Menu

Question 21

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

Scapular notching is a recognized complication of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Which technical modification of the glenosphere most effectively reduces the incidence of this complication?

. Superior placement with superior tilt
. Superior placement with inferior tilt
. Inferior placement with superior tilt
. Inferior placement with inferior tilt
. Neutral placement with neutral tilt

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Inferior placement with inferior tilt


Explanation

Scapular notching occurs when the humeral component impinges on the inferior scapular neck. Inferior placement of the glenosphere (with or without an inferior tilt) overhangs the bone edge and helps prevent impingement and subsequent notching.

Question 22

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), moving the center of rotation medially and distally compared to the native joint achieves which of the following biomechanical advantages?

. Increases the moment arm of the rotator cuff
. Decreases the moment arm of the deltoid
. Increases the tension and moment arm of the deltoid
. Decreases shear forces on the glenoid baseplate
. Restores the anatomic joint line

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increases the tension and moment arm of the deltoid


Explanation

The Grammont principles of RSA involve medializing and distalizing the center of rotation. This increases the tension and moment arm of the deltoid muscle, allowing it to compensate for the deficient rotator cuff.

Question 23

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 70-year-old female is 2 years status-post reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy. Radiographs reveal erosive changes on the inferior scapular neck extending beyond the inferior screw of the baseplate, but not reaching the central peg. According to the Sirveaux classification, what grade of scapular notching is present?

. Grade 1
. Grade 2
. Grade 3
. Grade 4
. Grade 5

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Grade 4


Explanation

In the Sirveaux classification for scapular notching: Grade 1 is confined to the pillar, Grade 2 contacts the inferior screw, Grade 3 extends beyond the inferior screw, and Grade 4 extends to the central peg of the baseplate.

Question 24

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 72-year-old female undergoes a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. Compared to the native anatomic shoulder, which of the following best describes the biomechanical alteration achieved by the classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder implant?

. Lateralizes the center of rotation and distalizes the humerus.
. Medializes the center of rotation and distalizes the humerus.
. Medializes the center of rotation and proximalizes the humerus.
. Lateralizes the center of rotation and proximalizes the humerus.
. Maintains the anatomic center of rotation while increasing deltoid tension.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Medializes the center of rotation and distalizes the humerus.


Explanation

The Grammont design of an rTSA medializes the center of rotation, which increases the deltoid's moment arm and recruits more muscle fibers for elevation. It also distalizes the humerus, tensioning the deltoid and allowing it to effectively function without a rotator cuff.

Question 25

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 75-year-old male is evaluated 3 years after a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. He is asymptomatic, but a standard AP radiograph shows bone resorption at the inferior scapular neck that extends medially, progressing just past the inferior screw of the glenoid baseplate. According to the Sirveaux classification, what grade of scapular notching does this represent?

. Grade 1
. Grade 2
. Grade 3
. Grade 4
. Grade 5

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Grade 2


Explanation

Scapular notching is a well-known complication of rTSA graded by Sirveaux. Grade 1 involves the scapular pillar only; Grade 2 extends to the inferior screw; Grade 3 extends past the inferior screw; and Grade 4 extends to the central peg of the baseplate.

Question 26

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 75-year-old female with osteoporosis presents with a severely displaced 4-part proximal humerus fracture. The decision is made to proceed with a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) rather than a hemiarthroplasty. Which of the following is the primary biomechanical advantage of RTSA over hemiarthroplasty in this specific clinical scenario?

. Decreased risk of scapular notching
. Lower long-term revision rate for polyethylene wear
. Better preservation of external rotation
. Less dependence on tuberosity healing for forward elevation
. Lower risk of postoperative dislocation

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Less dependence on tuberosity healing for forward elevation


Explanation

RTSA provides a semi-constrained articulation that relies on the deltoid for elevation, shifting the center of rotation medially and inferiorly. This makes forward elevation less dependent on anatomic tuberosity healing, which is often compromised in elderly osteoporotic patients with 4-part fractures.

