WRIST AND HAND‌

 

CHAPTER

4

 

WRIST AND HAND

 

 

LIGAMENT/INSTABILITY TESTS

114

 

Piano key test 114

Radial collateral ligament stress test 115

Ulnar collateral ligament stress test 117

Scaphoid shift test 119

Lunotriquetral shear test 122

Capitate apprehension test 124

 

TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE

COMPLEX (TFCC) TESTS

127

 

TFCC load test 127

 

THUMB TESTS

129

 

Axial compression test 129

Finkelstein’s test 131

Ulnar collateral ligament laxity test 133

CARPAL TUNNEL TESTS

135

 

Phalen’s test 135

Tinel’s test 141

Carpal compression test 145

113

 

LIGAMENT/INSTABILITY TESTS

Piano key test

 

Purpose

To detect the presence of instability at the inferior radio-ulnar joint (IRUJ).

Technique

Patient position

Sitting with the forearm fully pronated and supported on a table.

Clinician position

Sitting facing the patient, one hand stabilizes the patient’s hand in a neutral position while, approaching from the radial aspect, the index and middle fingers of the other hand are placed over the head of the ulna with the thumb providing some counterpressure under the base of the radius.

Action

Downward pressure is applied by the fingers on the distal ulna, mimicking the action of pressing down a piano key.

Positive test

Pain accompanied by excess movement and a loss of the normal ligamentous end-feel is noted.

Clinical context

Isolated involvement of the IRUJ is rare and is usually associated with more significant injury at the wrist (i.e. fracture or dislocation).

 

 

 

Fig. 4.1 ● Piano key test.

 

Minor disruption may cause pain as the primary sign and this would be well localized with tenderness easily elicited by palpation (see clinical tip). Pain at the end of passive pronation and supination would also be provocative. Where ligament disruption has occurred, excess movement will be accompanied by apprehension during certain activities, particularly in weight-bearing positions where its lack of stability is more seriously tested.

The IRUJ is often involved in inflammatory arthritis and in more severe cases, the synovitis afflicting the joint causes a destructive process resulting in pronounced loss of rotation, dorsal prominence and instability of the ulna, as well as localized swelling and loss of the normal function of the adjacent extensor carpi ulnaris, a condition known as caput ulnae syndrome (Brown & Neumann 2004). Given the associated joint stiffness, despite the instability at the IRUJ, the piano key test may not yield a positive result.

 

Clinical tip

The joint line is easily palpable on the dorsum of the lower forearm. The width of the wrist dorsally can be divided into three equal portions, making the joint line the marker between the most medial and middle sections.

If the result of this test is ambiguous further accessory testing of the IRUJ can be done to detect changes in range and end-feel.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

Piano key test

Especially useful to determine level of instability – only a very unstable joint will behave like a true ‘piano key’.

 

 

 

Radial collateral ligament stress test

Aka

Wrist adduction test

 

Purpose

To stress the radial collateral ligament (RCL) and lateral capsule of the wrist in order to detect pain and/or laxity.

Technique

Patient position

Sitting with the wrist supported on a table.

Clinician position

One hand fixes the distal forearm by wrapping the fingers around the radius and ulna while the other grasps the hand, taking care not to involve the fingers or thumb.

Action

With the forearm fixed, the distal hand takes the wrist into ulnar deviation (wrist adduction) where normal range is between 30° and 45°.

Positive test

Pain is the most likely outcome but further evaluation would be needed if excessive range was noted suggesting significant disruption to the joint.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.2 ● Radial collateral ligament stress test.

 

 

Clinical context

This test is most likely to identify an isolated sprain of the RCL where localized pain around the anatomical snuffbox would be the primary complaint. Depending on the severity of the trauma, a varying but equal degree of flexion/extension restriction may also be

 

present at the wrist as the ligament blends with, and reinforces, the lateral joint capsule, thereby causing capsular limitation. As the history is usually traumatic, careful screening is necessary (including X-ray evaluation in most cases) to eliminate fracture of the carpus –the scaphoid being the usual culprit. With pain reported in this area, osteoarthritis of the trapeziofirstmetacarpal joint (basal joint of the thumb; see axial compression test, p. 129) and de Quervain’s tenosynovitis (see Finkelstein’s test, p. 131) are other possible diagnoses to consider.

Clinical tip

The RCL can be found by identifying the radial styloid at the base of the anatomical snuffbox and moving the finger slightly distally with the wrist in a degree of radial deviation. The ligament and capsule are relaxed in this position. Keeping the finger in place, the RCL tautens (if intact) and becomes easily palpable as the wrist is passively taken into ulnar deviation.

Make sure the patient’s thumb is not involved in this movement in order to avoid stress being placed on the thumb abductor and extensor tendons which may result in a false positive finding being recorded.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

Radial collateral ligament stress test

Usually included as part of radiocarpal assessment without specifically testing the ligaments as they are rarely injured in isolation.

 

 

 

Ulnar collateral ligament stress test

Aka

Wrist abduction test

Purpose

To stress the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) and medial capsule of the wrist in order to detect pain and/or laxity.

Technique

Patient position

Sitting with the wrist supported on a table.

 

Clinician position

One hand fixes the distal forearm by wrapping fingers around the radius and ulna while the other grasps the hand, taking care not to involve the fingers or thumb.

Action

With the forearm fixed, the distal hand takes the wrist into radial deviation (wrist abduction) where normal range is around 15°.

Positive test

Pain is the most likely outcome but further evaluation would be needed if excessive range was noted, suggesting significant disruption to the joint.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.3 ● Ulnar collateral ligament stress test.

 

 

Clinical context

The patient reports localized pain located at the inner, medial aspect of the wrist joint. If the UCL stress test is the only positive test, confirmation of the lesion can be made by palpation – tenderness is usually identifiable at its origin on the ulnar styloid. Isolated injury to the UCL is rare and, because of its anatomical connection, is more commonly associated with injury to the triangular carti-laginous complex (see TFCC test, p. 127). Medial wrist pain may also emanate from the inferior radio-ulnar joint (see piano key test. p. 114) and the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon.

