This practice set contains high-yield board review questions covering key concepts in Elbow & Forearm. Each clinical scenario is designed to test your diagnostic and management skills relevant to this subspecialty.
Question 121
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 7-year-old boy presents with a missed Bado Type I Monteggia fracture-dislocation that occurred 6 months ago. The radial head remains anteriorly dislocated, and the ulnar fracture is malunited. What is the most appropriate and successful surgical management at this stage?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Ulnar lengthening/angulation osteotomy with open reduction of the radial head
Explanation
The treatment of a chronic, missed pediatric Monteggia fracture requires an ulnar osteotomy to correct the angulation and restore length. This addresses the primary bone deformity, allowing for reduction of the radial head, often supplemented by annular ligament reconstruction.
Question 122
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
When performing surgical reconstruction for a terrible triad injury of the elbow, what is the generally recommended, step-wise sequence to restore joint stability?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Coronoid fixation, radial head fixation or replacement, lateral collateral ligament repair
Explanation
The standard surgical algorithm for a terrible triad injury follows a 'deep to superficial' or 'inside-out' approach. Reconstruction proceeds by first addressing the coronoid, then fixing or replacing the radial head, and finally repairing the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex.
Question 123
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 58-year-old active construction worker presents with a Mason-Johnston Type III radial head fracture after a fall. Radiographs show severe comminution with four distinct fragments involving approximately 60% of the articular surface. There is no associated elbow dislocation. He desires to return to full work capacity. Which of the following is the most appropriate surgical management to restore function and stability?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Radial head replacement
Explanation
For a highly comminuted (Mason-Johnston Type III or IV) radial head fracture, especially in an active patient who desires a full return to function, radial head replacement is often the preferred surgical option. ORIF would be technically challenging or impossible with four fragments involving 60% of the articular surface, and stable fixation is unlikely. Radial head excision, while an option for low-demand patients, carries a significant risk of proximal radial migration and DRUJ instability, which would be detrimental to an active construction worker. Non-operative management is inappropriate for such a severely comminuted and displaced fracture. Primary elbow arthrodesis is a salvage procedure for end-stage arthritis or instability, not an acute fracture.
Question 124
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
During open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a Mason-Johnston Type II radial head fracture, the surgeon plans to use headless compression screws. To minimize the risk of hardware impingement against the capitellum or ulna during forearm rotation, where is the ideal 'safe zone' for screw placement on the radial head?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. The area that does not articulate with the capitellum or the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna throughout the full arc of forearm rotation
Explanation
Correct Answer: CThe 'safe zone' for hardware placement in the radial head is a critical concept in ORIF to prevent impingement. This zone refers to the portion of the radial head that does not articulate with the capitellum of the humerus or the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna through a full range of forearm pronation and supination. It is typically described as a 110-degree arc on the radial head, often corresponding to the posterolateral quadrant when the forearm is in neutral rotation. Placing hardware outside this zone can lead to pain, crepitus, and a mechanical block to motion, necessitating hardware removal. The other options describe articulating surfaces or specific quadrants that are not universally 'safe' throughout the entire range of motion.
Question 125
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 42-year-old female presents to the emergency department after a high-energy fall, sustaining a posterior elbow dislocation, a comminuted radial head fracture (Mason-Johnston Type IV), and a coronoid process fracture. After successful closed reduction of the elbow, radiographs are obtained, as shown below. What is the most critical ligamentous injury associated with this 'terrible triad' pattern that must be assessed and potentially addressed to ensure elbow stability?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL)
Explanation
Correct Answer: CThe 'terrible triad' of the elbow consists of a posterior elbow dislocation, a radial head fracture, and a coronoid process fracture. This injury pattern is characterized by significant instability. The most consistently injured and critical ligament for posterolateral rotatory stability of the elbow in this context is the lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL). Injury to the LUCL, often avulsed from its humeral origin, allows for posterolateral subluxation or dislocation of the ulna relative to the humerus. While the MCL can also be injured, and the annular ligament is disrupted with the radial head fracture, the LUCL is the key structure whose integrity dictates posterolateral rotatory stability and often requires repair or reconstruction in conjunction with radial head replacement and coronoid fixation.
Question 126
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 72-year-old sedentary patient presents with a Mason-Johnston Type III radial head fracture with severe comminution. She has significant comorbidities and is not a candidate for a lengthy or complex surgical procedure. She desires pain relief and improved elbow motion for basic activities of daily living. What is a reasonable management option to consider, accepting potential trade-offs?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Radial head excision
Explanation
For elderly, sedentary patients with severely comminuted radial head fractures (Type III or IV) who are not candidates for ORIF (due to comminution or bone quality) or do not desire more extensive surgery like radial head replacement (due to comorbidities or complexity), radial head excision can be a reasonable option. While it carries the risk of proximal radial migration and DRUJ issues, in low-demand individuals, it can provide pain relief and improve motion with acceptable functional outcomes. ORIF is often not feasible due to comminution. Replacement is a good option but more involved surgery. Arthrodesis is a salvage procedure. Long arm casting would likely lead to severe stiffness in this age group and is generally avoided for radial head fractures.