Question 27

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

In an active 78-year-old female with a highly comminuted 4-part proximal humerus fracture and poor bone quality, what is the primary advantage of a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) compared to a hemiarthroplasty?

. Higher rate of tuberosity healing
. Decreased risk of postoperative dislocation
. More predictable restoration of active forward elevation
. Preservation of native glenoid bone stock
. Shorter operative time

Correct Answer & Explanation

. More predictable restoration of active forward elevation


Explanation

RTSA provides more predictable restoration of active forward elevation and functional outcomes in the elderly with 4-part proximal humerus fractures, as its function does not rely on anatomical tuberosity healing.

Question 28

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 78-year-old female sustains a 4-part proximal humerus fracture with severe tuberosity comminution. Which of the following is the primary biomechanical advantage of choosing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) over a hemiarthroplasty in this patient?

. It relies heavily on tuberosity healing to restore active elevation.
. It lateralizes the center of rotation to increase the subscapularis moment arm.
. It requires an intact rotator cuff for joint stability.
. It medializes and distalizes the center of rotation to recruit the deltoid.
. It preserves the native glenoid bone stock completely.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. It medializes and distalizes the center of rotation to recruit the deltoid.


Explanation

RTSA is preferred for elderly patients with 4-part fractures because it does not rely on tuberosity healing for forward elevation. The design medializes and distalizes the center of rotation, significantly increasing the deltoid moment arm to compensate for a deficient rotator cuff.

Question 29

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 65-year-old male is scheduled for an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Preoperative CT scanning classifies the glenoid morphology as a Walch B2 type. Which of the following best describes a Walch B2 glenoid?

. Concentric wear with central erosion
. Biconcave joint surface with posterior bone wear and retroversion
. Dysplastic retroverted glenoid without focal wear
. Severe anterior glenoid wear with subluxation
. A monoconcave retroverted glenoid with excessive medial wear

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Biconcave joint surface with posterior bone wear and retroversion


Explanation

The Walch B2 classification describes a biconcave glenoid with significant asymmetric posterior wear and retroversion. It is highly associated with posterior humeral head subluxation and poses a significant risk for early glenoid component loosening if not corrected.

Question 30

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

By what primary biomechanical mechanism does a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) restore active forward elevation in patients with rotator cuff tear arthropathy?

. Lateralization and superior translation of the center of rotation
. Medialization and inferior translation of the center of rotation
. Medialization and superior translation of the center of rotation
. Lateralization and inferior translation of the center of rotation
. Anterior translation of the center of rotation

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Medialization and inferior translation of the center of rotation


Explanation

RTSA shifts the center of rotation medially and inferiorly. This increases the deltoid lever arm and recruits more anterior and posterior deltoid fibers, allowing the deltoid to effectively compensate for the deficient rotator cuff.

Question 31

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

When performing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), optimal positioning of the glenoid baseplate is critical to prevent scapular notching. Which of the following baseplate configurations is most effective in minimizing this complication?

. Superior tilt and neutral version
. Inferior tilt and neutral version
. Neutral tilt and 15 degrees of anteversion
. Superior tilt and 10 degrees of retroversion
. Neutral tilt and 20 degrees of retroversion

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Inferior tilt and neutral version


Explanation

Placing the glenoid baseplate with an inferior tilt and neutral version minimizes inferior scapular notching in RTSA. It reduces the mechanical impingement of the humeral component against the scapular neck during adduction.

Question 32

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 78-year-old active female presents with a complex, comminuted four-part proximal humerus fracture with significant displacement and severe osteopenia. She has a pre-existing rotator cuff tear that was symptomatic prior to her fall. She is physiologically fit for surgery and desires the best possible functional outcome. Considering the patient's age, fracture pattern, bone quality, and pre-existing rotator cuff pathology, which surgical option is most likely to provide predictable pain relief and functional improvement?

. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a locking plate and suture augmentation.
. Hemiarthroplasty with tuberosity repair.
. Non-operative management with sling immobilization.
. Intramedullary nailing.
. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA).


