Skip to main content
ULNAR STYLOID FRACTURES

ULNAR STYLOID FRACTURES

446 views
8 min read

ULNAR STYLOID FRACTURES

■            Following anatomic reduction of  the distal radius fracture, insert the arthroscope in the dorsal 3/4 portal and the probe in the 6R portal. Palpate the tension of the articular disc.
■       Good tension indicates that the majority of  the pe-
ripheral TFCC fibers are  intact or still attached to the proximal ulna.
■       A  peripheral tear  of   the  articular disc  is  repaired
arthroscopically when detected.21
■            Stabilization of  a large ulnar styloid fragment is considered when the articular disc  is lax  by  palpation and no peripheral TFCC is identified (TECH FIG 5).
■       In this instance, the majority of the fibers of the TFCC
are  attached to the displaced ulnar styloid fragment.
■            Make a small  incision between  the extensor carpi  ulnaris and the flexor carpi  ulnaris tendons and identify the fracture site.
■            Retrieve the distal fragment, which often displaces in a
distal and radial direction.
■            Mobilize the styloid fragment using a no.  15 blade, taking  care  to protect the TFCC insertion.
■            Reduce the fragment anatomically, under direct visual-
ization, and insert a  guidewire in  a  retrograde manner for  provisional stability.
■            Stabilize the ulnar styloid fragment using either a  ten-
sion   band  technique (with wire   and two K-wires)   or, preferably, using a micro  headless cannulated screw.
■            Place  the cannulated headless screw  over  the guidewire and verify  fracture reduction with fluoroscopy.
■            Insert the arthroscope into the 3/4 portal and the probe
into the  6R  portal to  document restoration of   TFCC
tension.G 5 • In this case,  following reduction to the distal radius  fracture, the articular disc was  palpated and found to be lax but with no  peripheral tear. The  large ulnar styloid fragment was   reduced  with a  micro   Acutrak  screw   (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR).

TECH FIG 5 • In this case,  following reduction to the distal radius  fracture, the articular disc was  palpated and found to be lax but with no  peripheral tear. The  large ulnar styloid fragment was   reduced  with a  micro   Acutrak  screw   (Acumed, Hillsboro, OR).

PEARLS AND PITFALLS

Timing  of reduction                   ■ Arthroscopically assisted reduction of distal radius fractures is most ideal between 3 and 10 days following injury.  Assisted fixation before 3 days  usually is complicated by bleeding that can  obscure visualization. Percutaneous fracture reduction more than 10 days  after the injury  is exceedingly difficult and often unsuccessful. Arthroscopic visualization          ■  It is important to take the time to thoroughly irrigate and débride the joint of hematoma and debris. This especially helps visualization of fragment rotation. Irrigation through a separte  6U inflow portal is helpful. A Coban wrap (3M, St. Paul,  MN) may  be  wrapped around the forearm to limit  fluid  extravasation into the soft  tissues. Instrumentation                         ■  Large-joint instrumentation will damage the articular cartilage and is not appropriate. A mobile traction tower is extremely helpful in arthroscopic-assisted management of distal radius fractures. Fixation                                        ■  Do not substitute poor fixation for  an  arthroscopically assisted procedure. Fixation should be chosen to fit the personality of the fracture. For example, K-wires  should not be  used to stabilize a volar  Barton’s fracture when volar  plate stabilization is the obvious choice. While  K-wires  are  easy to insert, they hinder rehabilitation and have the potential for  pin  track infections. 2181 ■  Cannulated screws  are  recommended when arthroscopically stabilizing a fracture of the distal radius  without metaphyseal comminution. ■  Volar  plate fixation is recommended when metaphyseal comminution is present. ■ Arthroscopic evaluation of the wrist  while the distal screws  are  being placed offers the advantage of seeing the screws  penetrate into the fracture fragments, thereby ensuring stability. Arthroscopic evaluation is helpful in variable-angle volar  locking plates to ensure the screws  do  not violate the joint. Observation                                ■  It is imperative following arthroscopically assisted reduction of the distal radius in the radiocarpal space to evaluate the midcarpal space. The midcarpal space is the most sensitive and ideal location to evaluate intercarpal stability. In addition, loose bodies from the capitate or hamate occasionally are  seen, particularly in association with lunate die  punch fractures. Arthroscopic evaluation also aids  in determining when to fix the ulnar styloid.

POSTOPERATIVE CARE

■    The degree of postoperative immobilization depends on numerous factors,  including the mode of  fracture stabilization, the quality of the bone for internal fixation,  the stability of the fixation,  and the management of any associated soft tissue injuries that were addressed during the arthroscopic evaluation.
■    Immediate range of motion of the digits and wrist is initiated in patients with volar plate fixation with good bone stock and solid fixation.
■    In patients with soft osteopenic bone with volar plate fixation,  digital range of  motion  exercises are initiated immediately, but wrist range of motion is delayed approximately 3 to
4 weeks to permit some fracture healing.
■    Soft bone may collapse around the rigid plate.
■    In  patients without  metaphyseal comminution  treated by arthroscopically assisted stabilization with cannulated screws, range of motion is initiated as the patient tolerates.
■    In patients treated with percutaneous K-wires, the wrist is immobilized until the wires are removed, usually 4 to 6 weeks after surgery.
■    A patient with an unstable DRUJ treated by TFCC repair or ulnar styloid reduction and fixation  is restricted from pronation and supination for 2 to 4 weeks.

