Fractures, Dislocations, and Fracture-Dislocations of the Spine: A Comprehensive Surgical Guide
Key Takeaway
Spinal fractures and dislocations represent devastating injuries requiring meticulous clinical evaluation, advanced neuroimaging, and precise surgical intervention. This comprehensive guide details the epidemiology, biomechanical classifications, and operative management of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine trauma. Emphasizing evidence-based protocols, it provides orthopedic surgeons with critical insights into decompression techniques, rigid internal fixation, and postoperative rehabilitation to optimize neurological recovery and spinal stability.
Introduction and Epidemiology of Spinal Trauma
Fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine represent some of the most devastating injuries encountered in orthopedic trauma, predominantly affecting the young, active population. The management of these injuries requires a profound understanding of spinal biomechanics, neuroanatomy, and advanced surgical techniques.
Epidemiological data indicates that approximately 50 individuals per 1 million sustain a spinal cord injury (SCI) annually. In the United States alone, this translates to roughly 14,000 new SCI cases each year, leaving 8,000 to 10,000 patients paralyzed. Currently, an estimated 250,000 to 400,000 individuals live with spinal cord dysfunction. The mortality associated with these injuries is stark; of those who succumb within the first year, 90% die en route to the hospital. However, the advent of regional Level I trauma centers and advanced pre-hospital care has drastically improved survival rates. Today, 85% of SCI patients who survive the first 24 hours remain alive 10 years post-injury.
Historically, renal failure was the leading cause of death in SCI patients due to neurogenic bladder complications. Modern urologic management has shifted this paradigm, making respiratory failure the primary cause of mortality. The socioeconomic burden is immense, with estimated healthcare and lost productivity costs exceeding $4 billion annually.
Initial Evaluation and Emergency Management
The initial management of a patient with a suspected spinal fracture must strictly adhere to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. Nearly 43% of patients with spinal cord injuries present with polytrauma, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach.
Neurological Evaluation
A meticulous neurological examination is paramount and must be documented using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale. This standardized assessment evaluates motor function across 10 key myotomes and sensory function (pinprick and light touch) across 28 dermatomes.
Clinical Pearl: The presence of sacral sparing (perianal sensation, voluntary anal sphincter contraction, or great toe flexor activity) differentiates an incomplete spinal cord injury from a complete injury. This distinction is critical, as incomplete injuries have a significantly higher potential for neurological recovery following surgical decompression.
Spinal Cord Syndromes
Understanding specific incomplete spinal cord syndromes aids in localizing the injury and predicting prognosis:
* Central Cord Syndrome: Typically occurs in older patients with pre-existing cervical spondylosis who sustain a hyperextension injury. Characterized by disproportionately greater motor impairment in the upper extremities compared to the lower extremities.
* Brown-Séquard Syndrome: Results from hemisection of the cord (e.g., penetrating trauma). Presents with ipsilateral loss of motor function and proprioception, and contralateral loss of pain and temperature sensation.
* Anterior Cord Syndrome: Caused by injury to the anterior spinal artery or direct anterior compression. Results in variable loss of motor function and pain/temperature sensation, with preserved dorsal column function (proprioception and deep pressure).
Imaging Evaluation
- Computed Tomography (CT): The gold standard for evaluating bony architecture. Thin-slice (1 mm) helical CT with sagittal and coronal reconstructions is mandatory for all suspected spinal fractures.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Essential for evaluating the spinal cord, intervertebral discs, and the posterior ligamentous complex (PLC). Short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences are highly sensitive for detecting ligamentous edema and occult soft-tissue injuries.
Cervical Spine Injuries
Cervical spine injuries are broadly divided into upper (Occiput to C2) and lower (C3 to C7) cervical injuries, each possessing unique biomechanical characteristics and surgical indications.
Injuries to the Upper Cervical Spine (Occiput to C2)
Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation (AOD)
AOD is a highly lethal injury resulting from extreme flexion or extension combined with distraction. Survival has increased due to better pre-hospital immobilization. Diagnosis relies on the Harris lines (basion-dental interval and basion-axial interval).
* Treatment: AOD is highly unstable. Nonoperative management is contraindicated. Patients require rigid Occipito-Cervical (O-C) fusion.
