Menu

Question 4761

Topic: Cervical Spine

During the late cocking and early acceleration phases of throwing, which specific component of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) complex of the elbow serves as the primary restraint to valgus stress?

. Anterior band of the anterior bundle
. Posterior band of the anterior bundle
. Posterior bundle
. Transverse ligament
. Radial collateral ligament

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Anterior band of the anterior bundle


Explanation

The anterior bundle of the UCL is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow. It is further divided into the anterior and posterior bands. The anterior band is tight in extension and serves as the primary restraint to valgus stress throughout the critical degrees of flexion seen during the acceleration phase of throwing.

Question 4762

Topic: Cervical Spine

A 21-year-old collegiate baseball pitcher is undergoing an ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) reconstruction utilizing an autograft.

Which native anatomical structure is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow during the late cocking and early acceleration phases of throwing?

. Anterior bundle of the UCL
. Posterior bundle of the UCL
. Transverse ligament of the elbow
. Radial collateral ligament
. Flexor-pronator muscle mass

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Anterior bundle of the UCL


Explanation

The anterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow, particularly between 30 and 120 degrees of flexion, which corresponds to the late cocking and early acceleration phases of throwing. The posterior bundle is a secondary restraint, and the transverse ligament provides no significant stability.

Question 4763

Topic: Cervical Spine

A 22-year-old collegiate baseball pitcher reports insidious onset of medial elbow pain and decreased pitching velocity. Physical examination reveals pain with the moving valgus stress test. An MRI confirms a high-grade partial tear of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL). Which specific anatomic structure is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow during the late cocking and early acceleration phases of throwing?

. Posterior bundle of the UCL
. Transverse ligament of the UCL
. Anterior bundle of the UCL
. Flexor carpi ulnaris aponeurosis
. Radial collateral ligament

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Anterior bundle of the UCL


Explanation

The ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) complex of the elbow consists of the anterior bundle, posterior bundle, and transverse ligament. The anterior bundle is the primary restraint to valgus stress at the elbow from 30 to 120 degrees of flexion, which perfectly correlates with the elbow position during the late cocking and early acceleration phases of the throwing motion. The posterior bundle provides restraint in deep flexion, and the transverse ligament contributes little to no valgus stability.

Question 4764

Topic: 6. Spine

A 7-year-old girl with Down syndrome wishes to participate in Special Olympics gymnastics. She is completely asymptomatic, has no history of neck pain or weakness, and her neurologic examination is normal. Based on the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) guidelines, what is the recommendation regarding pre-participation cervical spine screening?

. Routine dynamic flexion-extension cervical radiographs are mandatory
. An MRI of the cervical spine is required
. Screening radiographs are not recommended for asymptomatic individuals
. She is contraindicated from participating in gymnastics
. A CT scan of the craniovertebral junction is indicated

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Screening radiographs are not recommended for asymptomatic individuals


Explanation

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) revised its guidelines, stating that routine cervical spine radiographs in asymptomatic children with Down syndrome are not indicated prior to sports participation, as they have poor predictive value for catastrophic spinal cord injury. Targeted radiographic screening is recommended only for patients with symptomatic neck pain, radiculopathy, or myelopathy.

Question 4765

Topic: 6. Spine

A 10-year-old boy with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type II presents with a progressive, collapsing thoracolumbar neuromuscular scoliosis measuring 85 degrees. He is non-ambulatory, has pelvic obliquity, and his forced vital capacity (FVC) is 40% of predicted. He underwent placement of magnetically controlled growing rods at age 5, which have now reached their maximum excursion. What is the most definitive surgical option at this stage?

. Exchange of the magnetic growing rods for longer magnetic rods
. Definitive posterior spinal fusion from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis
. Anterior spinal fusion and instrumentation alone
. Placement of a Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) device
. Observation until skeletal maturity with bracing

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Definitive posterior spinal fusion from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis


Explanation

This patient has reached the stage where his growth-friendly instrumentation (magnetic rods) has 'graduated' or 'maxed out.' In a 10-year-old with a severe, progressive collapsing neuromuscular scoliosis (like in SMA) and pelvic obliquity, sufficient spinal length has usually been achieved. The definitive and standard management upon graduation from a growing construct is a definitive posterior spinal fusion (PSF). For non-ambulatory patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic obliquity, the fusion typically extends from the upper thoracic spine down to the pelvis to restore sitting balance, correct the pelvic obliquity, and provide a stable spine for pulmonary function and wheelchair seating.

Question 4766

Topic: Thoracolumbar Spine & Deformity

A 14-year-old male athlete presents with lower back pain and notably tight hamstrings. A lateral lumbar radiograph reveals a grade II isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1.