Explanation

Correct Answer: EThe case content, particularly the 'Summary of Key Literature / Guidelines' section, strongly supports RTSA in this scenario: 'Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) has gained significant traction, especially in elderly patients with complex PHFs, pre-existing rotator cuff dysfunction, or severe osteopenia. Multiple studies demonstrate more predictable pain relief and functional outcomes with RTSA compared to hemiarthroplasty or ORIF in this specific demographic, as it bypasses the need for tuberosity healing and relies on the deltoid for elevation.' This patient fits all these criteria: elderly, complex four-part fracture, severe osteopenia, and pre-existing rotator cuff tear.Option A (ORIF with a locking plate and suture augmentation):While LPO is the gold standard for many complex PHFs, severe osteopenia and a pre-existing rotator cuff tear significantly increase the risk of fixation failure (screw cutout, nonunion of tuberosities) and poor functional outcomes, as the rotator cuff is essential for ORIF success.Option B (Hemiarthroplasty with tuberosity repair):Hemiarthroplasty has historically been an option for complex four-part fractures in older patients. However, outcomes can be variable and are often limited by tuberosity healing and rotator cuff function. Given the pre-existing rotator cuff tear, tuberosity healing and function would be severely compromised, making RTSA a superior choice.Option C (Non-operative management with sling immobilization):For a complex, comminuted four-part fracture with significant displacement in an active patient, non-operative management would likely lead to severe malunion, pain, and very poor function.Option D (Intramedullary nailing):Intramedullary nailing is less common for complex PHFs and is typically used for select two-part surgical neck fractures. It would be inadequate for a comminuted four-part fracture, especially with tuberosity involvement and osteopenia.

Question 33

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

An 82-year-old female sustains a displaced 4-part proximal humerus fracture. She lives independently and is medically optimized for surgery. When comparing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) for this patient, which of the following is the most significant advantage of RTSA?

. Decreased surgical time and blood loss
. Lower incidence of post-operative scapular notching
. More predictable functional outcomes regardless of tuberosity healing
. Higher rate of anatomic tuberosity union
. Reduced risk of axillary nerve injury

Correct Answer & Explanation

. More predictable functional outcomes regardless of tuberosity healing


Explanation

RTSA provides more reliable functional outcomes in elderly patients with 4-part proximal humerus fractures compared to hemiarthroplasty. Unlike hemiarthroplasty, the success of RTSA is not strictly dependent on the anatomic healing of the tuberosities.

Question 34

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 75-year-old female undergoes reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for an unreconstructible 4-part proximal humerus fracture. Regarding the management of the tuberosities in this setting, which of the following statements is true?

. Tuberosity excision is preferred to reduce the risk of postoperative impingement.
. Healing of the greater tuberosity does not affect external rotation strength in rTSA.
. Anatomic tuberosity repair and healing improves shoulder stability and functional rotation.
. The tuberosities should be routinely excised as the deltoid alone controls all rotational stability.
. Tuberosity malunion leads to superior functional outcomes compared to anatomic union.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Anatomic tuberosity repair and healing improves shoulder stability and functional rotation.


Explanation

In rTSA for fracture, successful healing of the tuberosities correlates with significantly improved active external rotation and overall joint stability. Failure of tuberosity healing can lead to poor external rotation strength and an increased risk of prosthesis dislocation.

Question 35

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

Which of the following is considered an absolute indication for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (RTSA) over Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) in the management of an acute proximal humerus fracture?

. A 3-part fracture in a 45-year-old male
. A fracture-dislocation with associated axillary artery transection
. A 4-part fracture in an 80-year-old with a pre-existing massive irreparable rotator cuff tear
. A surgical neck fracture with 15 degrees of valgus impaction
. An isolated greater tuberosity fracture displaced by 1 cm

Correct Answer & Explanation

. A 4-part fracture in an 80-year-old with a pre-existing massive irreparable rotator cuff tear


Explanation

RTSA relies on a functional deltoid rather than an intact rotator cuff to power shoulder elevation. In an elderly patient with a proximal humerus fracture and a pre-existing massive rotator cuff tear (cuff tear arthropathy), ORIF or hemiarthroplasty will fail, making RTSA the absolute treatment of choice.