Clinical tip

The ligament is most easily identified by finding the styloid with the wrist in ulnar deviation and then passively moving the wrist radially until the ligament can be felt tautening under the finger.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

Ulnar collateral ligament stress test

Usually included as part of radiocarpal assessment without specifically testing the ligaments as they are rarely injured in isolation.

 

 

 

Scaphoid shift test

Aka

Watson test

Purpose

To establish the presence of abnormal movement of the scaphoid and lunate bones indicating instability or subluxation.

Technique

Patient position

The patient is seated with the flexed elbow resting on a table, the forearm vertically positioned and fully pronated so that the patient’s palm faces the clinician.

Clinician position

Seated facing the patient, the examiner places the thumb in the palm and wraps the fingers around the metacarpals on the dorsum of the hand. The thumb of the second hand is placed over the tuber-cle of the scaphoid and counterpressure applied with the other fingers over the dorsum of the lower radius.

Action

Firm pressure is applied on the scaphoid while the hand is taken initially into ulnar deviation and slight extension to offload the scapholunate articulation (Fig. 4.4A). Maintaining the pressure on the scaphoid, the wrist is then taken slowly into radial deviation and slight flexion creating a subluxation force that stresses the articulation and exposes instability if present (Fig. 4.4B).

Positive test

Excessive movement of the scaphoid in relation to the lunate is detected along with some pain and/or apprehension. If subluxation occurs the proximal pole of the scaphoid shifts dorsally over the dorsal rim of the radius. Removing the pressure from the palmar aspect of the scaphoid and returning the wrist into some ulnar

 

deviation and extension will cause the scaphoid to shift back in a palmar direction to its reduced, normal position.

 

A

B

 

 

Fig. 4.4 ● Scaphoid shift test: unloaded start position (A) and stress applied to the scapholunate joint (B).

 

Clinical context

Although comparatively rare, the instability that results from disruption of the scapholunate articulation is the most common carpal instability. A complete tear of the scapholunate ligaments, usually resulting from a severe hyperextension injury, will lead to significant scapholunate dissociation and disruption to the normal motion of the proximal carpal bones during wrist movement. Because of the loss of connection between the scaphoid and lunate, the scaphoid rotates into a degree of flexion leaving the lunate and triquetral free to rotate into extension which causes pain, an inability to weight-bear on the wrist and an overall loss of function (Placzek & Boyce 2006). Chronic instability of the joint also strongly predisposes to a recognized sequence of osteoarthritis involving the unstable capito-lunate and capitoscaphoid articulations (particularly in the presence of a dorsally subluxed capitate) and, more latterly, the radioscaphoid and radiolunate joints, a sequence known as scapholunate advance collapse (SLAC) (Miller & Schweitzer 2005).

 

The normal extent of separation between the scaphoid and lunate bones should be less than 2 mm (Gross et al 2002) but a diastasis of more than 3 mm is pathognomonic of scapholunate dissociation and should be detectable on plain X-rays (McRae 1990). The evident space between the bones is known as the Terry Thomas sign, named after the 1960s comedian who famously had a gap between his two front teeth (Placzek & Boyce 2006).

Using a cadaver model where the wrist was progressively loaded in extension and ulnar deviation (the most common mechanism of injury), a sequential, four-staged pattern of injury was noted; scapholunate diastasis, dorsal subluxation of the capitate, disruption of the lunotriquetral ligament and complete dislocation of the scapholunate articulation (Brown & Neumann 2004). Subluxation of the capitate (see clinical tip) is therefore usually associated with injury to the proximal carpus although it does not have to involve catastrophic disruption of the scapholunate articulation (see capitate apprehension test, p. 124).

Clinical tip

It is not always necessary to reproduce subluxation with this test as it is usually painful for the patient and they are likely to indicate apprehension as the forces are gradually applied. The presence of pain and apprehension are good indicators of instability and, as an alternative, detecting increased excursion without causing subluxation can be achieved by applying an anterior/posterior glide to the scaphoid in a neutral position and comparing with the opposite side. The possibility of capitate subluxation should be considered by observing the dorsum of the wrist in a flexed position where a bony prominence may be noted. Passive wrist extension will also be pain-

fully blocked, particularly on weight-bearing.

Care should be taken when interpreting the findings as up to 30% of healthy wrists can give a false positive result due to general ligamentous laxity at the wrist. It is thought that repeating this dynamically (see variations), particularly when the patient makes a fist, reduces this tendency (Weiss & Finkelstein 2005).

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

Scaphoid shift test

A tricky test to perform, as well as interpret, but very useful once perfected.

 

Variations

The scaphoid stress test is a simple modification where the patient actively moves the wrist from ulnar to radial deviation while the scaphoid is stabilized by the examiner in the same way. Apprehension and/or a painful clunk during the movement demonstrates dynamic subluxation.

 

 

 

Lunotriquetral shear test

Aka Ballottement test Reagan’s test Shuck test

Purpose

To establish the presence of abnormal movement of the lunate and triquetral bones indicating instability or subluxation.

 

Technique

Patient position

The patient is seated with the forearm supinated and comfortably supported on a table.

Clinician position

Seated facing the patient, the clinician, using a pincer grip, stabilizes the lunate by placing a thumb on its palmar surface and fixes the dorsal surface with the index finger. The other hand grasps the combined bony mass of the pisiform and triquetral using the same pincer grip.

Action

With the lunate stabilized, the examiner moves the triquetral/ pisiform in an anteroposterior direction. The test can be reversed by stabilizing the triquetral/pisiform and moving the lunate in the same plane.

Positive test

Excessive mobility of the triquetral in relation to the lunate when compared to the unaffected side is detected along with pain. Crepitus on movement is also sometimes noted.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.5 ● Lunotriquetral shear test.

