 1). Sources of variability in radiographic measurements include variation in the radiographs, imprecision in the measurement techniques, and imprecision in the selection of the points of reference. ## PATHOGENESIS Fractures of the distal radius heal rapidly. A malaligned healing fracture can be considered a malunion within 4 to 6 weeks of injury. Risk factors for fracture instability, loss of reduction, and malunion include age older than 60 years, more than 20 degrees of dorsal angulation, dorsal metaphyseal comminution, comminution extending to the volar metaphyseal cortex, associated fracture of the ulna, and displaced articular fracture. Risk factors for fracture instability include age, metaphyseal comminution, dorsal tilt, ulnar variance, and lack of functional independence. Manipulation of previously reduced fractures that redisplace in a cast or splint signifies instability and is not worthwhile. Limitations of various treatment techniques may contribute to creation of a malunion. Percutaneous pins alone may not be sufficient to maintain alignment when there is substantial metaphyseal comminution. External fixation alone without ancillary percutaneous pin fixation of the fracture Illustration 1 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion ---
FIG 1 • The arc method for measuring articular malalignment of the distal radius. The distance between B and D is the articular step, and the distance between A and C is the maximum articular ga (After Catalano LW III, Cole RJ, Gelberman RH, et al. Displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius: long-term results in young adults after open reduction and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79[9]:1290-1302.) 143 Early removal of pins or an external fixator. Settling of the fracture can also be observed after implant removal more than 6 weeks after injury, particularly when there is substantial metaphyseal comminution. Nonlocked plates may loosen in osteopenic metaphyseal bone. Complacence must be avoided. Many older patients desire optimal wrist alignment and function, and treatment decisions should not be made on chronologic age alone. ## NATURAL HISTORY Ulnar-sided wrist pain can improve for a year or more after fracture of the distal radius, so patience is warranted. Lack of forearm rotation may be related to capsular contracture or bony malalignment. For slight malunions, patience with exercises and rehabilitation is advisable. Although it is often stated that an extra-articular distal radius malunion leads to future arthrosis, there are no data to support this contention. After a recovery period of 1 to 2 years from fracture, the functional deficits seem fairly stable. Articular incongruity or subluxation in relatively nonarticular areas can be reasonably well tolerated, but in most cases, intra-articular incongruity will lead to arthrosis, pain, and dysfunction. There is no clear time frame for these changes— indeed, symptoms do not correlate well with radiographic anatomy or arthrosis and the predictors of arthrosis are not well established. ## PATIENT HISTORY AND PHYSICAL FINDINGS Pain should be very discrete and specific. It is important that there be a direct correlation of the pain with a clear operative target. Vague, diffuse, or disproportionate pain should not be treated with osteotomy. Pain alone is not a good indication for osteotomy, so the interview should elicit specific aspects of the pain for which there is a good operative target and the risks of surgery are justified. Illustration 2 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion --- Illustration 3 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion ### FIG 2 • A,B. Anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of extraarticular dorsally angulated malunion. C,D. PA and lateral radiographs of an extra-articular dorsally displaced malunion. E. CT shows rotational deformity associated with a volarly displaced extra-articular fracture. (Copyright Diego Fernandez, MD, PhD.) Lack of motion should be clearly due to malalignment and not due to pain or protectiveness—likewise for instability of the DRUJ. Range of motion: A goniometer is used to measure wrist flexion, extension, radial and ulnar deviation, supination, and pronation. Ulnocarpal compression: The carpus is forcefully ulnarly deviated toward the ulna. Consistent reproduction of usual pain with ulnar deviation tasks is consistent with ulnocarpal impaction. The examiner can test for DRUJ instability by stabilizing the radius and trying to subluxate the distal ulna dorsal and volar from the sigmoid notch of the radius. Substantially, less stability than the opposite side may correlate with symptomatic DRUJ instability, but this is a very difficult and subjective test. Scaphoid shift test: Instability compared to the opposite wrist would indicate a possible scapholunate interosseous ligament tear, indicating a potential dissociative rather than the typical nondissociative carpal malalignment usually associated with distal