Atlas (C1) Fractures
Commonly known as Jefferson fractures, these result from axial loading. The critical determinant of stability is the integrity of the transverse atlantal ligament (TAL).
* Evaluation: The "Rule of Spence" on an open-mouth odontoid radiograph or coronal CT dictates that if the combined lateral overhang of the C1 lateral masses on C2 exceeds 6.9 mm, the TAL is presumed ruptured.
* Treatment: Intact TAL injuries are managed with a rigid cervical collar. Ruptured TAL injuries require C1-C2 posterior instrumentation and fusion.
Dens (Odontoid) Fractures
Classified by Anderson and D'Alonzo:
* Type I: Avulsion of the tip (stable, collar).
* Type II: Fracture through the base of the neck. High rate of nonunion due to watershed blood supply.
* Type III: Fracture extending into the C2 body (highly vascularized, usually heals with rigid immobilization).
Surgical Pitfall: Type II dens fractures in patients over 65 years old have a nonunion rate exceeding 50% with halo vest immobilization. Early surgical intervention (Anterior Odontoid Screw or Posterior C1-C2 Fusion) is strongly recommended to reduce morbidity and mortality in the elderly.
Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis (Hangman's Fracture)
Resulting from hyperextension and axial loading, this involves bilateral fractures of the C2 pars interarticularis. Most (Levine-Edwards Type I and II) are managed nonoperatively with a rigid collar or Halo vest. Type IIA (flexion-distraction) and Type III (associated with bilateral C2-C3 facet dislocation) require operative reduction and stabilization.
Injuries to the Lower Cervical Spine (C3-C7)
The Allen and Ferguson classification categorizes lower cervical injuries based on the mechanism of injury: Compressive Flexion, Vertical Compression, Distractive Flexion, Compressive Extension, Distractive Extension, and Lateral Flexion.
Unilateral and Bilateral Facet Dislocations
These represent distractive flexion injuries. Bilateral facet dislocations are highly unstable and frequently associated with complete spinal cord injuries.
* Preoperative MRI: Mandatory in awake, non-evaluable, or neurologically deteriorating patients to rule out a herniated nucleus pulposus behind the vertebral body.
* Surgical Approach: If a disc herniation is present, an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) must be performed first to remove the compressive disc before reducing the facets, preventing iatrogenic spinal cord transection. If no disc is present, closed reduction via cranial traction or open posterior reduction and fusion can be performed.
Thoracic and Lumbosacral Fractures
The thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) is the most common site for spinal fractures due to the biomechanical transition from the rigid, kyphotic thoracic spine to the mobile, lordotic lumbar spine.
Classification Systems
Modern surgical decision-making relies heavily on the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) and the AOSpine classification. TLICS evaluates three parameters:
1. Morphology: Compression (1), Burst (2), Translation/Rotation (3), Distraction (4).
2. Neurological Status: Intact (0), Root injury (2), Complete cord/conus (2), Incomplete cord/conus (3), Cauda equina (3).
3. Posterior Ligamentous Complex (PLC): Intact (0), Suspected/Indeterminate (2), Injured (3).
A TLICS score of $\le$ 3 suggests nonoperative management, 4 is indeterminate, and $\ge$ 5 mandates operative intervention.
Vertebral Compression and Burst Fractures
- Compression Fractures: Involve failure of the anterior column only. Usually stable and managed with a Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis (TLSO). In osteoporotic patients with refractory pain, Balloon Kyphoplasty or Vertebroplasty may be indicated.
- Burst Fractures: Involve failure of the anterior and middle columns (Denis classification) with retropulsion of bone into the spinal canal.
Surgical Warning: The degree of canal stenosis in a burst fracture does not perfectly correlate with neurological deficit. Prophylactic decompression in a neurologically intact patient with severe canal stenosis is controversial; however, the canal will remodel over time. Surgery is strictly indicated for progressive neurological deficit, severe kyphosis (>30 degrees), or loss of vertebral height (>50%).
Operative Techniques and Instrumentation
Posterior Pedicle Screw Instrumentation
Pedicle screw fixation is the workhorse of thoracolumbar trauma surgery, providing rigid three-column stabilization.