 

Clinical context

Differing descriptions for this test can be found in the literature and this has led to the same test being assigned several names. Injury to the lunotriquetral articulation is uncommonly encountered (see scaphoid shift test, p. 119) requiring impact in extension and radial deviation (Brown & Neumann 2004). A strain to the lunotriquetral ligament may be evident with localized tenderness and a positive test, but if the trauma has been sufficiently significant to cause disruption of the articulation, normal kinematics will be lost. The combined unit of the scaphoid and lunate rotate into flexion leaving the untethered triquetral to drift into extension. Pain, apprehension, a reluctance to move and weakness will all be reported by the patient, with a more significant injury likely to predispose to osteoarthritis (Placzek & Boyce 2006). Lunotriquetral ligament injury is often associated with triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears (see TFCC test, p. 127) and MRI can therefore be helpful in making the distinction (Miller & Schweitzer 2005). There are no studies examining the reliability of this test and considerable skill is required to interpret the findings meaningfully.

 

Clinical tip

An isolated injury to the lunotriquetral ligament does not usually produce a static diastasis between the lunate and triquetral so there may be dynamic and functional instability present but a normal plain X-ray reported.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★

Lunotriquetral shear test

It is important to establish what is normal excursion on the unaffected side as differences in range can be subtle.

 

Related tests

Murphy’s sign may also indicate the presence of lunate dislocation. The patient is asked to make a fist and the relationship between the heads of the 2nd, 3rd and 4th metacarpals is examined. Normally the head of the 3rd metacarpal extends more distally but where the lunate has dislocated, it remains in line with the heads of the other two metacarpals.

 

 

 

Capitate apprehension test

Aka

Capitate displacement test

Purpose

To determine the presence of capitate instability.

Technique

Patient position

The patient sits with the forearm supinated and supported on a table.

Clinician position

Facing the patient, one of the examiner’s thumbs is placed over the palmar aspect of the capitate bone reinforced with the thumb of the other hand. The fingers of both hands are then wrapped around the dorsum of the patient’s hand ensuring the wrist is supported in a neutral position and taking care with the handhold not to involve the patient’s thumb.

Action

The examiner pushes the capitate posteriorly with both thumbs, ensuring the hand is stabilized by the fingers placed around the dorsum of the wrist.

 

Positive test

Pain and/or apprehension is reproduced as the posterior pressure is applied and this is sometimes accompanied by a click.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.6 ● Capitate apprehension test.

 

Clinical context

Capitate subluxation is most commonly associated with instability at the scapholunate articulation (see scaphoid shift test, p. 119), usually resulting from a fall on an outstretched hand. Laxity or rupture of the scapholunate ligaments creates a static or dynamic diastasis that leaves the proximal capitate vulnerable to dorsal subluxation, either at the time of the injury or subsequently. In the presence of laxity, the capitate may sublux and reduce recurrently. When subluxed, the capitate can become more prominent and this is best observed on the dorsum of the hand with the wrist in a flexed position. Passive wrist extension will also be painfully blocked particularly when weight-bearing and localized pain can be elicited on full passive wrist flexion (Atkins et al 2010).

 

Clinical tip

The capitate is located at the base of the 3rd metacarpal and can more easily be palpated on the dorsum of the wrist. There is normally a palpable ‘dip’ over the capitate in the neutral position although this is lost if subluxation has occurred.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★

Capitate apprehension test

Only used when a generalized mid-carpal instability is suspected with a patient complaining of episodic subluxation and pain.

Related tests

The midcarpal pivot shift test aims to identify instability as a result of traumatic attenuation of the scapholunate or lunotriquetral ligaments as midcarpal instability is often associated with concurrent injury to these articulations. The patient sits with the elbow at 90° with the supinated forearm supported on a table. The examiner stabilizes the distal forearm with one hand and, supporting the patient’s hand in a neutral position with the other, takes the wrist from a fully radially deviated position (Fig. 4.7A) into full ulnar deviation (Fig. 4.7B). Instead of a normal smooth movement, it is irregular and accompanied by a painful clunk which indicates a positive finding. The clunk is thought to result from the sudden movement or shift of the capitate away from the lunate as a result of the ligamentous laxity.

 

A

B

 

 

Fig. 4.7 ● Midcarpal pivot shift. Start position (A). End position stressing the scapholunate and lunotriquetral articulations (B).

 

Lichtman’s test is a variation of the midcarpal pivot shift test where axial compression is added to the movement. Pain and/or dorsal movement of the capitate are considered to be positive findings.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

Lichtman’s test

This test can be hard to do well and interpret the findings accurately.

 

TRIANGULAR FIBROCARTILAGE COMPLEX

(TFCC) TESTS

 

 

 

TFCC load test

Aka

Ulnar meniscal grind test

Purpose

To reproduce pain and/or apprehension indicating a tear or degeneration of the TFCC.

Technique

Patient position

Sitting or standing.

Clinician position

Facing the patient, the examiner stabilizes the patient’s forearm with one hand and, as if shaking hands, places their other hand in the palm where it is held firmly.

Action

Axial compression is then applied through the patient’s hand while ulnar deviation is added. This part of the manoeuvre has been described as the ulnar impaction test. This may be enough to reproduce localized pain at the base of the ulna negating the need for further loading. If asymptomatic, stress on the TFCC is increased by ‘scooping’ the hand from flexion to extension while maintaining the ulnar deviation and compression (see Fig. 4.8).

Positive test

Localized pain at the ulnar side of the wrist joint is sometimes accompanied by apprehension and/or a click or crepitus on movement.

Clinical context

The TFCC, sometimes referred to as the ulnar articular disc, is a homogeneous structure comprising of the dorsal and palmar radioulnar ligaments, a meniscus, the ulnar collateral ligament and the sheath of the extensor carpi ulnaris (Palmer & Werner 1981). It acts as the primary soft tissue stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint and takes 20% of the compressive load across the wrist. It is thickest (approx. 5 mm) at its ulnar insertion but thinner (2 mm) and more vulnerable to injury nearer to its radial origin which, unsurprisingly, is the most common site of TFCC tears (Miller & Schweitzer 2005). The central 80% of the TFCC is avascular and has little potential for repair although its

 

 

 

Fig. 4.8 ● Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) test.