Question 127
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 45-year-old male undergoes open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of a Mason-Johnston Type II radial head fracture. Two weeks post-operatively, he complains of persistent elbow pain, stiffness, and crepitus, particularly with forearm rotation, despite diligent physical therapy. Radiographs, shown below, confirm stable fixation with no obvious loosening. What is the most common cause of *early* post-operative stiffness and pain in this scenario?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Hardware prominence and impingement
Explanation
Correct Answer: CEarly post-operative stiffness, pain, and crepitus following radial head fracture fixation are very commonly caused by hardware prominence and impingement. If screws or plates are not properly countersunk or are placed outside the 'safe zone' (the non-articulating portion of the radial head), they can impinge on the capitellum or the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna during elbow flexion-extension or forearm rotation. This mechanical impingement causes pain and restricts range of motion. While infection, nerve injury, and non-union are possible complications, hardware impingement is a leading cause of early stiffness directly related to the fixation itself. Aseptic loosening is typically a later complication.
Question 128
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 32-year-old female presents with a Mason-Johnston Type I radial head fracture after a low-energy fall. Radiographs, as shown below, reveal a non-displaced crack in the radial head with no articular step-off. On examination, she has mild pain but full, pain-free forearm pronation and supination. What is the most appropriate initial management strategy?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Sling immobilization for 1 week followed by early active range of motion
Explanation
Correct Answer: CMason-Johnston Type I radial head fractures are characterized by a non-displaced crack or minimal displacement (less than 2mm) without a mechanical block to forearm rotation. For these injuries, non-operative management is the standard of care. This typically involves a brief period of immobilization (e.g., a few days to 1 week in a sling for comfort) followed by early active range of motion exercises. Prolonged immobilization, such as a long arm cast, should be avoided as it significantly increases the risk of elbow stiffness, a common and debilitating complication. Surgical interventions like ORIF, radial head replacement, or excision are not indicated for Type I fractures.
Question 129
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 45-year-old male sustains a 'terrible triad' injury of the elbow following a fall. According to standard surgical protocols, what is the most appropriate sequence of repair after exposing the joint?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Fix the coronoid, fix or replace the radial head, then repair the LCL complex.
Explanation
The standard surgical sequence for a terrible triad injury involves addressing the structures from deep to superficial: fixing the coronoid, fixing or replacing the radial head, and finally repairing the lateral collateral ligament (LCL). If instability persists after these steps, the MCL or a hinged external fixator may be considered.
Question 130
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 45-year-old male sustains a 'terrible triad' injury of the elbow (dislocation, coronoid fracture, and radial head fracture). During operative management, what is the most widely accepted standard surgical sequence for reconstruction?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Fix the coronoid, fix or replace the radial head, then repair the lateral collateral ligament (LCL).
Explanation
The standard surgical algorithm for a terrible triad injury works from deep to superficial and medial to lateral: fix the coronoid first, address the radial head (fixation or arthroplasty), and finally repair the LCL complex to restore posterolateral stability. The MCL is rarely repaired unless instability persists after addressing the other three components.
Question 131
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 32-year-old female sustains a coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus that involves the capitellum and the majority of the trochlea. According to the Bryan and Morrey classification with McKee modification, what type is this fracture, and what is the optimal surgical approach?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Type IV (McKee) / Extensile lateral or universal posterior approach
Explanation
The McKee modification (Type IV) describes a coronal shear fracture extending medially to involve the capitellum and most of the trochlea. To adequately visualize and fix both the capitellum and trochlear fragments, an extensile lateral approach or a posterior approach with an olecranon osteotomy is required.
Question 132
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 35-year-old male sustains a proximal ulna shaft fracture with an associated anterior dislocation of the radial head. According to the Bado classification, what type of Monteggia fracture is this, and what is the standard operative management?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Bado Type I / ORIF of the ulna with closed reduction of the radial head
Explanation
Bado Type I describes a proximal ulna fracture with anterior dislocation of the radial head, the most common type. In adults, the standard of care is anatomic ORIF of the ulna, which typically results in spontaneous, stable closed reduction of the radial head.
Question 133
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 45-year-old female presents with an elbow injury after a fall. Radiographs and CT show a coronal shear fracture of the capitellum extending into the lateral ridge of the trochlea, with posterior comminution. According to the Dubberley classification, what is the best surgical approach and fixation strategy?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Extensile lateral approach with posterior plating and anterior screws
Explanation
This is a Dubberley Type 3B fracture (involving capitellum and trochlea with posterior comminution). Posterior comminution dictates the need for posterior buttress plating to prevent displacement, typically requiring an extensile lateral or posterior approach.