OUTCOMES

■    The  literature is relatively sparse regarding the results of arthroscopically  assisted fixation  of  displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures.
■    A comparison study of 12 open and 12 arthroscopic reductions of comminuted AO type VII and VIII fractures of the distal  radius found  that  the arthroscopic group  had  increased range  of   motion   as  compared  to   the  open   stabilization group.23
■    A  second comparison study of 38 patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted fixation compared to open reduction found  the arthroscopically  assisted group  had  better results and improved range of motion.2
■    One  study compared 15 patients with arthroscopically assisted fixation to 15 patients who underwent closed reduction and external fixation.21  In this study, there were 10 tears of the triangular fibrocartilage complex in the group that underwent arthroscopic reduction, of which seven were peripheral and repaired. There were no signs of distal radioulnar joint instability at final follow-up visit. In the 15 patients who underwent stabilization by external fixation alone, four patients had continued complaints of  instability of  the distal radial joint, very possibly the result of undiagnosed and untreated TFCC tears.

COMPLICATIONS

■    Failure of fixation
■    Late settling of the fracture despite fixation
■    Flexor and extensor tendon irritation
■    Painful metal requiring removal
■    Neuromas  of  the dorsal sensory branch of  the radial and ulnar nerves
■    Carpal  tunnel syndrome
■    Reflex sympathetic dystrophy
■    Wrist and hand stiffness

REFERENCES

1.  Bradway JK,  Amadio  PC,  Cooney  WP.  Open reduction and internal fixation of displaced comminuted intraarticular fractures of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71A:839–847.
2.  Doi K,  Hatturi T,  Otsuka  K,  et al. Intraarticular fractures of the distal aspect of the radius arthroscopically assisted reduction compared with  open  reduction  and  internal fixation.   J Bone  Joint  Surg  Am
1999;81A:1093–1110.
3.  Edwards CC III, Harasztic J, McGillivary GR, et al. Intraarticular distal radius fractures: arthroscopic assessment of  radiographically assisted reduction. J Hand  Surg Am 2001;26A:1036–1041.
4.  Fernandez DL,  Geissler WB.  Treatment of  displaced articular fractures of the radius. J Hand  Surg Am 1991;16:375–384.
5.  Geissler  WB.  Arthroscopically  assisted reduction  of  intra-articular fractures of the distal radius. Hand  Clin  1995;11:19–29.
6. Geissler WB.  Intra-articular distal radius fractures: the role of arthroscopy? Hand  Clin  2005;21:407–416.
7.  Geissler  WB,  Freeland  AE.   Arthroscopically  assisted reduction  of intra-articular distal radial fractures. Clin  Orthop  Relat  Res  1996;
327:125–134.
8.  Geissler WB, Freeland AE,  Savoie FH,  et al. Intracarpal soft-tissue lesions associated with an intra-articular fracture of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78A:357–365.
9.  Geissler  WB,   Savoie  FH.    Arthroscopic   techniques  of   the  wrist.
Mediguide to Orthopedics 1992;11:1–8.
10.  Hanker GJ. Wrist arthroscopy in distal radius fractures. Proceedings of the Arthroscopy Association North America Annual Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, October  7–9, 1993.
11.  Hixon  ML, Fitzrandolph R,  McAndrew  M,  et al. Acute ligamentous tears of the wrist associated with Colles fractures. Proceedings of the Annual  Meeting  of  the American  Society for Surgery of  the Hand, Baltimore, 1989.
12.  Hollingworth  R,  Morris  J. The importance of  the ulnar side of  the wrist in fractures of the distal end of the radius. Injury 1976;7:263.
13.  Knirk JL,  Jupiter JB.  Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68A:647–658.
14.  Lafontaine M,  Hardy  D,  Delince P. Stability assessment of distal radius fractures. Injury 1989;20:208–210.
15.  Levy HJ, Glickel  SZ.  Arthroscopic assisted internal fixation  of intraarticular wrist fractures. Arthroscopy 1993;9:122–123.
16.  Lindau T.  Treatment of injuries to the ulnar side of the wrist occurring with distal radial fractures. Hand  Clin  2005;21:417–425.
2182
17.  Melone  CP.   Articular  fractures of  the  distal  radius.  Orthop   Clin
North  Am 1984;15:217–235.
18.  Mohanti  RC, Kar  N.  Study of triangular fibrocartilage of the wrist joint in Colles fracture. Injury 1979;11:311–324.
19.  Mudgal  CS,  Jones WA.  Scapholunate diastasis: a component of fractures of the distal radius. J Hand  Surg Br 1990;15:503–505.
20.  Ruch DS,  Vallee J, Poehling GG, et al. Arthroscopic reduction versus fluoroscopic reduction in the management of intra-articular distal radius fractures. Arthroscopy 2004;20:225–230.
21.  Short WH, Palmer AK,  Werner FW,  et al. A biomechanical study of distal radial fractures. J Hand  Surg Am 1987;12:529–534.
22.  Stewart NJ, Berger RA.  Comparison study of arthroscopic as open reduction of comminuted distal radius fractures. Abstract. Presented at the 53rd   Annual Meeting of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand.  January 11, 1998, Scottsdale, AZ.
23.  Trumble  TE,  Schmitt  SR,  Vedder  NB.   Factors affecting  functional outcome of  displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg Am 1994;19:325–340.

 

Dr. Mohammed Hutaif

About the Author: Prof. Dr. Mohammed Hutaif

Vice Dean of the Faculty of Medicine at Sana'a University and a leading consultant in orthopedic and spinal surgery. Learn more about my expertise and achievements.

Share this article