radius malunion. Grip strength is one of the measure of wrist dysfunction, but it is largely determined by pain and effort—both strongly influenced by psychosocial factors. ## IMAGING AND OTHER DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES PA and lateral radiographs of the wrist ( FIG 2A-D) can be supplemented by specific radiographs for evaluation of the joint surface, particularly for potential articular malunions. Comparison with the opposite, uninjured wrist is useful and serves as a template for surgical correction. CT, particularly three-dimensional CT, is useful to precisely evaluate the joint surfaces ( FIG 2E). Neurophysiologic tests (nerve conduction velocity and electromyography) are ordered to evaluate any symptoms or signs of carpal tunnel syndrome that may need to be addressed. 144 ## DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Stiffness: capsular stiffness and tendon adhesions Numbness: idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome Pain: another discrete source of pain or even nonspecific pain ## NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT Nonoperative management is appropriate for low-demand and infirm individuals. Splints are weaned after 6 weeks of cast immobilization. Patients who struggle to regain motion may benefit from working with an occupational therapist or a certified hand therapist. Normal activities are resumed in 3 or 4 months. The patient may return every 2 or 4 months or so until satisfied with the result. Patience is warranted in many situations, particularly for patients with ulnar-sided wrist pain thought to be due to an extra-articular malunion. This discomfort is the last pain to go away after a distal radius fracture and can last up to a year. ## SURGICAL MANAGEMENT Surgery is appropriate when a radiographic deformity correlates with a specific anatomically correctable problem and the deformity is associated with a substantial risk of dysfunction or arthrosis. The patient must understand the risks and benefits of intervening. The surgeon should be wary of pain as the primary complaint because pain is strongly influenced by psychosocial factors, and pain relief is an achievable goal only when consistent with an objective, correctable anatomic deformity such as discomfort clearly associated with a substantial ulnocarpal impingement. When the issue is restriction of motion and there is less than 20 degrees of dorsal tilt or less than 5 mm of ulnar positive variance, a nonoperative approach may be warranted. Illustration 4 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion --- Illustration 5 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion ### FIG 3 • A,B. Preoperative plans for dorsal osteotomy in the patient in TECH FIGS 1, 2, 3: preosteotomy plan ( A) and postosteotomy and corticocancellous bone grafting plan (B). (continued) There are no fixed rules or thresholds for acceptable alignment. The correlation with symptoms and disability is more important. Intra-articular osteotomies should be considered only when the malalignment is simple and the planned correction is straightforward. For instance, osteotomy of a volar shearing fracture would be considered when the fragment is large, there is little or no articular comminution or impaction, and the dorsal fragments are not healed in a malaligned position. Distal radius osteotomy need not be performed urgently. The patient should have demonstrated excellent exercise skills and full finger motion and there should be no significant nerve or tendon dysfunction or edema. In the case of an intra-articular malunion, intervening early (optimally within 10 weeks) when the fracture is not completely healed may take precedence over these concerns. ## Preoperative Planning The desired angular, rotational, and length corrections are planned based on preoperative radiologic studies, including a radiograph of the opposite wrist if uninjured ( FIG 3A,B). It can be useful to draw and write out a reconstruction plan, particularly for complex malunions ( FIG 3C-E). In that way, every contingency is anticipated and the surgery is likely to go more smoothly. ## Positioning The patient is positioned supine with the arm supported on a hand table. A nonsterile pneumatic tourniquet is used and inflated after exsanguination and before the skin incision. ## Approach The operative approach is either dorsal or volar, depending on the deformity and the chosen surgical technique. 145 Illustration 6 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion --- Illustration 7 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion Illustration 8 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion Illustration 9 for Precision Correction for Distal Radius Malunion ### FIG 3 • (continued) C. Preoperative plan for an extra-articular osteotomy through a volar approach in the patient in TECH FIGS 4 and 5. D,E. Preoperative plans for an intra-articular dorsally angulated malunion in the patient in TECH FIG 6. (Copyright Diego Fernandez, MD, PhD.) *