He has failed 6 months of nonoperative management, including bracing, physical therapy, and activity modification. What is the most appropriate surgical treatment?

. Pars repair with bone grafting
. L5-S1 in situ posterolateral arthrodesis
. L5 laminectomy without fusion
. L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) alone
. Epidural steroid injections

Correct Answer & Explanation

. L5-S1 in situ posterolateral arthrodesis


Explanation

For pediatric and adolescent patients with symptomatic low-grade (Grade I or II) isthmic spondylolisthesis who fail comprehensive conservative management, L5-S1 in situ posterolateral arthrodesis is the surgical standard of care. Pars repairs (e.g., Buck or Scott wiring) are generally reserved for young patients with a pars defect but minimal or no slip (typically L1-L4, not L5-S1). Laminectomy alone is contraindicated in children as it promotes instability and further slippage.

Question 4767

Topic: 6. Spine

A 3-year-old girl is diagnosed with infantile idiopathic scoliosis. Radiographs reveal a primary left thoracic curve of 35 degrees. The rib-vertebra angle difference (RVAD) of Mehta is measured at 25 degrees. What is the most appropriate initial management for this patient to control deformity progression?

. Observation with repeat standing radiographs in 6 months
. Rigid thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) bracing
. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) Mehta casting
. Surgical insertion of magnetically controlled growing rods
. Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) Mehta casting


Explanation

Infantile idiopathic scoliosis with a curve > 30 degrees and an RVAD > 20 degrees has a high likelihood of rapid progression. Serial elongation-derotation-flexion (EDF) casting, also known as Mehta casting, is the gold standard initial management for progressive early-onset scoliosis in this age group. It has been shown to effectively control curve progression, allow for pulmonary development, and in some cases, completely resolve the deformity. Bracing is less effective in controlling severe rotation in infantile progressive curves.

Question 4768

Topic: 6. Spine

A 14-year-old female gymnast complains of lower back pain that worsens with extension and twisting movements. Physical examination reveals tight hamstrings and pain elicited on the single-leg hyperextension test (Stork test). Standing AP and lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine show no distinct abnormalities. If advanced imaging is to be ordered to confirm an acute pars interarticularis stress reaction, which imaging modality is highly sensitive and best avoids ionizing radiation?

. Computed Tomography (CT) scan
. Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) bone scan
. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine
. Dynamic flexion-extension radiographs
. Ultrasound of the lumbar spine

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine


Explanation

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine, specifically utilizing T2-weighted and STIR sequences, is highly sensitive for detecting bone marrow edema indicative of an acute pars stress reaction (early spondylolysis). Unlike SPECT scans or CT scans, MRI has the significant advantage of not exposing the pediatric patient to ionizing radiation, making it the preferred advanced imaging modality for evaluating suspected acute pars pathology in young athletes when plain radiographs are negative.

Question 4769

Topic: Thoracolumbar Spine & Deformity
A 14-year-old female gymnast presents with persistent lower back pain. Radiographs reveal an isthmic spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 with a slip of 60% (Meyerding Grade III). She has failed 6 months of nonoperative management. What is the most appropriate surgical intervention?
. Pars interarticularis defect repair directly
. L5-S1 laminectomy and decompression alone
. L5-S1 in situ posterolateral fusion
. L4-S1 posterior spinal fusion without instrumentation
. Cervical to sacral spinal fusion

Correct Answer & Explanation

. L5-S1 in situ posterolateral fusion


Explanation

For symptomatic high-grade (>50% slip) isthmic spondylolisthesis that fails conservative care, L5-S1 in situ posterolateral fusion (typically with instrumentation) is the standard treatment to prevent further progression.

Question 4770

Topic: 6. Spine

A 2-year-old child with achondroplasia presents with hypotonia, developmental delay, and central sleep apnea. Which of the following is the most critical screening study to obtain to determine the cause of these symptoms?

. Cervical spine flexion-extension radiographs
. MRI of the craniovertebral junction
. CT scan of the temporal bones
. Polysomnography
. Lumbar spine MRI

Correct Answer & Explanation

. MRI of the craniovertebral junction


Explanation

Children with achondroplasia are at high risk for foramen magnum stenosis, which can cause cervicomedullary compression leading to central sleep apnea, hypotonia, and sudden death. MRI of the craniovertebral junction is the imaging modality of choice to assess this.

Question 4771

Topic: 6. Spine

A 65-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis and a completely fused lumbosacral spine is scheduled for a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). How does this patient's spinopelvic stiffness alter the targeted functional safe zone for acetabular cup positioning compared to a patient with normal spinal mobility?