Question 134
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
In the surgical management of a 'terrible triad' injury of the elbow (elbow dislocation, radial head fracture, coronoid fracture), what is the generally accepted and most biomechanically sound sequence of reconstruction?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Coronoid fixation, radial head fixation/replacement, LCL repair
Explanation
The standard deep-to-superficial approach to the terrible triad involves fixing structures from inside out: first the coronoid, then the radial head (fixation or arthroplasty), and finally repairing the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) complex.
Question 135
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 35-year-old male undergoes a two-incision repair of a complete distal biceps tendon rupture. Six months postoperatively, he complains of a severe limitation in forearm rotation. Radiographs demonstrate a radioulnar synostosis. Which specific intraoperative maneuver during the surgical approach is most strongly associated with this complication?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Subperiosteal dissection and exposure of the proximal ulna during the posterior approach
Explanation
Radioulnar synostosis is a known complication of the two-incision (Boyd) approach for distal biceps repair. It is most commonly caused by subperiosteal elevation of the supinator and stripping of the proximal ulna, which triggers heterotopic ossification bridging the radius and ulna.
Question 136
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 35-year-old male sustains a mid-diaphyseal both bones forearm fracture. During surgical planning, the surgeon considers the role of the interosseous membrane. Which statement best describes its primary biomechanical function in the context of forearm stability?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. It acts as a passive ligamentous stabilizer, transferring axial load from the radius to the ulna.
Explanation
Correct Answer: BThe interosseous membrane (IOM) acts as a crucial passive ligamentous stabilizer (Option B) in the forearm. Its primary biomechanical function is to transfer axial load from the radius to the ulna, particularly during gripping and weight-bearing activities through the wrist. It also provides stability against longitudinal and rotational forces, maintaining the relative positions of the radius and ulna. Disruption of the IOM (e.g., in Essex-Lopresti injuries) leads to severe instability of the forearm and wrist.Incorrect Options:A. It serves as the primary attachment site for the pronator quadratus muscle:While some muscles (e.g., FPL, FDP) originate from the IOM, the pronator quadratus primarily attaches to the distal metaphysis of the radius and ulna. The IOM's primary role is not muscle attachment.C. It provides a vascular conduit for the nutrient arteries of the radius and ulna:The nutrient arteries enter the bone directly and are not primarily housed within the IOM as a conduit. The anterior and posterior interosseous arteries run along the membrane, but the membrane itself is not the primary vascular conduit for the bones.D. It facilitates smooth gliding between the radius and ulna during pronation and supination:The IOM is a fibrous structure that limits motion rather than facilitating smooth gliding. The articular surfaces of the radial head and distal radioulnar joint, along with the capsule, facilitate gliding.E. It prevents distal migration of the radial head:The IOM helps maintain the longitudinal stability of the forearm, which indirectly supports the radial head. However, the annular ligament and the integrity of the proximal radioulnar joint are the primary structures preventing distal migration of the radial head.
Question 137
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
An Essex-Lopresti lesion involves a radial head fracture with concomitant injury to the interosseous membrane and DRUJ. To prevent severe longitudinal radioulnar dissociation, which of the following treatments is strictly contraindicated?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Radial head excision
Explanation
Radial head excision is contraindicated in Essex-Lopresti injuries. Removal of the radial head eliminates the primary proximal restraint to longitudinal migration, leading to catastrophic proximal migration of the radius, positive ulnar variance, and severe wrist pain.
Question 138
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
What defines the primary biomechanical axis of rotation for the forearm during pronation and supination?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. A line from the center of the radial head to the fovea of the distal ulna
Explanation
The functional longitudinal axis of forearm rotation passes obliquely from the center of the radial head proximally to the fovea at the base of the ulnar styloid distally.
Question 139
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 45-year-old female presents with a highly comminuted radial head fracture, wrist pain, and proximal migration of the radius on radiographs. An Essex-Lopresti injury is suspected. Which treatment strategy is strongly contraindicated in this patient?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Radial head excision alone
Explanation
In an Essex-Lopresti injury (interosseous membrane tear with DRUJ disruption), radial head excision removes the proximal block to radius migration. This leads to severe ulnar positive variance and chronic wrist pain.
Question 140
Topic: Elbow & Forearm
A 40-year-old male is evaluated for chronic wrist pain and weakness following a highly displaced radial head fracture treated with excision. Radiographs reveal 5 mm of proximal radial migration. What is the most appropriate reconstructive option to restore longitudinal stability?
Correct Answer & Explanation
. Radial head arthroplasty with ulnar shortening osteotomy
Explanation
In a chronic Essex-Lopresti lesion with established proximal radial migration, radial head arthroplasty alone is insufficient due to soft tissue contracture. A combined procedure, typically radial head arthroplasty with an ulnar shortening osteotomy, is required to level the DRUJ and restore stability.
Test Yourself
Switch to an interactive, timed exam simulation to truly master this topic.