 

periphery and the dorsal and palmar ligaments are well vascularized, opening the possibility for healing in this zone (Bulstrode et al 2002).

Traumatic lesions (class one) usually involve a compressive force with rotation and/or ulnar deviation. The injury can be masked by associated fractures of the radius and/or ulna. Degenerative/over-use lesions (class two) are found increasingly over the age of 30 and in some cases may progress from simple TFCC ‘wear’ to accompanying lunotriquetral ligament disruption and ulnocarpal arthritis (Bulstrode et al 2002Miller & Schweitzer 2005).

Clinical tip

Clinical features of TFCC lesions include wrist pain accentuated by movement, particularly pronation and ulnar deviation as well as loading of the clenched fist. These findings are usually accompanied by tenderness and crepitus over the TFCC area (Bulstrode et al 2002).

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

TFCC load test

A very useful test but it can produce false positives and should therefore be taken in conjunction with all other findings.

 

Related tests

The supination lift test requires the patient to sit facing an examination couch with the elbows flexed to 90° and the forearms fully supinated. The couch is positioned at a height that allows the palms of both hands to comfortably make contact with its under-surface. The patient is then asked to attempt to lift the couch up. Localized pain at the base of the ulnar and a reluctance to apply full force are both indicative of a TFCC tear.

 

 

 

THUMB TESTS

Axial compression test

Aka

Axial grind test Thumb grind test Basal joint grind test

Purpose

To detect osteoarthritis (OA) of the trapeziofirstmetacarpal joint (basal joint of the thumb).

Technique

Patient position

The hand rests in a mid-pronated position on a table.

Clinician position and action

The compression test is performed by stabilizing the radial aspect of the wrist with one hand and gripping the first metacarpal shaft with the fingers and thumb of the other. An axial load is applied downwards along the shaft while the metacarpal is gently moved against the trapezium. This has been described as a ‘grind’ technique as the articular surfaces are moved together under compression (see Fig. 4.9).

Positive test

A sudden, sharp pain is usually elicited as compression is applied. Occasionally crepitus may also be noted.

Clinical context

OA of the trapeziofirstmetacarpal joint is the most common site of degenerative joint disease in the hand (Brown & Neumann 2004Ghavami & Oishi 2006McRae 1990). The pain is localized around the base of the thumb and typically described as ‘piercing’

 

 

 

Fig. 4.9 ● Axial compression test of the trapeziofirstmetacarpal joint. The arrow indicates the direction of axial compression.

 

 

and exacerbated by twisting and gripping motions making functional tasks difficult. In the early stages, before changes become detectable on X-ray, the irritated joint capsule may begin to develop capsular restriction causing loss of extension (Atkins et al 2010). At this stage, in the absence of articular changes, the axial compression test is unlikely to be positive but as the condition worsens, laxity of the supporting ligaments and a reduction of bony constraints leads to increasing joint stress and progressive degenerative disease (see below). Once established, the sensitivity of the test increases but diagnosis is ultimately confirmed by radiology where any of the following may be evident: diminished joint space, subluxation, marginal osteophytes, joint sclerosis.

 

Trapeziofirstmetacarpal osteoarthritis staging

Stage I

Mild joint narrowing or subchondral sclerosis noted with small effusion. No laxity, subluxation or osteophyte formation.

Stage II

Possible osteophyte formation at the ulnar side of the distal trapezial articular surface. Mild to moderate subluxation might appear.

 

 

 

Stage III

Further joint space narrowing with cystic changes, bone sclerosis and prominent osteophytes. The first metacarpal is moderately subluxed radially and dorsally. Passive reduction might not be possible.

Stage IV

Scaphotrapezial joint also involved with evidence of destruction, with the trapeziofirstmetacarpal joint immobile and usually largely pain-free.

(Eaton & Glickel 1987)

 

 

Clinical tip

Care needs to be taken when assessing this joint as axial loading can elicit severe twinges of pain, particularly when the condition presents acutely.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

Axial compression test

Used regularly as part of the routine clinical examination – especially if X-rays are not available to grade the stage of osteoarthritis.

 

 

 

Finkelstein’s test

Purpose

To detect pain and limitation caused by inflammation between the tendons of abductor pollicis longus (APL) and extensor pollicis brevis (EPB) and their shared synovial sheath at the distal end of the radius (de Quervain’s tenosynovitis).

Technique

Patient position

With the forearm positioned in pronation, the patient is asked to flex the thumb and close their fingers over it.

Clinician position and action

The lower forearm is fixed with one hand and the patient’s hand taken into ulnar deviation passively with the other.

Positive test

As the wrist is taken towards ulnar deviation, significant pain is reproduced over the radial aspect of the wrist.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.10 ● Finkelstein’s test.

 

Clinical context

De Quervain’s tenosynovitis involves the two tendons in the first dorsal synovial compartment of the wrist. In the chronic stage where adhesions have developed and the sheath has become thickened, the condition is known as de Quervain’s stenosing tenosynovitis (Atkins et al 2010Placzek & Boyce 2006) The patient reports localized pain over the dorsum of the distal radius and this is often accompanied by swelling and crepitus on movement. Isometric resisted testing of the affected tendons is painful but repeated active thumb extension more so. The history is usually one of overuse or unaccustomed activity.

In a large study examining the incidence and demographic risk factors for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis among military personnel, the incidence was reported to be considerably higher in the female population, with age also being a significant risk factor and prevalence increasing in the 40age group (Wolf et al 2009).

The relative excursions of the APL and EPB tendons in the first dorsal compartment during Finkelstein’s testing have been examined in a cadaveric study which showed significantly greater excursion of EPB at both 30° and 60° of ulnar deviation compared to the APL tendon – suggesting that a positive Finkelstein’s test may result more from EPB pathology than the APL (Kutsumi et al 2005). The two tendons usually share a common synovial sheath as they pass through the dorsal compartment however and the symptoms that result from overuse of either tendon are therefore indistinguishable.