* Positioning: The patient is placed prone on a radiolucent Jackson spinal table. Care must be taken to pad all bony prominences and ensure the abdomen hangs free to decrease epidural venous pressure.
* Entry Point: In the lumbar spine, the entry point is the intersection of the pars interarticularis, the base of the superior articular process, and the transverse process.
* Technique: The cortex is burred, and a pedicle probe is advanced under fluoroscopic guidance. The trajectory must converge medially (10-15 degrees in the lumbar spine) and parallel the superior endplate. Following tapping, the appropriate diameter and length screws are inserted.
* Reduction: Rods are contoured to restore physiological lordosis or kyphosis. Distraction or compression maneuvers are applied to restore vertebral height and correct deformity.
Anterior Decompression and Internal Fixation
Indicated for severe burst fractures with significant anterior cord compression and neurological deficit.
* Approach: A left-sided thoracotomy or thoracoabdominal approach is typically utilized.
* Technique: A corpectomy (removal of the fractured vertebral body and adjacent discs) is performed to decompress the thecal sac. An expandable titanium cage or structural allograft is inserted to reconstruct the anterior column, followed by the application of an anterolateral plate or dual-rod system.
Sacral Fractures and Spinopelvic Dissociation
Sacral fractures are high-energy injuries often associated with pelvic ring disruptions. The Denis classification divides them into Zone I (alar), Zone II (foraminal), and Zone III (central canal).
* Spinopelvic Dissociation: A U-shaped or H-shaped Zone III fracture disconnects the spine from the pelvis. This is a highly unstable injury requiring lumbopelvic fixation (pedicle screws in L4/L5 connected to iliac or S2-alar-iliac screws) to allow early mobilization and prevent progressive kyphotic deformity.
Postoperative Protocols and Rehabilitation
The ultimate goal of spinal trauma surgery is to achieve a stable, well-aligned spine that allows for early mobilization, thereby mitigating the complications of prolonged bed rest (e.g., deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, decubitus ulcers, and pneumonia).
- Hemodynamic Management: For acute cervical and upper thoracic SCI, maintaining a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) > 85 mmHg for 7 days post-injury is critical to optimize spinal cord perfusion and minimize secondary ischemic injury.
- Thromboprophylaxis: Mechanical prophylaxis (SCDs) should be initiated immediately. Chemical prophylaxis (e.g., Low Molecular Weight Heparin) should commence 24 to 48 hours postoperatively, provided there is no evidence of expanding epidural hematoma.
- Rehabilitation: Early integration of physical and occupational therapy is essential. Patients with complete injuries require extensive training in transfers, wheelchair mobility, and activities of daily living, while those with incomplete injuries undergo intensive gait training and motor retraining.
In conclusion, the operative management of spinal fractures and dislocations demands a rigorous, evidence-based approach. By integrating precise anatomical knowledge with advanced biomechanical instrumentation, the orthopedic surgeon can successfully navigate these complex injuries, maximizing the patient's potential for neurological recovery and long-term functional independence.
📚 Medical References
- spinal fractures, Spine 13:641, 1988.
- Gold DT: The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis, Bone 18(suppl 3):185, 1996.
- Grabb PA, Pang D: Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality in children, Neurosurgery 35:406, 1994.
- Green BA, Callahan RA, Klore KJ, et al: Acute spinal cord injury: current concepts, Clin Orthop Relat Res 154:125, 1981.
- Heller JG, Silcox DH, Sutterlin CE: Complications of posterior cervical plating, Spine 20:2442, 1995.
- Hildingsson C, Hietala SO, Toolanen G, et al: Negative scintigraphy despite spinal fractures in the multiply injured, Injury 24:467, 1993.
- Holdsworth FW: Traumatic paraplegia. In Platt H, ed: Modern trends in orthopaedics (second series), New York, 1956, Paul B Hoeber. Holdsworth FW: Fractures, dislocations, and fracturedislocations of the spine, J Bone Joint Surg 45B:6, 1963.
- Holdsworth FW: Fractures, dislocations, and fracturedislocations of the spine, J Bone Joint Surg 52A:1534, 1970.