TECHNIQUES

PEARLS AND PITFALLS Preoperative plan 1. A poor or incomplete preoperative plan will increase the amount of uncertainty and hesitation during surgery. This will increase the operative time and the frustration level and will decrease the satisfaction with the surgery. 2. Making a detailed preoperative plan will improve the efficiency and efficacy of the procedure. Extraarticular malunions 1. Manipulating the distal fragment can be much more difficult with poor-quality bone. 2. The use of a distractor or small external fixator greatly facilitates realignment and provisional stabilization of the fragments. 3. Consider using two distractors in perpendicular planes (eg, one dorsal and one direct radial) to help obtain and maintain alignment. 4. Restoration of length in addition to that gained with angular realignment (ie, lengthening of both the dorsal and volar cortices) is much more difficult. 5. The most difficult part of performing an osteotomy for a dorsal angulated malunion from a volar approach is realignment of the bone. 6. An extended FCR exposure allows release of the dorsal periosteum and Z-lengthening of the brachioradialis, both of which facilitate realignment of the radius. Intraarticular malunions 7. Handling small articular fracture fragments can be difficult. 8. Each fragment can be realigned using a Kirschner wire as a joystick. 9. The articular osteotomy is easiest when the original fracture lines can be identified. 10. Try to intervene within 3 months of injury when articular malunion is identified. ## POSTOPERATIVE CARE 151 Active and active-assisted exercise of the fingers and forearm, finger exercises to reduce swelling, and active functional use of the limb for light tasks are encouraged immediately. The initial plaster splint is exchanged for a custom Orthoplast removable splint 2 weeks after the surgery. The patient gradually weans out of the splint between 4 and 6 weeks after surgery and initiates active and active-assisted wrist exercises. Strengthening and forceful use of the arm are restricted until early radiographic union is apparent. Unrestricted use of the limb is allowed when solid union is present clinically and radiographically. ## OUTCOMES Fernandez' 1, 2 articles describing dorsal osteotomy with corticocancellous bone graft with and without Bowers arthroplasty of the DRUJ established the value of the technique for improving function in patients with symptomatic distal radius malunions. He documented good or excellent results in 75% and 80% of patients, respectively, noting that satisfactory results depend on the absence of degenerative changes in the radiocarpal and intercarpal joints, and the presence of adequate preoperative range of motion of the wrist. Corrective osteotomy with carefully preoperatively planned structural corticocancellous bone graft does not reliably achieve the planned correction. 12 Nonunions, loss of alignment, and major complications were not reported in these series. Jupiter and Ring 5 demonstrated that early correction of distal radius deformity shortened the period of disability without increasing complications and that the combination of cancellous autograft and locking plates was as reliable as corticocancellous bone grafting. 9 Nonunions, loss of alignment, and major complications were not reported in these series. Several small articles have established the safety and efficacy of volar osteotomy for a dorsally displaced fracture. 4, 6 Shea et al 10 established the safety and efficacy of osteotomy for volar extra-articular malunions in a case series. Fernandez et al 3 established the safety and efficacy of osteotomy for a radially deviated extra-articular malunion in a case series. Several case series have documented the safety and efficacy of intra-articular osteotomy. 7, 8, 11 ## COMPLICATIONS Nonunion Loss of alignment Loss of fixation Infection Wound problems Nerve injury ##

Scientific References

  1. 1. Fernandez DL. Correction of post-traumatic wrist deformity in adults by osteotomy, bone grafting, and internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64(8):1164-1178. 2. Fernandez DL. Radial osteotomy and Bowers arthroplasty for malunited fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg 1988;70(10):1538-1551. 3. Fernandez DL, Capo JT, Gonzalez E. Corrective osteotomy for symptomatic increased ulnar tilt of the distal end of the radius. J Hand Surg Am 2001;26(4):722-732. 4. Henry M. Immediate mobilisation following corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunions with cancellous graft and volar fixed angle plates. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2007;32:88-92. 5. Jupiter JB, Ring D. A comparison of early and late reconstruction of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint **Surg 1996;78(5):739-748.** 6. Malone KJ, Magnell TD, Freeman DC, et al. Surgical correction of dorsally angulated distal radius malunions with fixed angle volar plating: a case series. J Hand Surg Am 2006;31(3):366-372. 7. Marx RG, Axelrod TS. Intraarticular osteotomy of distal radial malunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (327):152-157. 8. Ring D, Prommersberger KJ, Gonzalez del Pino J, et al. Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion of the distal part of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87(7):1503-1509. 9. Ring D, Roberge C, Morgan T, et al. Osteotomy for malunited fractures of the distal radius: a comparison of structural and structural autogenous bone grafts. J Hand Surg Am 2002;27(2):216-222. 10. Shea K, Fernandez DL, Jupiter JB, et al. Corrective osteotomy for malunited, volarly displaced fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79(12):1816-1826. 11. Thivaios GC, McKee MD. Sliding osteotomy for deformity correction following malunion of volarly displaced distal radial fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17:326-333. [View Source / PubMed]
  2. 12. von Campe A, Nagy L, Arbab D, et al. Corrective osteotomies in malunions of the distal radius: do we get what we planned? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;450:179-185. [View Source / PubMed]

You Might Also Like

Dr. Mohammed Hutaif
Medically Verified Content by
Prof. Dr. Mohammed Hutaif
Consultant Orthopedic & Spine Surgeon
Chapter Index

Back to Master Guide