 

Clinical tip

Even in the asymptomatic hand this test can be uncomfortable and care should be taken to ensure that the pain is not excessively provoked by an over-vigorous technique, particularly when acutely painful.

De Quervain’s tenosynovitis should not be confused with intersection syndrome which involves the same two tendons as they cross over the wrist extensor muscles in the lower forearm about 5 cm proximal from their sheathed extent (Atkins et al 2010) and, because of this, Finkelstein’s test should not be significantly provocative.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★

Finkelstein’s test

This can be approached with too much vigour. A subtle test if done well.

 

 

 

Ulnar collateral ligament laxity test

Purpose

To detect pain and/or laxity of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) of the first metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint.

Technique

Patient position

Seated with the hand supported on a table in a mid-pronated position.

Clinician position

The examiner stabilizes the distal end of the first metacarpal with the thumb and index finger. The same pincer grip is used with the other hand, placing the fingers over the radial and ulnar aspects of the proximal phalanx.

Action

Fixing the metacarpal, a valgus stress is applied to the joint (which in this position involves the thumb being moved towards the patient).

Positive test

Pain and/or laxity reproduced at the base of the thumb.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.11 ● Valgus stress on the ulnar collateral ligament of the first MCP joint.

 

 

Clinical context

Gamekeeper’s thumb (Campbell 1955) is caused by a chronic insufficiency of the UCL at the first MCP joint leading to pain and weakness of the ‘pinch grasp’. Injury to the UCL also presents acutely most commonly among the skiing population (skier’s thumb), as a result of the ski-pole abruptly stopping in the snow during a fall and the static handle forcing a sudden valgus or abduction stress to the thumb (Davidson & Laliotis 1996, Van Dommelen & Zvirbulis 1989). The UCL originates from the first metacarpal head and inserts into the medial aspect and base of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. When both the ulnar and accessory collateral ligaments are ruptured a Stener lesion may develop, where the aponeurosis of the adjacent adductor brevis muscle (which inserts into the extensor mechanism) becomes interposed between the ruptured ligament and the phalanx. The ligament retracts, no longer able to make contact with its insertion, and fails to heal (Stener 1962). As an important stabilizer of the thumb the loss of the UCL hampers function considerably and

surgical repair is often necessary (Miller & Schweitzer 2005).

The same procedure can be repeated to test the radial collateral ligament by simply applying a varus stress although this ligament is much less commonly involved.

Clinical tip

With the joint in an extended position, valgus testing primarily determines the competence of the accessory collateral ligament which is taut in this position. Laxity of between 15° and 30° would

 

indicate rupture or partial rupture of the ligament and arouse suspicion of a gamekeeper’s fracture where a portion of the proximal phalanx at the UCL insertion becomes avulsed. This is sometimes obvious on examination, with a palpable lump over the ulnar aspect of the MCP joint, but identifying this is not conclusive – the retracted stump of the UCL resulting from a Stener lesion may also be palpable (see clinical context above). A displaced fracture should be eliminated with X-ray before the clinician repeats the valgus test in 30° of flexion, as this position preferentially stresses the UCL and could disturb the fracture site. If the test in extension is normal, gross instability can be ruled out, but more pronounced laxity (30–40°) of the MCP joint in the flexed and extended positions make complete rupture of both ligaments likely (Heyman 1997).

If gamekeeper’s fracture has been ruled out, an MRI or MR

arthrography would be necessary to diagnose a Stener lesion (Harper et al 1996Spaeth et al 1993).

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

Ulnar collateral ligament laxity test

In acute injuries this test can determine whether surgical intervention is required. Most surgeons will have a point at which they will repair the ligament (usually around 30–40° of laxity). However, it is a matter of weighing up a number of factors: age, occupation, patient choice, time elapsed since trauma, anaesthetic risk, etc., as this may alter the threshold for surgical repair.

 

 

 

 

CARPAL TUNNEL TESTS

Phalen’s test

Purpose

To increase pressure on the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel in order to aid diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

 

Technique

Patient position

Seated with the hand resting on a table in mid-pronation.

Clinician position

Seated facing the patient. The affected hand is taken into full wrist flexion (Fig. 4.12A). Alternatively, the patient is asked to flex both wrists and oppose the dorsum of the hands so that the flexion is maintained bilaterally (Fig. 4.12B).

Action

In either position, the wrist flexion is maintained for a minute.

Positive test

Paraesthesiae is reproduced in the cutaneous distribution of the median nerve (the palmar aspect of the thumb, index and middle fingers and the lateral half of the ring finger) as a result of the sustained narrowing at the carpal tunnel during flexion of the wrist. If severe, pain may also be reproduced.

 

A

B

 

 

Fig. 4.12 ● Phalen’s test (A). Phalen’s test – alternative position (B).

 

Clinical context

Studies of CTS have generated a great deal of controversy and no universally accepted diagnostic criteria exist (Placzek & Boyce 2006). Phalen’s test was always widely considered to be the most

 

sensitive physical test but over recent years a number of studies have challenged this and attempted to demonstrate enhanced sensitivity with related or modified tests (Ahn 2001Fertl et al 1998Tetro et al 1998Williams et al 1992). As with other tests for peripheral nerve dysfunction, no individual test can perfectly discriminate between the normal and abnormal and this is particularly so in the milder presentations (Rivner 1994). As a result there is a propensity for both false positive and false negative findings (Magee 2008) and this leads to wide variations in reported sensitivity and specificity (Gerr & Letz 1998Malanga & Nadler 2006).

The absence of an agreed ‘gold standard’ of diagnosis requires the clinician to combine a number of clinical findings which can be used to predict the probability of CTS. The ‘CTS 6’ is a validated clinical diagnostic aid which assesses six factors (Graham 2008):

  1. Numbness exclusively or predominantly in the median nerve distribution of the hand.

  2. Nocturnal numbness.

  3. Thenar atrophy or weakness (grade 4 on examination).

  4. Positive Phalen’s test.

  5. Loss of two-point discrimination (defined by failure to distinguish two points 5 mm apart or less in the median nerve distribution of the hand).