Question 36

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 75-year-old female with severe osteoporosis sustains a comminuted 4-part proximal humerus fracture with widely displaced tuberosities. Which surgical option is associated with the most predictable restoration of forward elevation and the lowest rate of functional failure in this specific demographic?

. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with a locking plate
. Hemiarthroplasty
. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA)
. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning
. Non-operative management with early pendulums

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA)


Explanation

In elderly patients with 4-part proximal humerus fractures and poor bone quality, RTSA provides more predictable forward elevation and better functional outcomes compared to hemiarthroplasty or ORIF. This is largely because RTSA relies on the deltoid rather than anatomic tuberosity healing, which is often unreliable in this cohort.

Question 37

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 75-year-old female with osteoporosis sustains a severe 4-part proximal humerus fracture. A reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is chosen over a hemiarthroplasty. What is the primary functional advantage of RTSA in this specific clinical scenario?

. Decreased risk of postoperative dislocation
. Lower risk of periprosthetic joint infection
. Less reliance on tuberosity healing for overhead forward elevation
. Preservation of the native glenoid bone stock
. Ability to repair the rotator cuff primary without tension

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Less reliance on tuberosity healing for overhead forward elevation


Explanation

RTSA provides a stable, fixed fulcrum for the deltoid muscle, allowing active forward elevation even if the tuberosities (and attached rotator cuff) fail to heal or resorb. This overcomes a major cause of poor outcomes seen in hemiarthroplasty for 4-part fractures.

Question 38

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 78-year-old female with osteoporosis presents with a highly comminuted, 4-part proximal humerus fracture. There is significant disruption of the medial hinge and tuberosity osteopenia. Which surgical intervention offers the most reliable functional outcome for this patient?

. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning
. Open reduction and internal fixation with a locking plate
. Hemiarthroplasty
. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA)
. Nonoperative management with a sling

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA)


Explanation

In elderly patients with complex 4-part fractures and poor bone quality, rTSA provides more reliable pain relief and functional restoration compared to ORIF or hemiarthroplasty. It relies on the deltoid for motion, bypassing the frequently compromised rotator cuff and tuberosity healing issues.

Question 39

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis

A 72-year-old female with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tear and pseudoparalysis is undergoing a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). During component positioning, which of the following modifications is most effective at decreasing the risk of postoperative scapular notching?

. Superior tilt of the glenoid baseplate
. Inferior tilt and inferior placement of the glenosphere
. Medialization of the center of rotation
. Decreasing the size of the glenosphere
. Superior translation of the humerus

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Inferior tilt and inferior placement of the glenosphere


Explanation

Scapular notching is a common complication of RTSA caused by impingement of the humeral component against the inferior scapular neck. Inferior positioning and inferior tilt of the baseplate, along with lateralization, significantly reduce this risk.

Question 40

Topic: Shoulder Arthroplasty & Arthritis
A 79-year-old woman with a massive rotator cuff tear presents to the emergency department with pain and difficulty moving her arm 7 weeks after undergoing reverse TSA for a displaced 4-part proximal humerus fracture.
. Avascular necrosis, head collapse, and screw penetration
. Fixation failure and varus collapse
. Humeral stem loosening
. Glenoid component loosening
. Hardware failure (breakage of plate or screws)
. Shoulder dislocation

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Avascular necrosis, head collapse, and screw penetration


Explanation

DISCUSSION: The complication rate is high after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures, particularly in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone. In patients treated with ORIF, common complications include varus malunion (16%), avascular necrosis (10%), screw penetration (8%), and infection (4%). In cases involving a dislocation of the humeral head, avascular necrosis is more common. In patients treated with hemiarthroplasty or TSA, complications include component loosening, infection, and dislocation. TSA is associated with glenoid loosening in patients with rotator cuff incompetence and should be avoided in these patients. Reverse TSA is a potential solution for this population. Dislocation and postoperative infection are potential complications after reverse TSA. RECOMMENDED READINGS: Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, Kammerlander C, Hengg C, Kralinger FS. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2011 Nov;42(11):1283.