- Holdsworth SF: Review article: fractures, dislocations, and fracture-dislocations of the spine, J Bone Joint Surg 52B:1534, 1970.
- Hopkins TJ, White AA: Rehabilitation of athletes following spine injury, Clin Sports Med 12:603, 1993.
- Huang TJ, Hsu RWW, Fan GF, et al: Two-level burst fractures: clinical evaluation and treatment options, J Trauma 41:77, 1996.
- Hurlbert RJ: The role of steroids in acute spinal cord injury: an evidence-based analysis, Spine 26(24 suppl):S39, 2001.
- Jelsma RK, Rice JF, Jelsma LF, et al: The demonstration and signifi cance of neural compression after spinal injury, Surg Neurol 18:79, 1982.
- Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L, et al: Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study: study of osteoporotic fractures research group, Arch Intern Med 159:1215, 1999.
- Kahnovitz N, Bullough P, Jacobs RR: The effect of internal fi xation without arthrodesis on human facet joint cartilage, Clin Orthop Relat Res 189:204, 1984.
- Karasick D, Huettl EA, Cotler JM: Value of polydirectional tomography in the assessment of the postoperative spine after anterior decompression and vertebral body autografting, Skeletal Radiol 21:359, 1992.
- Kirkpatrick JS, Wilber RG, Likavec M, et al: Anterior stabilization of thoracolumbar burst fractures using the Kaneda device: a preliminary report, Orthopedics 18:673, 1995.
- Kraus JF, Franti CE, Riggins RS, et al: Incidence of traumatic spinal cord lesions, J Chronic Dis 28:471, 1975.
- Kreitz BG, Cote P, Cassidy JD: L5 vertebral compression fracture: a series of fi ve cases, J Manipulative Physiol Ther 18:91, 1995.
- Laborde JM, Bahniuk E, Bohlman HH, et al: Comparison of fi xation of spinal fractures, Clin Orthop Relat Res 152:303, 1980.
- Leroux JL, Denat B, Thomas E, et al: Sacral insuffi ciency fractures presenting as acute low-back pain: biomechanical aspects, Spine 18:2502, 1993.
- Levine AM, McAfee PC, Anderson PA: Evaluation and emergent treatment of patients with thoracolumbar trauma, Instr Course Lect 44:33, 1995.
- Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, et al: Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status, Am J Med 94:595, 1993.
- Mann DC, Dodds JA: Spinal injuries in 57 patients 17 years or younger, Orthopedics 16:159, 1993.
- Markel DC, Graziano G: A comparison study of treatment of thoracolumbar fractures using the ACE Posterior Segmental Fixator and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation, Orthopedics 18:679, 1995.
- Markel DC, Raskas DS, Graziano GP: A case of traumatic spinopelvic dissociation, J Orthop Trauma 7:562, 1993.
- Matsumoto T, Tamaki T, Kawakami M, et al: Early complications of high-dose methylprednisolone sodium succinate treatment in the follow-up of acute cervical spinal cord injury, Spine 26:426, 2001.
- McCutcheon EP, Selassie AW, Gu JK, Pickelsimer EE: Acute traumatic spinal cord injury, 1993-2000: a population-based assessment of methylprednisolone administration and hospitalization, J Trauma 56:1076, 2004.
- McDonnell MF, Glassman SD, Dimar JR, et al: Perioperative complications of anterior procedures on the spine, J Bone Joint Surg 78A:839, 1996.
- McLain RF, Benson DR: Urgent surgical stabilization of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients, Spine 24:1646, 1999.
- McPhee IB: Spinal fractures and dislocations in children and adolescents, Spine 6:533, 1981.
- Merola A, O’Brien MF, Castro BA, et al: Histologic characterization of acute spinal cord injury treated with intravenous methylprednisolone, J Orthop Trauma 16:155, 2002.
- Meyer PR Jr: Emergency room assessment: management of spinal cord and associated injuries. In Meyer PR Jr, ed: Surgery of spine trauma, New York, 1989, Churchill Livingstone. Modic MT, Masaryk T, Paushter D: Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine, Radiol Clin North Am 24:229, 1986.
- Montgomery TJ, McGuire RA Jr: Traumatic
You Might Also Like