  6. Positive Tinel’s test.

The presence of all these findings is considered to provide a strong indication for CTS. That is not to say that patients with less than the ‘full house’ do not have the condition but the fewer the indicators, the less certain the diagnosis becomes. For the majority of patients who are considered to have CTS on the basis of their history and physical examination alone, the addition of electrodiagnostic testing does not appear to improve the probability of diagnosing the condition to an extent that is clinically relevant (Graham 2008Jordan et al 2002Szabo et al 1999Tetro et al 1998). Conversely, less than half of patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CTS showed a positive result to Phalen’s test (Malanga & Nadler 2006), further reinforcing the need to make a clinical diagnosis based on a number of findings.

Inflammation, and subsequent thickening of the flexor retinacu-

lum and the soft tissues passing through this densely packed tunnel, has often been blamed for the symptoms associated with CTS. The co-morbidity of other conditions where inflammation is not

 

a particular feature has challenged this theory however, and both mechanical and vascular changes that cause swelling and compression are now thought to be responsible (Atkins et al 2010). CTS is often associated with tenosynovitis, diabetes, pregnancy and obesity, all of which have the capacity to potentially cause an increase in pressure in the carpal tunnel. Extrinsic factors, such as certain sports, vibration from heavy machinery and repetitive work, may also compromise the carpal tunnel and lead to symptoms.

 

TABLE 4.1 PHALEN’S TEST

Author and year

LR+

LR

Target condition

Golding et al 1986

0.71

1.05

CTS

Gerr & Letz 1998

1.3

0.8

CTS

Williams et al 1992

88

★★★

0.12

★★

CTS

Tetro et al 1998

3.6

0.5

CTS

CTS  carpal tunnel syndrome

 

Clinical tip

Differential diagnosis of hand paraesthesiae/pain should include cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy, adverse neurodynamics involving the lower cervical nerve roots, thoracic outlet syndrome and ulnar nerve entrapment syndromes at the elbow and wrist.

Flattening of the thenar eminence muscles may be evident in more chronic cases with weakness of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle demonstrable on testing.

 

EXPERT OPINION

COMMENTS

★★★

Phalen’s test

This is the preferential test for CTS but the clinician should always be aware of the potential of a more proximal source of symptoms requiring further examination of the cervical spine and brachial plexus.

 

Additional tests

The prayer test (Fig. 4.13) can also be used to detect CTS. The affected hand is taken into full wrist extension (or together the palms of the hands are opposed and lowered until full extension at both wrists is achieved) and held there for a minute. Even though this is thought to increase the pressure within the carpal tunnel more than in the flexed position, the test is not thought to be as sensitive as Phalen’s test (Malanga & Nadler 2006). A ‘decompression phenom-enon’ is sometimes observed when pressure on the nerve trunk is removed, characterized by a rapid onset of paraesthesiae that can be temporarily uncomfortable for the patient.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.13 ● Prayer test.

 

The tourniquet test attempts to exacerbate median neuropathy in the carpal tunnel by inducing temporary ischaemia in the hand. A blood pressure cuff is inflated proximal to the elbow to approximately 180 mmHg. The cuff pressure is maintained for up to 1 minute. If the patient reports numbness or tingling in the median distribution the test is considered to be positive. However, because this test relies on changes to the vascular supply at the carpal tunnel, symptoms that result predominantly from compression are unlikely to be provoked by this test and as a consequence a high rate of true negatives will be elicited. Equally, depriving the forearm and hand

 

of a normal blood supply may evoke tingling in the asymptomatic individual so false positive findings are also prevalent.

The hand elevation test has been proposed as a useful alternative in the diagnosis of CTS. The hand is simply elevated and sustained in this position for up to a minute. A positive test results in reproduction of the patient’s symptoms. The authors proposing this test compared it favourably with Phalen’s and Tinel’s following their study on a symptomatic population (Ahn 2001) although these findings have not been corroborated independently and the test is not used widely.

The three jaw chuck test (Fig. 4.14) is an alternative method of compressing the carpal tunnel. This involves opposing the fingers with the thumb and then flexing the wrist maximally. Again symptoms should appear within 1 minute.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.14 ● Three jaw chuck test.

 

 

 

Tinel’s test

Aka

Median nerve percussion test

 

Purpose

To elicit paraesthesiae and/or pain in the median nerve distribution of the hand in order to aid diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Technique

Patient position

Seated with the hand resting on a table with the forearm fully supinated.

Clinician position

Sitting facing the patient, the affected hand is held in a neutral position.

Action

The mid-point of the carpal tunnel is identified and ‘tapped’ with a finger or a percussion hammer.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.15 ● Tinel’s test at the carpal tunnel.

 

Positive test

Temporary paraethesiae or pain in the cutaneous distribution of the median nerve in the hand (palmar aspect of the thumb, index and middle fingers and the lateral half of the ring finger) is reported.

 

Clinical context

Tinel’s test is used in other compressive neuropathies, although it is best known for the detection of CTS. Wide variations in both sensitivity and specificity of the test have been reported (Gerr & Letz 1998Golding et al 1986Heller et al 1986Katz et al 1990Williams et al 1992), leading to divergent recommendations, from abandoning physical tests altogether and referring symptomatic patients for neurophysiological examination (DeKrom et al 1990) to concluding that Tinel’s and other physical tests have real prognostic and diagnostic value (Seror 1987). There are a number of possible reasons why results are so varied, including differences in patient selection, variability in testing procedure and variations in how the condition is defined. In addition, studies that use asymptomatic subjects as a control produce much higher rates of both sensitivity and specificity (Gerr & Letz 1998Williams et al 1992) than studies where symptomatic patients – who were shown not to have CTS after elec-trodiagnosis – were used as the control.