. The cup should be placed in less anteversion to prevent anterior dislocation.
. The cup should be placed in increased anteversion to compensate for the lack of posterior pelvic tilt during sitting.
. The cup should be placed with increased inclination to improve abductor mechanics.
. Spinopelvic stiffness has no significant effect on the functional safe zone.
. The femoral stem should be placed in retroversion to match the stiff pelvis.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. The cup should be placed in increased anteversion to compensate for the lack of posterior pelvic tilt during sitting.


Explanation

A stiff spine prevents the normal posterior pelvic tilt that occurs during sitting, which naturally increases functional acetabular anteversion. To prevent anterior impingement and posterior dislocation when sitting, the cup may require increased anteversion.

Question 4772

Topic: 6. Spine

A 65-year-old man is scheduled to undergo a total hip arthroplasty (THA). Preoperative radiographs reveal spontaneous fusion of the lumbar spine from L2 to S1 secondary to diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. How does this spinal stiffness affect acetabular dynamics and dislocation risk during the transition from standing to sitting?

. Acetabular anteversion increases significantly, predisposing to anterior dislocation.
. Acetabular anteversion changes minimally, predisposing to posterior dislocation.
. Acetabular retroversion increases significantly, predisposing to posterior dislocation.
. Pelvic tilt increases compensatory to the spinal stiffness, reducing dislocation risk.
. The spinopelvic relationship remains unaffected, maintaining standard dislocation risk.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Acetabular anteversion changes minimally, predisposing to posterior dislocation.


Explanation

In a patient with a stiff spine, the pelvis cannot appropriately tilt posteriorly when transitioning from standing to sitting. Consequently, acetabular anteversion changes minimally (fails to increase), leading to anterior impingement and a high risk of posterior dislocation.

Question 4773

Topic: 6. Spine

A 70-year-old man is scheduled for a THA. He has a history of a rigid multilevel lumbar spinal fusion from L2 to the sacrum. How should acetabular cup placement be adjusted to minimize the risk of posterior dislocation during sitting?

. Increase cup anteversion and inclination
. Decrease cup anteversion and inclination
. Increase cup anteversion and decrease inclination
. Decrease cup anteversion and increase inclination
. Place the cup in standard 15 degrees of anteversion and 40 degrees of inclination

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increase cup anteversion and inclination


Explanation

Patients with a lumbosacral fusion have a stiff spine (spinopelvic stiffness) and lack the normal increase in posterior pelvic tilt during sitting. To prevent anterior impingement and subsequent posterior dislocation during flexion, the acetabular cup should be placed with increased anteversion and inclination.

Question 4774

Topic: 6. Spine

A 72-year-old woman is scheduled for a total hip arthroplasty (THA) for severe right hip osteoarthritis. She has a history of a multi-level lumbar spinal fusion from L2 to S1. How does this spinal pathology significantly alter her spinopelvic kinematics during the transition from standing to sitting?

. The pelvis tilts posteriorly more than normal, requiring less hip flexion to sit.
. The pelvis tilts anteriorly more than normal, significantly increasing the risk of anterior dislocation.
. The pelvis fails to tilt posteriorly adequately, requiring more hip flexion and increasing the risk of anterior impingement and posterior dislocation.
. The pelvis fails to tilt anteriorly adequately, increasing the risk of posterior impingement and anterior dislocation.
. Spinopelvic motion remains unchanged, but femoral version must be increased to compensate for lumbar stiffness.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. The pelvis fails to tilt posteriorly adequately, requiring more hip flexion and increasing the risk of anterior impingement and posterior dislocation.


Explanation

In a healthy spine, transitioning from standing to sitting is accompanied by posterior pelvic tilt, which increases functional acetabular anteversion and allows the femur to flex without impinging on the anterior acetabular rim. Patients with a stiff lumbar spine (e.g., from multilevel fusion) cannot achieve this normal posterior pelvic tilt. Consequently, the acetabulum fails to 'open up' anteriorly. To achieve a seated position, the patient requires excessive hip flexion, which leads to anterior impingement between the femur and the anterior rim of the acetabulum. This impingement acts as a fulcrum, predisposing the hip to posterior dislocation.

Question 4775

Topic: 6. Spine

A 68-year-old man with a history of a long spinal fusion from T10 to the pelvis is planned for a total hip arthroplasty. How does his spinal pathology alter the target placement of his acetabular component compared to a patient with normal spinopelvic mobility?

. The cup requires less anteversion and less abduction.
. The cup requires more anteversion and more abduction.
. The cup should be placed in neutral version.
. The spinal fusion does not alter the target cup position.
. The cup requires increased retroversion and decreased abduction.

Correct Answer & Explanation

. The cup requires more anteversion and more abduction.