Paraesthesiae in the hand is a common presentation that requires

the clinician to consider all possible causes (see Phalen’s test, p. 135) before a diagnosis of CTS is made. In the early stages of the condition when the symptoms are often more subtle, diagnostic hesitancy can lead to an over-reliance on electrodiagnostics which in themselves have been shown to be less than conclusive, particularly in the mild to moderate stages of the condition, leading to unacceptable levels of reported error (Lo et al 2002Rivner 1994).

No physical test has been shown to be definitive although a combination of tests, including Tinel’s, was shown to yield reasonable detection rates (Graham 2008Katz et al 1990Malanga & Nadler 2006). (See Phalen’s test, p. 135, carpal compression test, p. 145.)

Clinical tip

Tinel’s test can also be used to detect the extent of regeneration of the sensory fibres of the median nerve where the most distal point of abnormal sensation represents the distal extent of the regeneration.

 

TABLE 4.2 TINEL’S TEST

Author and year

LR+

LR

Target condition

DeKrom et al 1990

0.6

1.3

CTS

Golding et al 1986

1.3

0.9

CTS

Gerr & Letz 1998

0.67

1.1

CTS

Tetro et al 1998

8.2

★★

0.3

CTS

Williams et al 1992

67

★★★

0.3

CTS

CTS  carpal tunnel syndrome

 

The clinician commences tapping at the tip of the palmar surface of the index finger and moves proximally towards the mid-point of the carpal tunnel and progresses in the midline towards the forearm, ascertaining from the patient when the sensation changes from abnormal to normal.

In the early stages of nerve compression, the clinician taps from the proximal to the distal extent of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel until pins and needles are reproduced. The most distal point that elicits the paraesthesiae is thought to signify the furthest point of nerve compression.

 

EXPERT OPINION COMMENTS

★★

Tinel’s test

Used mainly to determine continued potential for nerve recovery post op/trauma rather than actual diagnosis of the condition.

 

Related tests

Although less common, ulnar tunnel syndrome results from compression of the ulnar nerve as it passes through Guyon’s canal (the

 

tunnel formed by the bridging of the pisohamate ligament – an extension of the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon – between the pisiform and hamate). It is usually caused by sustained compression (e.g. positioning the ulnar border of the hand on the handlebars when cycling with the wrist in extension and radial deviation) but can also result from ganglia, fracture or rheumatoid arthritis. Tinel’s test can be repeated, tapping distally from the pisiform (Fig. 4.16). Both the motor and sensory divisions of the nerve may be affected but usually only one. If the sensory division is involved, decreased sensation over the palmar aspect of the fourth and fifth fingers may be evident, while weakness of the palmar interossei and medial two lumbricals would incriminate the motor division (Gross et al 2002). The most medial palmar interossei can be tested by sliding a piece of paper between the ring and little finger and asking the patient to hold this in place. Most commonly, ulnar tunnel syndrome is accompanied by tenderness over the tunnel.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.16 ● Tinel’s test at the ulnar tunnel.

 

 

 

Carpal compression test

 

Aka

Pressure provocative test Manual carpal compression test Durkan’s compression test

Purpose

To increase pressure on the median nerve as it passes through the carpal tunnel in order to aid diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

Technique

Patient position

Seated with the forearm supinated with the hand rested on a table.

Clinician position and action

Sitting facing the patient, the examiner places one thumb, superimposed with the other, over the mid-point of the flexor retinaculum and presses firmly downwards for up to a minute while maintaining counterpressure with the fingers on the dorsum of the hand.

 

 

 

Fig. 4.17 ● Carpal compression test.

 

Positive test

Paraesthesiae are reproduced in the cutaneous distribution of the median nerve (palmar aspect of the thumb, index and middle fingers and the lateral half of the ring finger) and if the condition is severe, pain may also be evoked.

 

Clinical context

The carpal compression test has been shown to be more sensitive than both Phalen’s (see p. 135) and Tinel’s (see p. 140) tests (Durkan 1994Fertl et al 1998González et al 1997McRae 1990Williams et al 1992) with symptoms often reproducible within several seconds, suggesting that it is a simple, fast and valuable provocative test for CTS (González et al 1997). In an attempt to standardize the amount of pressure required to consistently reproduce the symptoms, the use of an instrumented carpal compression device was tested and shown to deliver a similar degree of sensitivity and specificity in a controlled population of symptomatic patients (Durkan 1994). Although comparing favourably with other CTS tests, no technique can be regarded as diagnostic and a combination of findings should always be considered. The value of electrodiagnostic studies in the diagnosis of CTS has also been questioned (see Phalen’s test, p. 135).

 

TABLE 4.3 CARPAL COMPRESSION TEST

Author and year

LR+

LR

Target condition

Gonzalez et al 1997

7.9

★★

0.15

★★

CTS

Durkan 1994

22.3

★★★

0.11

★★

CTS

Tetro et al 1998

10.7

★★★

0.27

CTS

Williams et al 1992

33

★★★

0.01

★★★

CTS

CTS  carpal tunnel syndrome

 

Clinical tip

This test is also usefully employed where there is limited range of flexion or pain at the wrist which prevents an effective Phalen’s test from being performed.

Accurate localization of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel is necessary for effective testing. The distal wrist crease is level with the proximal border of the flexor retinaculum so pressure needs to be distal to this line and centrally – over the crease that separates the thenar and hypothenar eminences (the crease can be enhanced by opposing the thumb and fifth finger).

Variations

The test can be further modified by either adding passive wrist extension (while asking the patient to grip) or passive wrist flexion (Fertl et al 1998Tetro et al 1998). The latter has been found to have an optimal cut-off time of just 20 seconds and, again, has compared favourably in terms of sensitivity and specificity with both Phalen’s and Tinel’s tests.

 

TABLE 4.4 CARPAL COMPRESSION TEST WITH FLEXION/EXTENSION

Author and year

LR+

LR

Target condition

Tetro et al 1998

82

★★★

0.18

★★

CTS

CTS  carpal tunnel syndrome

 

 

 

References

Ahn, D.S., 2001. Hand elevation: a new test for carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann.

Plast. Surg. 46 (2), 120–124.

Atkins, E., Kerr, E., Goodlad, J., 2010. A Practical Approach to Orthopaedic Medicine, third ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

Brown, D.E., Neumann, R.D., 2004. Orthopaedic Secrets, third ed. Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia.

Bulstrode, C., Buckwalter, J., Carr, A., et al., 2002. Oxford Textbook of Orthopaedics and Trauma. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Campbell, C.S., 1955. Gamekeeper’s thumb. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 37 (1), 148–149.

Davidson, T.M., Laliotis, A.T., 1996. Snowboarding injuries, a four-year study with comparison with alpine ski injuries. West. J. Med. 164 (3), 231–237.

 

DeKrom, M.C., Knipschild, P.G., Kester, A.D., 1990. Efficacy of provocative tests for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Lancet 335 (8686), 393–395.

Durkan, J.A., 1994. The carpal-compression test: an instrumented device for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Orthop. Rev. 23 (6), 522–525.

Eaton, R.G., Glickel, S.Z., 1987. Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: staging as a rationale for treatment. Hand Clin. 3 (4), 455–471.

Fertl, E., Wober, C., Zeitlhofer, J., 1998. The serial use of two provocative tests in the clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Neurol. Scand. 98 (5), 328–332.

Gerr, F., Letz, R., 1998. The sensitivity and specificity of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome vary with the comparison subjects. J. Hand Surg. Br. 23 (2), 151–155.

Ghavami, A., Oishi, S.N., 2006. Thumb trapeziometacarpal arthritis: treatment with ligament reconstruction tendon interposition arthroplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 117 (6), 116e–128e.

Golding, D.N., Rose, D.M., Selvarajah, K., 1986. Clinical tests for carpal tunnel syndrome: an evaluation. Br. J. Rheumatol. 25 (4), 388–390.

González del Pino, J., Delgado-Martínez, A.D., González González, I., et al., 1997. Value of the carpal compression test in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg. Br. 22 (1), 38–41.

Graham, B., 2008. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90 (12), 2587–2593.

Gross, J., Fetto, J., Rosen, E., 2002. Musculoskeletal Examination, second ed.

Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.

Harper, M.T., Chandnani, V.P., Spaeth, J., et al., 1996. Gamekeeper thumb: diagnosis of ulnar collateral ligament injury using magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and stress radiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 6 (2), 322–328.

Heller, L., Ring, H., Costeff, H., et al., 1986. Evaluation of Tinel’s and Phalen’s signs in diagnosis of the carpal tunnel syndrome. Eur. Neurol. 25 (1), 40–42.

Heyman, P., 1997. Injuries to the ulnar collateral ligament of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 5 (4), 224–229.

Jordan, R., Carter, T., Cummins, C., 2002. A systematic review of the utility of electrodiagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 52 (481), 670–673.

Katz, J.N., Larson, M.G., Sabra, A., et al., 1990. The carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic utility of the history and physical examination findings. Ann. Intern. Med. 112 (5), 321–327.

Kutsumi, K., Amadio, P.C., Zhao, C., et al., 2005. Finkelstein’s test: a biomechani-cal analysis. J. Hand Surg. Am. 30 (1), 130–135.

Lo, J.K., Finestone, H.M., lbert, K., et al., 2002. Community-based referrals for electrodiagnostic studies in patients with possible carpal tunnel syndrome: what is the diagnosis? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 83 (5), 598–603.

McRae, R., 1990. Clinical Orthopaedic Examination, third ed. Churchill Livingstone, London.

Magee, D.J., 2008. Orthopaedic Physical Assessment, fifth ed. Saunders, Philadelphia.

 

Malanga, G.A., Nadler, S., 2006. Musculoskeletal Physical Examination: An Evidence-Based Approach. Elsevier Health Sciences, Philadelphia.

Miller, T.T., Schweitzer, M.E., 2005. Diagnostic Musculoskeletal Imaging.

McGraw-Hill, New York.

Palmer, A.K., Werner, F.W., 1981. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist – anatomy and function. J. Hand Surg. Am. 6 (2), 153–162.

Placzek, J.D., Boyce, D.A., 2006. Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Secrets, second ed. Elsevier Health Sciences, Missouri.

Rivner, M.H., 1994. Statistical errors and their effect on electrodiagnostic medicine. Muscle Nerve 17 (7), 811–814.

Seror, P., 1987. Tinel’s sign in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg. Br. 12 (3), 364–365.

Spaeth, H.J., Abrams, R.A., Bock, G.W., et al., 1993. Gamekeeper thumb: differentiation of nondisplaced and displaced tears of the ulnar collateral ligament with MR imaging: work in progress. Radiology 188 (2), 553–556.

Stener, B., 1962. Displacement of the ruptured ulnar collateral ligament of the metacarpo-phalangeal joint of the thumb. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 44, 869–879.

Szabo, R.M., Slater, R.R., Farver, T.B., et al., 1999. The value of diagnostic testing in carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg. Am. 24 (4), 704–714.

Tetro, A.M., Evanoff, B.A., Hollstien, S.B., et al., 1998. A new provocative test for carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of wrist flexion and nerve compression.

J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 80 (3), 493–498.

Van Dommelen, B.A., Zvirbulis, R.A., 1989. Upper extremity injuries in snow skiers. Am. J. Sports Med. 17 (6), 751–753.

Weiss, S., Finkelstein, N., 2005. Hand Rehabilitation – A Quick Reference Guide and Review, second ed. Elsevier Mosby, St Louis.

Williams, T.M., Mackinnon, S.E., Novak, C.B., et al., 1992. Verification of the pressure provocative test in carpal tunnel syndrome. Ann. Plast. Surg. 29 (1), 8–11.

Wolf, J.M., Sturdivant, R.X., Owens, B.D., 2009. Incidence of de Quervain’s tenosynovitis in a young, active population. J. Hand Surg. Am. 34 (1), 112–115.