Explanation

Patients with spinopelvic stiffness (e.g., prior lumbopelvic fusion) cannot undergo normal posterior pelvic tilt during hip flexion. To prevent anterior bony impingement and subsequent posterior dislocation during sitting, the acetabular component must be placed in greater anteversion and abduction.

Question 4776

Topic: 6. Spine

A 68-year-old woman is undergoing a primary total hip arthroplasty. She has a prior spinal fusion from L2 to the pelvis. Preoperative standing and sitting lateral radiographs show no change in her pelvic tilt. To minimize the risk of posterior dislocation, how should the acetabular component be positioned compared to a patient with normal spino-pelvic mobility?

. Increased anteversion
. Decreased anteversion
. Increased inclination only
. Decreased inclination
. Standard positioning is appropriate

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increased anteversion


Explanation

In a patient with a stiff spino-pelvic segment (fusion to pelvis), the pelvis fails to retrovert during sitting. This requires the acetabular component to be placed in increased anteversion to clear the femur and prevent posterior dislocation during hip flexion.

Question 4777

Topic: 6. Spine

A 55-year-old man with ankylosing spondylitis and a fused lumbar spine is undergoing THA. Preoperative standing and sitting lateral spinopelvic radiographs show less than 10 degrees of change in pelvic tilt between positions. How should the acetabular component positioning be adjusted to minimize dislocation risk?

. Target increased anteversion and slightly increased inclination
. Target decreased anteversion and decreased inclination
. Maintain standard Lewinnek safe zone positioning
. Target increased retroversion to accommodate the stiff spine
. Target high inclination and low anteversion

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Target increased anteversion and slightly increased inclination


Explanation

In a stiff spine, the pelvis fails to retrovert during sitting, leaving the acetabulum relatively under-anteverted and increasing the risk of anterior impingement and posterior dislocation. The cup should be placed in more anteversion to accommodate sitting.

Question 4778

Topic: 6. Spine

A 72-year-old man with previous lumbar fusion from L2 to S1 is scheduled for a total hip arthroplasty. Flexion-extension seating radiographs demonstrate less than 10 degrees of change in his pelvic tilt. To minimize the risk of posterior dislocation, how should the acetabular component be positioned compared to a patient with normal spinopelvic mechanics?

. Increased anteversion and increased inclination
. Decreased anteversion and decreased inclination
. Standard safe zone placement
. Decreased anteversion and increased inclination
. Increased anteversion and decreased inclination

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increased anteversion and increased inclination


Explanation

Patients with a stiff spine cannot increase pelvic tilt when sitting, requiring the cup to be placed in greater anteversion and inclination to accommodate hip flexion. This prevents anterior impingement and subsequent posterior dislocation.

Question 4779

Topic: 6. Spine

A 70-year-old female with a history of a solid multi-level lumbar spine fusion (L2-S1) presents for right THA for primary osteoarthritis. What modification regarding acetabular component positioning should be considered to minimize the risk of dislocation, compared to a patient with a normal mobile lumbar spine?

. Increase the anteversion of the acetabular component
. Decrease the anteversion of the acetabular component
. Increase the inclination of the acetabular component to 55 degrees
. Position the cup in 0 degrees of version
. Position the cup in 10 degrees of retroversion

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increase the anteversion of the acetabular component


Explanation

Patients with a fused or stiff lumbar spine fail to increase their pelvic tilt when transitioning from standing to sitting. Normally, posterior pelvic tilt during sitting increases functional acetabular anteversion, preventing anterior impingement and posterior dislocation. Because these patients have reduced spinopelvic mobility, the acetabular component should be placed in slightly more anteversion than the standard 'safe zone' to compensate for the lack of functional anteversion during sitting.

Question 4780

Topic: 6. Spine

A 72-year-old male is undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Preoperative standing and sitting lateral radiographs reveal a fused lumbar spine from L2 to the sacrum, with no change in pelvic tilt between positions. Which of the following adjustments to the acetabular component position is recommended to minimize the risk of posterior dislocation when the patient sits?

. Decrease both anteversion and inclination
. Increase both anteversion and inclination
. Maintain standard 15 degrees of anteversion and 40 degrees of inclination
. Increase anteversion but decrease inclination
. Utilize a constrained liner exclusively

Correct Answer & Explanation

. Increase both anteversion and inclination


Explanation

In a patient with a stiff lumbar spine, the pelvis fails to roll posteriorly (retrovert) when transitioning from standing to sitting. Normally, this posterior pelvic tilt dynamically increases functional acetabular anteversion, allowing clearance for hip flexion. A stiff spine removes this compensatory mechanism, significantly increasing the risk of anterior impingement and subsequent posterior dislocation during sitting. To compensate, the surgeon should implant the cup with increased anteversion and inclination (while remaining within safe zones) to mimic the missing dynamic clearance.